Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is precisely the same argument as your last post and its still a complete failure. Why don't you try to show us that humans burning fossil fuels are not causing the planet to warm?
www.ipcc.ch. And they DO show their math.in the year 2021 ... carbon emissions were UP ... but temperatures are DOWN ... do you have an explanation? ... and show your math ...
In science ... it is the claimant who must prove their case ... not for others to have to disprove ... you don't, which is why folks think you don't have any science education ... but we'll see with the math you post with the explantion above ... ha ha ha ha ...
www.ipcc.ch. And they DO show their math.
And when the FUCK are ANY of you going to stop calling for proofs in the natural sciences? Nothing on this forum says "I have no science education" more than your continual whinging for "PROOF".
I am quite certain that the scientists whose work went into the six IPCC assessment reports were well aware of both.Here is a great article to read about the Crazy Climate Change Doomsday Cult.
Climate Change is a Malicious, Dangerous Myth
The Chief Climate Loonies (all 20,000 of them if COP26 is anything to go by) are meeting in a lovely holiday resort town in Egypt for COP27.vernoncoleman.org
The global warming loonies don’t seem to be aware that we’ve always had weather and there have always been loonies warning that the end of the world is nigh.
And during the time period your reports here cover, the following happened:In 1817, the President of the Royal Society in London warned that there had been a considerable change of climate that would lead to massive changes. In 1947, a Swedish geophysicist warned that the climate was warming up. In the 1970s, the BBC, that perennial source of misinformation, warned of an oncoming ice age – as big a threat to life as a nuclear war. In 2007 we were warned that we had five years to save the planet. In 2011, the International Energy Agency said we had five years left. In 2017, the United Nations said we had three years left. In2013, a Cambridge professor said all the Arctic ice would be gone by 2015. In 2009, Gordon Brown, then UK PM, took time off from buggering up the economy to tell us we had 50 days left. Back in 2004, the Observer newspaper told us that we’d be living in a Siberian climate by 2020. Eleven years ago, Prince Charles said we had eight years left to save the planet.
www.weforum.org
opentheword.org
Why do the ice caps keep growing if the Crazy Climate Change Cult keeps saying that the seas are rising?
Arctic ice cap growing again
Remember how former US Vice President Al Gore famously predicted in 2009 that the Arctic ice caps would be completely ice-free in five to seven years because of Global Warming. Well, FEE reports on…
andthentheresphysics.wordpress.com
www.nature.com
Pseudo moralistic stancesPsychiatrist Dr Tanveer Ahmed says climate change protesters symbolically have an “anti-civilisation” approach to their actions.
“There’s a real performative victimhood going on,” Mr Ahmed told Sky News host Andrew Bolt.
“People with their own personal vulnerabilities acting out in the name of helping others when in fact they are harming others.
“They’re not finding other outlets for meaningful lives and they’ve latched onto these apocalyptic ideas to try and meet their own needs.”
Climate change protesters are displaying âperformative victimhoodâ
Psychiatrist Dr Tanveer Ahmed says climate change protesters symbolically have an “anti-civilisation” approach to their actions. “There’s a real performative victimhood going on,” Mr Ahmed told Sky News host Andrew Bolt. “People with their own personal vulnerabilities acting out in the name...www.skynews.com.au
comment:
If the dumb liberal crackpots are against fossil fuel, then they should stop using fossil fuel.
no electricity
no cars
no buses
no trains
no planes
no food fertilized by fossil fuel
no food cultivated by tractors and delivered to market by trucks using fossil fuel
no plastic made from fossil fuel
They should prove to the world that they really believe that they can save the planet by not using any fossil fuel.
But of course, they won't do it.
It is all just delusional virtue preening.
They don't have the mental capacity to understand that radical Climate Change policies will cause immense human suffering with starvation and wars.
View attachment 723076
Do you drink? Smoke? Ever speed in your car? Cruise through a stop sign? Eat fatty foods? Salty foods? Red meat? So... fuck off with your moral bullshit.Pseudo moralistic stances
As Jordan Peterson said - People have things more on their personal purview that are more difficult to deal with and that they are avoiding and generally that the way they avoid them is by adopting pseudo moralistic stances on large scale social issues that it makes them look good to your friends and neighbours.Do you drink? Smoke? Ever speed in your car? Cruise through a stop sign? Eat fatty foods? Salty foods? Red meat? So... fuck off with your moral bullshit.
The problem here is sorting out the problems of the planet and they cannot wait for all of us to sort out the carbon footprint of the tenth of an ounce of super glue we consume annually.As Jordan Peterson said - People have things more on their personal purview that are more difficult to deal with and that they are avoiding and generally that the way they avoid them is by adopting pseudo moralistic stances on large scale social issues that it makes them look good to your friends and neighbours.
I wish people would fuck off jumping on the Pseudo Moralistic Stances bandwagon and go and sort their lives out.
The irony is, these idiots that use super glue -
Most types of Super Glue are made with synthetic polymers, complex polymers you are highly unlikely to stumble upon in the wild. Apparently, complex polymers can be derived from petroleum and other materials. The recent period saw a surge of interest in research on degradable polymers.
Super Glue likely features non-animal ingredients. The industrial-scale processes whereby complex polymers are converted into ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate and its variations are likely harmful for the environment.
UHU, Weldbond, Gorilla Glue and Elmer's Are All Vegan — What About Super Glue?
Is Super Glue vegan? Super Glue is made in an industrial setting using complex polymers. But does it contain animal-derived ingredients, as it used to?www.greenmatters.com
So is 440ppm co2 high? If someone is against something, why use it. Did these climate idiots use that quantity of petroleum super glue before their stupid stunts? So they've upped their crude oil product consumption to save the planet.The problem here is sorting out the problems of the planet and they cannot wait for all of us to sort out the carbon footprint of the tenth of an ounce of super glue we consume annually.
No, he didn't. Where do you kooks come up with this stuff? And is there any dumb propaganda spiel that you haven't fallen for?Al Gore warned us that Manhattan Island would be under water by 2013.
What _are_ you babbling about?So is 440ppm co2 high? If someone is against something, why use it. Did these climate idiots use that quantity of petroleum super glue before their stupid stunts? So they've upped their crude oil product consumption to save the planet.
The Climate Doomsday Cult is unreachable with logic and reason.No, he didn't. Where do you kooks come up with this stuff? And is there any dumb propaganda spiel that you haven't fallen for?
Anyways, Gore Rule invoked. The first one to bring up Gore forfeits the thread for their side. Those who can discuss the issues, do. Those who can't, they fave about political figures who have nothing to do with the science.
Thanks for playing, and we have some lovely parting gifts for you, including our USMB home game.
www.washingtonexaminer.com
What logic or reason failed to reach those particular "Doomsday Cult" members?The Climate Doomsday Cult is unreachable with logic and reason.
Environmental apocalypse predictions have failed for half a century - Washington Examiner
Climate change activism is warming up this week with climate strikes, a U.N. summit, plus extra media coverage. Naturally, the apocalyptic rhetoric is warming up, too. To take only two examples among many: “2020 could be your last chance to stop an apocalypse,” warned a Los Angeles Times...
For a species that has seen nothing higher than 300 ppm throughout its entire existence, yes.So is 440ppm co2 high?
Because it serves a purpose and cannot yet be completely replaced. Most sixth graders could have answered that question. So either it was rhetorical or you're really, really dense.If someone is against something, why use it.
OOoooohhh... you're referring to the protestors super gluing themselves to museum walls. I didn't make the connection. Surely you can find a better gibe for people throwing soup at Van Gogh's Sunflowers than the hypocrisy of their using superglue.Did these climate idiots use that quantity of petroleum super glue before their stupid stunts? So they've upped their crude oil product consumption to save the planet.
Make any assumption you want but its certainly not supported by the facts and has not one iota of the significance you seem to wish it had.If anyone feels there's a planet problem, can we assume they've stopped buying petroleum based products, such as plastic.
Brighter than you apparentlySo they won't renew their computer and mobile phone, they don't buy food and drink contained in plastic, etc.. Were they wearing manmade factory fibre clothing? But the vegans won't allow wool. So I assume there's no vegan that's planet conscious on avoiding petroleum based products They're not very bright are they!!
No.Did any of that cross your mind too?
Have you identified the radiative forcing component that was responsible for the last interglacial cycle being 2C warmer than today with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today?Has Dr Ahmed falsified the greenhouse effect or the theory of anthropogenic global warming?
You've seen the diagrams, so I'm not going to pull it up again. There are several radiative forcing factors that work in differing directions and with different magnitudes and the final result is the algebraic sum of all those factors. And, of course, there are non-radiative factors that can raise or lower the Earth's average temperature. That you keep asking for a single factor to explain your magic moment is getting old and weak. Personally, I think you'd make a better argument explaining what factors you believed caused your magic moment and, apparently, give you cause to reject the greenhouse effect. Stop asking a question that no one's going to answer; it's not doing what you think it's doing.Have you identified the radiative forcing component that was responsible for the last interglacial cycle being 2C warmer than today with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today?
Walk me through the combination of radiative forcing components you think were responsible for it being 2C warmer than today with 26ft higher sea levels than today with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today.You've seen the diagrams, so I'm not going to pull it up again. There are several radiative forcing factors that work in differing directions and with different magnitudes and the final result is the algebraic sum of all those factors. And, of course, there are non-radiative factors that can raise or lower the Earth's average temperature. That you keep asking for a single factor to explain your magic moment is getting old and weak. Personally, I think you'd make a better argument explaining what factors you believed caused your magic moment and, apparently, give you cause to reject the greenhouse effect. Stop asking a question that no one's going to answer; it's not doing what you think it's doing.
