Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, there is also that possibility.Or didnt think....
I stand corrected.
Here's dealing with it:Well, there is also that possibility.Or didnt think....
I stand corrected.
You had to butcher my quote instead of dealing with it? Par for the course
Yep!....just more phony outrage from the anti Obama media.he sent out a fund raising letter on the same night Boehner asked him to switch the speech. Whoa...that means....what does that mean? Obama sent out campaign letters? OH THE HORROR! I thought I would never see the day when someone didnt know the definition of proof
The point is that it shouldn't make you angry...especially not enough to lash out at people and call them names.Yeah, right...It was the "anti-Obammy media" who deliberately tried to schedule a big dog-and-pony show speech in direct conflict with the GOP primary debate.
Of course it wasn't a coincidence...but it still shouldn't make you angry.Well, at least you can acknowledge that the chances that this was a scheduling coincidence are on an extremely low order of probability.
Even though that's more intellectual honesty than we normally get from leftist fluffers like you, it still isn't enough to divert attention from the fact.
Oh, and your projection of *ahem* assumed emotional states upon others is entirely irrelevant.
To disagree, one doesn't have to be disagreeable....Barry M Goldwater
For this particular scheduling issue...Obama doesn't need to be defended. Obama is also supposed to create ploys for attention, or at least his strategists are...it's election season!Not making me angry at all.
What's irritating is the fluffers acting as though it was all just an innocent mistake, when anyone with half a brain can see that it was a deliberate ploy for attention.
Yet not so irritating that it takes the amusement out of mocking the useful idiots who have their heads jammed up Boiking's ass.
And he's black too.
You (the royal "you", not you in particular) don't need to be a pawn of the politico/media complex to recognize and call bullshit on an over-aged punk, who's just stirring up the shit to get attention and fill his campaign coffers.For this particular scheduling issue...Obama doesn't need to be defended. Obama is also supposed to create ploys for attention, or at least his strategists are...it's election season!Not making me angry at all.
What's irritating is the fluffers acting as though it was all just an innocent mistake, when anyone with half a brain can see that it was a deliberate ploy for attention.
Yet not so irritating that it takes the amusement out of mocking the useful idiots who have their heads jammed up Boiking's ass.
And conservative media is doing what they're supposed to do...make people mad at Obama for just exisiting.
It's all great...as long as one (not you in particular) recognizes the possibility they may be a pawn.
What you're describing is called fund raising. Even though you say you're not, you seem pretty angry. It's not been my experience that angry people do the clearest of thinking and analyzing. No offense.You (the royal "you", not you in particular) don't need to be a pawn of the politico/media complex to recognize and call bullshit on an over-aged punk, who's just stirring up the shit to get attention and fill his campaign coffers.For this particular scheduling issue...Obama doesn't need to be defended. Obama is also supposed to create ploys for attention, or at least his strategists are...it's election season!Not making me angry at all.
What's irritating is the fluffers acting as though it was all just an innocent mistake, when anyone with half a brain can see that it was a deliberate ploy for attention.
Yet not so irritating that it takes the amusement out of mocking the useful idiots who have their heads jammed up Boiking's ass.
And conservative media is doing what they're supposed to do...make people mad at Obama for just exisiting.
It's all great...as long as one (not you in particular) recognizes the possibility they may be a pawn.
The June 24, 1986, edition of The Wall Street Journal featured a story headlined, Presidents Bid to Address the House On Nicaragua Is Rejected by Speaker. Thats right, no quibbling over the date and time, just a flat-out rejection. In that case, President Ronald Reagan wanted to address the House before its critical vote on funding for the anti-communist Contra rebels in Nicaragua. Then-Speaker Thomas Tip ONeil said that he was willing to host a Reagan speech if it was expanded to include the Senate in a joint session, or he would allow the President to speak to the House alone if the President would also agree to take questions from lawmakers. Otherwise, there would be no Reagan speech in the House chamber. Reagan already had the votes to prevail in the Senate, and Mr. ONeil wanted to avoid having the spotlight turned on the House, which would make him and his colleagues accountable to the public if Contra aid were rejected.
Both Speaker ONeil then and Speaker Boehner this week were on very solid Constitutional ground. The president has no more right to take over the proceedings in the House, or to invite himself in, than does the speaker have the right to commandeer the presidents time and attention within the White House.
Calling bullshit on bullshitting bullshitters ≠ anger.What you're describing is called fund raising. Even though you say you're not, you seem pretty angry. It's not been my experience that angry people do the clearest of thinking and analyzing. No offense.You (the royal "you", not you in particular) don't need to be a pawn of the politico/media complex to recognize and call bullshit on an over-aged punk, who's just stirring up the shit to get attention and fill his campaign coffers.For this particular scheduling issue...Obama doesn't need to be defended. Obama is also supposed to create ploys for attention, or at least his strategists are...it's election season!
And conservative media is doing what they're supposed to do...make people mad at Obama for just exisiting.
It's all great...as long as one (not you in particular) recognizes the possibility they may be a pawn.
I'm not sure you really understand the concept of projection.Calling bullshit on bullshitting bullshitters ≠ anger.What you're describing is called fund raising. Even though you say you're not, you seem pretty angry. It's not been my experience that angry people do the clearest of thinking and analyzing. No offense.You (the royal "you", not you in particular) don't need to be a pawn of the politico/media complex to recognize and call bullshit on an over-aged punk, who's just stirring up the shit to get attention and fill his campaign coffers.
You may now cease and desist with your pedantic attempts at projection.
No offense.
Sometimes it's necessary to shout and hurl obscenities.Of course it wasn't a coincidence...but it still shouldn't make you angry.Well, at least you can acknowledge that the chances that this was a scheduling coincidence are on an extremely low order of probability.
Even though that's more intellectual honesty than we normally get from leftist fluffers like you, it still isn't enough to divert attention from the fact.
Oh, and your projection of *ahem* assumed emotional states upon others is entirely irrelevant.
I'm not a leftist. I'm not a Democrat. I didn't vote for Obama. I'm a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian.
What I hate...and am against....is the 24 cable media, and shoddy tabloid pseudo journalism that is repsonsible for Americans NOT being able to bring up politics without it turning into a shouting match. And right now....it's conservative media that's trying to get us to hate each other.
Barry Goldwater, another fiscal conservative and social libertarian, said it best
To disagree, one doesn't have to be disagreeable....Barry M Goldwater
I would expand to say they don't have to be vulgar, or profane either. But every time the party that is out of power wants the Presidency back...they pull this stuff...ever since the immortal Lee Atwater cranked the volume up on that vitriol to 10.
I can't believe I'm actualy about to write this......but I'm glad Boehner has too much class to do that.Sometimes it's necessary to shout and hurl obscenities.Of course it wasn't a coincidence...but it still shouldn't make you angry.Well, at least you can acknowledge that the chances that this was a scheduling coincidence are on an extremely low order of probability.
Even though that's more intellectual honesty than we normally get from leftist fluffers like you, it still isn't enough to divert attention from the fact.
Oh, and your projection of *ahem* assumed emotional states upon others is entirely irrelevant.
I'm not a leftist. I'm not a Democrat. I didn't vote for Obama. I'm a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian.
What I hate...and am against....is the 24 cable media, and shoddy tabloid pseudo journalism that is repsonsible for Americans NOT being able to bring up politics without it turning into a shouting match. And right now....it's conservative media that's trying to get us to hate each other.
Barry Goldwater, another fiscal conservative and social libertarian, said it best
To disagree, one doesn't have to be disagreeable....Barry M Goldwater
I would expand to say they don't have to be vulgar, or profane either. But every time the party that is out of power wants the Presidency back...they pull this stuff...ever since the immortal Lee Atwater cranked the volume up on that vitriol to 10.
When our impertinent punk President ASSUMES that the Speaker will bow to his blatant stunt, deliberately scheduled to upstage a planned GOP debate, Speaker Boehner and every other rational person should, very loudly, tell him to "Fuck off!"
