Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Show me where it mentions anything about other country's?
The Bill of Rights: A Transcription
The Preamble to The Bill of Rights
Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.
RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.
ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the "Bill of Rights."
I have already posted an example of the BoR recognizing a right that belongs to ALL "persons", regardless of citizenship. If you didn't understand the answer the first time, giving it a 2nd time is a waste of time.
You've posted nothing.
Since you think everybody has rights that are protected by the bill of rights I have a question.
Do they have the right to keep and bear arm protected by the second Amendment?
Do they have the right to vote? Do they have a right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
I have already posted an example of the BoR recognizing a right that belongs to ALL "persons", regardless of citizenship. If you didn't understand the answer the first time, giving it a 2nd time is a waste of time.
You've posted nothing.
Since you think everybody has rights that are protected by the bill of rights I have a question.
Do they have the right to keep and bear arm protected by the second Amendment?
Do they have the right to vote? Do they have a right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
I posted an example of a right that applies to everyone, regardless of citizenship
WRT your questions, those rights are reserved to "the people". IOW, they apply only to citizens
My turn to ask a question "Why does the Constitution speak of The right of the people in some amendments, while others refer to "any person" or "no person"?
You've posted nothing.
Since you think everybody has rights that are protected by the bill of rights I have a question.
Do they have the right to keep and bear arm protected by the second Amendment?
Do they have the right to vote? Do they have a right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
I posted an example of a right that applies to everyone, regardless of citizenship
WRT your questions, those rights are reserved to "the people". IOW, they apply only to citizens
My turn to ask a question "Why does the Constitution speak of The right of the people in some amendments, while others refer to "any person" or "no person"?
Give the amendment that you are talking about.
I posted an example of a right that applies to everyone, regardless of citizenship
WRT your questions, those rights are reserved to "the people". IOW, they apply only to citizens
My turn to ask a question "Why does the Constitution speak of The right of the people in some amendments, while others refer to "any person" or "no person"?
Give the amendment that you are talking about.
Now the wingnut wants me to read the constitution to him
Why don't you just admit you don't know the answer to the question?
Give the amendment that you are talking about.
Now the wingnut wants me to read the constitution to him
Why don't you just admit you don't know the answer to the question?
It's whoop-dee-doo time in Right Wing World.
gawd, some of these right wing dipshits are --- uhm --- err --- ahhh --- dipshits.
Now the wingnut wants me to read the constitution to him
Why don't you just admit you don't know the answer to the question?
It's whoop-dee-doo time in Right Wing World.
gawd, some of these right wing dipshits are --- uhm --- err --- ahhh --- dipshits.
He's acting like reading the BoR is a sysiphean task. For a wingnut, I guess it is.
I posted an example of a right that applies to everyone, regardless of citizenship
WRT your questions, those rights are reserved to "the people". IOW, they apply only to citizens
My turn to ask a question "Why does the Constitution speak of The right of the people in some amendments, while others refer to "any person" or "no person"?
Give the amendment that you are talking about.
Now the wingnut wants me to read the constitution to him
Why don't you just admit you don't know the answer to the question?
It's whoop-dee-doo time in Right Wing World.
gawd, some of these right wing dipshits are --- uhm --- err --- ahhh --- dipshits.
He's acting like reading the BoR is a sysiphean task. For a wingnut, I guess it is.
in all fairness bigred is mentally challenged. Expecting him to grasp basic concepts is just unfair.
Give the amendment that you are talking about.
Now the wingnut wants me to read the constitution to him
Why don't you just admit you don't know the answer to the question?
Simple thing for you to do is post the amendmen you are talking about. This way there will not be any confussion.
He's acting like reading the BoR is a sysiphean task. For a wingnut, I guess it is.
in all fairness bigred is mentally challenged. Expecting him to grasp basic concepts is just unfair.
dante time to take your meds.
in all fairness bigred is mentally challenged. Expecting him to grasp basic concepts is just unfair.
dante time to take your meds.
either way you are
denial? or
Dude!! You keep asking me to post something I already posted, and every time I tell you that I already posted. But you just keep asking. You claim posting the amendment will clear up your confusion, but I posted it, and you're still confused
Give the amendment that you are talking about.
Now the wingnut wants me to read the constitution to him
Why don't you just admit you don't know the answer to the question?
.Simple thing for you to do is post the amendmen you are talking about. This way there will not be any confussion
denial? or
Dude!! You keep asking me to post something I already posted, and every time I tell you that I already posted. But you just keep asking. You claim posting the amendment will clear up your confusion, but I posted it, and you're still confused
Are you speaking for dante? Or are you and dante one in the same since you replied to a comment I made to him.
Now the wingnut wants me to read the constitution to him
Why don't you just admit you don't know the answer to the question?
.Simple thing for you to do is post the amendmen you are talking about. This way there will not be any confussion
sangha now I am addressiung you
Dude!! You keep asking me to post something I already posted, and every time I tell you that I already posted. But you just keep asking. You claim posting the amendment will clear up your confusion, but I posted it, and you're still confused
Are you speaking for dante? Or are you and dante one in the same since you replied to a comment I made to him.
Someone mentioned meds, so I automatically thought of you
sangha now I am addressiung you
Dude, I already posted a reference to the amendment and you're still confused. Explain to me why posting it again will clear up your confusion?
And why do you need the constitution quoted to you in order to understand the phrases "the rights of the people" and "any person" and "no person"? Tell me which words you don't understand, and I'll post a link to dictionary.com
sangha now I am addressiung you
Dude, I already posted a reference to the amendment and you're still confused. Explain to me why posting it again will clear up your confusion?
And why do you need the constitution quoted to you in order to understand the phrases "the rights of the people" and "any person" and "no person"? Tell me which words you don't understand, and I'll post a link to dictionary.com
What amendment?
