Presidents and JOBS

[RetiredGySgt]

Presidents neither hire nor fire large numbers of people, they have no direct input on the hiring and firing of peoplel either. Actions taken via signing bills out of Congress or supporting the Fed chairmen may have indirect effects but again the President be he REPUBLICAN or DEMOCRAT has no real control on the number of people hired or fired in any given year.

 

[California Girl]

There are many, many issues that the POTUS is either slammed for or credited with that the POTUS should not be.

 

[strollingbones]

well said, sunshine

 

[Murf76]

It's Obama's policies, the Socialist Democrat agenda, which hurts jobs. Hell, an employer might as well legally adopt a potential employee as to hire him in the current environment.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, they have WASTED billions in so-called "job creation" with more to come. And that IS his fault. He's the guy who signs the spending bills.

 

[CurveLight]

Is this what you do gunny? Start new useless threads when it's shown you're fucking clueless in other threads? Why the hell do punks like you even post on a board? Look at this op. It's obvious the Prez doesn't hire or fire people in the workforce but you want to drop it as if it is some form of revelation? Given what I've seen so far I wouldn't be surprised if you made this op because you just now found out the Prez doesn't hire or fire people.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Well the federal government is hiring faster than the private sector and on average government employees are paid more than private sector employees

So it can be said that the Presidents policies of ever increasing government expansion is "creating" jobs.

Of course all the money to pay for those government employees comes out of our pockets.

 

[Gatekeeper]

It's Obama's policies, the Socialist Democrat agenda, which hurts jobs. Hell, an employer might as well legally adopt a potential employee as to hire him in the current environment.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, they have WASTED billions in so-called "job creation" with more to come. And that IS his fault. He's the guy who signs the spending bills.

The wasted Billions in so called 'job creation' is still making me crazy and then taxing wall street another 150BILLION/year for what....JOB CREATION.

It's not that Obama wasn't tossed into a pool of gators, he was, but the manner in which he is addressing some of the possible solutions are without merit. His lack of experience in leading a nation and foreign policy, even though he excels as an orator, with teleprompters, and in other areas he seems to have great difficulty in following up in an effective manner with a multitude of homeland issues. UHOH, I am guilty of using some PC dialog here, but that's okay, he IS our president.

I am still hoping he pulls all of us out of the toilet in a timely manner, my life vest is deflating and I see a giant hand on the "Flush" handle.

 

[Gatekeeper]

Is this what you do gunny? Start new useless threads when it's shown you're fucking clueless in other threads? Why the hell do punks like you even post on a board? Look at this op. It's obvious the Prez doesn't hire or fire people in the workforce but you want to drop it as if it is some form of revelation? Given what I've seen so far I wouldn't be surprised if you made this op because you just now found out the Prez doesn't hire or fire people.

I can't pick on Gunny yet, I am too concerned about the politician from our town to D.C. who is planning another enema for the masses using a 4" pipe.

 

[Murf76]

It's not that Obama wasn't tossed into a pool of gators, he was...

Don't let him buffalo you. He's complained incessantly about the economy "he inherited".
But at the bottom line... he WANTED to be president. He went out there, on the stump, and said that he was the guy for the job, he was the guy with all the answers.

And what have we seen from him instead?... utterly reckless spending and government expansion. That, and consistent, increasingly pathetic.... whining.

 

[VaYank5150]

]It's Obama's policies, the Socialist Democrat agenda, which hurts jobs. [/B] Hell, an employer might as well legally adopt a potential employee as to hire him in the current environment.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, they have WASTED billions in so-called "job creation" with more to come. And that IS his fault. He's the guy who signs the spending bills.

Really? Which policies, specifically and what Socialist Democrat agenda items specifically have hurt job creation. Also, when you respond, please supply data to back up your claims so I won't have to ask you again.

 

[Murf76]

]It's Obama's policies, the Socialist Democrat agenda, which hurts jobs. [/B] Hell, an employer might as well legally adopt a potential employee as to hire him in the current environment.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, they have WASTED billions in so-called "job creation" with more to come. And that IS his fault. He's the guy who signs the spending bills.

Really? Which policies, specifically and what Socialist Democrat agenda items specifically have hurt job creation. Also, when you respond, please supply data to back up your claims so I won't have to ask you again.

Do I look like your personal fucking secretary?

I don't answer to you, you silly dink.


That said, if you think Obama's proposed trifecta of Cap-and-Scam, Card-Check, and Obamacare are incentives for employers to grow their businesses and hire more people... you're completely welcome to expound. I can't promise I won't laugh at you though.

 

[VaYank5150]

]It's Obama's policies, the Socialist Democrat agenda, which hurts jobs. [/B] Hell, an employer might as well legally adopt a potential employee as to hire him in the current environment.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, they have WASTED billions in so-called "job creation" with more to come. And that IS his fault. He's the guy who signs the spending bills.

Really? Which policies, specifically and what Socialist Democrat agenda items specifically have hurt job creation. Also, when you respond, please supply data to back up your claims so I won't have to ask you again.

Do I look like your personal fucking secretary?

I don't answer to you, you silly dink.


That said, if you think Obama's proposed trifecta of Cap-and-Scam, Card-Check, and Obamacare are incentives for employers to grow their businesses and hire more people... you're completely welcome to expound. I can't promise I won't laugh at you though.

Per Message Board etiquette, since it was YOU who made the claims about Obama's policies and agenda hurting job creation, without an iota of evidence to support said claims, and no disclaimer stating that this was simply something you were pulling out of your ass, then it is upon you to provide said evidence. Are you new here, or just partisan and ignorant?

 

[uscitizen]

Well the federal government is hiring faster than the private sector and on average government employees are paid more than private sector employees

So it can be said that the Presidents policies of ever increasing government expansion is "creating" jobs.

Of course all the money to pay for those government employees comes out of our pockets.

Same place the majority of the Bush job gains came from.

 

[Samson]

Well the federal government is hiring faster than the private sector and on average government employees are paid more than private sector employees

So it can be said that the Presidents policies of ever increasing government expansion is "creating" jobs.

Of course all the money to pay for those government employees comes out of our pockets.

Same place the majority of the Bush job gains came from.

Halliburton?

 

[VaYank5150]

Well the federal government is hiring faster than the private sector and on average government employees are paid more than private sector employees

So it can be said that the Presidents policies of ever increasing government expansion is "creating" jobs.

Of course all the money to pay for those government employees comes out of our pockets.

Same place the majority of the Bush job gains came from.

Halliburton?

I THINK you meant KBR...

 

[Skull Pilot]

Well the federal government is hiring faster than the private sector and on average government employees are paid more than private sector employees

So it can be said that the Presidents policies of ever increasing government expansion is "creating" jobs.

Of course all the money to pay for those government employees comes out of our pockets.

Same place the majority of the Bush job gains came from.

George bush isn't president anymore in case you haven't noticed.

And I didn't vote for bush so I don't see your point unless that is you are agreeing with me that the government is getting too big, to intrusive and too expensive that is..

 

[Murf76]

Per Message Board etiquette, since it was YOU who made the claims about Obama's policies and agenda hurting job creation, without an iota of evidence to support said claims, and no disclaimer stating that this was simply something you were pulling out of your ass, then it is upon you to provide said evidence. Are you new here, or just partisan and ignorant?

"Per Message Board etiquette"... Seriously? OMG... there just aren't enough emoticons to convey the depth of my amusement.

What are you?... Emily-freaking-Post? Is that a big concern among Socialist Democrats now?... politeness?... ettiquette?

Oh, right. I remember now. It's new. Since G.W. left office, and your puppet-masters started whining about "incivility" in the face of public protests regarding their disastrous spending and socialist policy agendas.

So, yeah. I'm suuuuurre your own personal "ettiquette" was ever-so-polite and lovely during the Bush administration and in any commentary afterward. I mean, how could it not be? You're not a... a... " PARTISAN", are you?

If I wasn't already bored with you, maybe I'd take a look at your posting history. But alas... I can hardly find anything to interest me if you're already so ignorant that the "trifecta" above must be explained to you from the economic perspective of prospective employers.

Bottom line, neither I nor the voters of America are obligated to explain anything to you. It's enough that Lord Obama will be left to sit and spin in November. Because afterall... not everyone has as much trouble understanding why turning employers into adoptive parents, excessively taxing their success, impairing their ability to operate, increasing their costs, and making policies that will deliver control of private businesses to union hands... might negatively affect employment.

 

[VaYank5150]

Per Message Board etiquette, since it was YOU who made the claims about Obama's policies and agenda hurting job creation, without an iota of evidence to support said claims, and no disclaimer stating that this was simply something you were pulling out of your ass, then it is upon you to provide said evidence. Are you new here, or just partisan and ignorant?

"Per Message Board etiquette"... Seriously? OMG... there just aren't enough emoticons to convey the depth of my amusement.

What are you?... Emily-freaking-Post? Is that a big concern among Socialist Democrats now?... politeness?... ettiquette?

Oh, right. I remember now. It's new. Since G.W. left office, and your puppet-masters started whining about "incivility" in the face of public protests regarding their disastrous spending and socialist policy agendas.

So, yeah. I'm suuuuurre your own personal "ettiquette" was ever-so-polite and lovely during the Bush administration and in any commentary afterward. I mean, how could it not be? You're not a... a... " PARTISAN", are you?

If I wasn't already bored with you, maybe I'd take a look at your posting history. But alas... I can hardly find anything to interest me if you're already so ignorant that the "trifecta" above must be explained to you from the economic perspective of prospective employers.

Bottom line, neither I nor the voters of America are obligated to explain anything to you. It's enough that Lord Obama will be left to sit and spin in November. Because afterall... not everyone has as much trouble understanding why turning employers into adoptive parents, excessively taxing their success, impairing their ability to operate, increasing their costs, and making policies that will deliver control of private businesses to union hands... might negatively affect employment.

Unfortunately, there are already too many emoticons for your use...

And how nice and NOT surprised I am to see you dodge my questions about explaining your bullshit post. Good show, neo-con!

 

[Murf76]

Really? Which policies, specifically and what Socialist Democrat agenda items specifically have hurt job creation. Also, when you respond, please supply data to back up your claims so I won't have to ask you again.

Do I look like your personal fucking secretary?

I don't answer to you, you silly dink.


That said, if you think Obama's proposed trifecta of Cap-and-Scam, Card-Check, and Obamacare are incentives for employers to grow their businesses and hire more people... you're completely welcome to expound. I can't promise I won't laugh at you though.

Per Message Board etiquette, since it was YOU who made the claims about Obama's policies and agenda hurting job creation, without an iota of evidence to support said claims, and no disclaimer stating that this was simply something you were pulling out of your ass, then it is upon you to provide said evidence. Are you new here, or just partisan and ignorant?

Seriously... ??? neg-repping? What are you?... twelve years old?

Weird, that you come in here spouting idiocy and expect no one should laugh at your silly ass, not even after you've insulted them.

Fuck. I couldn't be bothered to "neg-rep" even the looniest bastard in this joint. But then again, I'm not an infant who thinks he should be allowed to dish it out but not take it.

 

[VaYank5150]

Do I look like your personal fucking secretary?

I don't answer to you, you silly dink.


That said, if you think Obama's proposed trifecta of Cap-and-Scam, Card-Check, and Obamacare are incentives for employers to grow their businesses and hire more people... you're completely welcome to expound. I can't promise I won't laugh at you though.

Per Message Board etiquette, since it was YOU who made the claims about Obama's policies and agenda hurting job creation, without an iota of evidence to support said claims, and no disclaimer stating that this was simply something you were pulling out of your ass, then it is upon you to provide said evidence. Are you new here, or just partisan and ignorant?

Seriously... ??? neg-repping? What are you?... twelve years old?

Weird, that you come in here spouting idiocy and expect no one should laugh at your silly ass, not even after you've insulted them.

Fuck. I couldn't be bothered to "neg-rep" even the looniest bastard in this joint. But then again, I'm not an infant who thinks he should be allowed to dish it out but not take it.

And yet you STILL refuse to provide ANYTHING to back up your infantile claims. AMAZING.....