Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh sweetie....your little college website just doesn't get the job done. The GOVERNMENT link I provided includes the latest version. BOTH of his Executive Orders were 1,000% constitutional and the Supreme Court will uphold them.Snowflake....his travel ban is 100% constitutional. What is not constitutional is the idiot left-wing judges who are abusing their power for their left-wing political agenda. Here - learn something before commenting. Section 212(f) from the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952:Wait...so the guy who has had his "travel ban" ruled unconstitutional numerous times now is "restoring constitutional government"?!?
That is federal law sweetcakes. And here it is directly on the government's own website:"Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
Trump's tiny orange dick doesn't even trigger your gag reflex does it?
It's been updated, sugarplum...
U.S. Immigration Legislation: 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act (Hart-Cellar Act)
8 U.S. Code § 1152 - Numerical limitations on individual foreign states
I didn't defend it goofball - I pointed out how idiotic it was. You attempted to compare a legal and proper amendment to the 1st Amendment to a (and I quote) "compromise" of the 2nd Amendment. I pointed out how idiotic that was and that you were comparing apples to oranges because a "compromise" on constitutional rights is intolerable, while a legal and proper amendment is keeping with law.lol yes and in the following post you defended the comparison.*Sigh*. No snowflake...you did. Here it is - post #21:You even made a comparison about the 2nd amendment.
Are you off of your meds or something?Lol um okay. So you would be okay with compromising the 1st amendment with introducing a new amendment? So why do you people throw bitch fits over compromises made to the 2nd amendment? So, tell me, how exactly would Trump amend libel laws? Be specific. You're basically already saying libel laws are flawed.
Oh sweetie....your little college website just doesn't get the job done. The GOVERNMENT link I provided includes the latest version. BOTH of his Executive Orders were 1,000% constitutional and the Supreme Court will uphold them.Snowflake....his travel ban is 100% constitutional. What is not constitutional is the idiot left-wing judges who are abusing their power for their left-wing political agenda. Here - learn something before commenting. Section 212(f) from the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952:Wait...so the guy who has had his "travel ban" ruled unconstitutional numerous times now is "restoring constitutional government"?!?
That is federal law sweetcakes. And here it is directly on the government's own website:"Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
Trump's tiny orange dick doesn't even trigger your gag reflex does it?
It's been updated, sugarplum...
U.S. Immigration Legislation: 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act (Hart-Cellar Act)
8 U.S. Code § 1152 - Numerical limitations on individual foreign states
If there was any justice in the world - both of those judges would be brought up on charges. They knowingly blocked a constitutional order simply because they have a political agenda. They are not upholding the oath they swore.
Not "numerous". Just two left-wing assholes who abuse their power and rule in accordance with their political agenda as opposed to the law.No, Rotty old sock, they weren't...which is why numerous judges have ruled it unconstitutional.
Boom! Puppy here just confirmed it yet again. Those judges ruled based on their feelings about President Trump and his words rather than the legality of the Executive Order (which was 100% constitutional). It's ok puppy....the U.S. Supreme Court will correct it!And Drumph's got nobody to blame but himself and his big, fat, "tellin' it like it is" cats anus mouth. (Oh, and his idiot friend Giuliani) It might have had a chance if he wasn't trying so hard to usurp the 1st Amendment.
Not "numerous". Just two left-wing assholes who abuse their power and rule in accordance with their political agenda as opposed to the law.No, Rotty old sock, they weren't...which is why numerous judges have ruled it unconstitutional.
Boom! Puppy here just confirmed it yet again. Those judges ruled based on their feelings about President Trump and his words rather than the legality of the Executive Order (which was 100% constitutional). It's ok puppy....the U.S. Supreme Court will correct it!And Drumph's got nobody to blame but himself and his big, fat, "tellin' it like it is" cats anus mouth. (Oh, and his idiot friend Giuliani) It might have had a chance if he wasn't trying so hard to usurp the 1st Amendment.
Moot and constitutional.It will likely be moot by the time it is heard, silly boy.
Notice the two key words there, chief? A "compromise" to the U.S. Constitution is not legal. An amendment is. You're comparing apples to oranges because you know you are wrong.So you would be okay with compromising the 1st amendment with introducing a new amendment? So why do you people throw bitch fits over compromises made to the 2nd amendment?
President Trump has done nothing to the 1st Amendment. Absolutely nothing. But that little bitch Pogo has to make stuff up because his homosexuality feels so "threatened" by President Trump. That's what happens when people submerse themselves in propaganda instead of facts.
Apparently you have a reading problem, I said "not Trump's." Perhaps some Republicans in Congress will read the Constitution and our history and realize that Trump could destroy their political party, as John Adams destroyed the first conservative party.President Trump is getting us there. Unfortunately the left is the party of obstruction and is slowing down the process. Patience regent. Patience.I would prefer the old 1789 version and not Trump's.
Yeah...I know what you said jack-ass. And if you weren't an illiterate nitwit, you would realize that what I was saying is that President Trump was taking us to the 1789 version (but that it was taking time because the left is determined to make America fail at all costs).Apparently you have a reading problem, I said "not Trump's." Perhaps some Republicans in Congress will read the Constitution and our history and realize that Trump could destroy their political party, as John Adams destroyed the first conservative party.President Trump is getting us there. Unfortunately the left is the party of obstruction and is slowing down the process. Patience regent. Patience.I would prefer the old 1789 version and not Trump's.
Yep, liberals try to keep the nation progressing in life-style and law.Yeah...I know what you said jack-ass. And if you weren't an illiterate nitwit, you would realize that what I was saying is that President Trump was taking us to the 1789 version (but that it was taking time because the left is determined to make America fail at all costs).Apparently you have a reading problem, I said "not Trump's." Perhaps some Republicans in Congress will read the Constitution and our history and realize that Trump could destroy their political party, as John Adams destroyed the first conservative party.President Trump is getting us there. Unfortunately the left is the party of obstruction and is slowing down the process. Patience regent. Patience.I would prefer the old 1789 version and not Trump's.
The ripple effect from President Trump has been nothing short of astounding. He has even caused the anti-American, anti-constitution progressive crowd to begin to embrace and abide by the U.S. Constitution.
This is how the United States was designed to operate. With each state deciding for themselves what direction to go in. If California wants to implement all kinds of "green" policies - good for them. Go for it. They just don't get to force the rest of society into it.
Democrats Plot ‘Revolution’ to Circumvent Trump’s Paris Decision
Yeah...I know what you said jack-ass. And if you weren't an illiterate nitwit, you would realize that what I was saying is that President Trump was taking us to the 1789 version (but that it was taking time because the left is determined to make America fail at all costs).Apparently you have a reading problem, I said "not Trump's." Perhaps some Republicans in Congress will read the Constitution and our history and realize that Trump could destroy their political party, as John Adams destroyed the first conservative party.President Trump is getting us there. Unfortunately the left is the party of obstruction and is slowing down the process. Patience regent. Patience.I would prefer the old 1789 version and not Trump's.
And by "progressing" the left means a fascist, totalitarian government rationing food, water, housing, healthcare, and opportunity so that we are all "equal" in poverty and misery.Yep, liberals try to keep the nation progressing in life-style and law.
Ignorant response, ignorant post, ignorant poster. You ooze ignorance..Fake news source, fake post, fake poster, paid poster.
What do you get to mooch off of society? How much do you cost society total per month in welfare checks, food stamps, housing, and Medicaid?What do you get per post? .25? .50?
Pledging loyalty is a left-wing fascist requirement. The right doesn't resort to blind obedience.Did you have to pledge loyalty to get this job?
No. He's a great guy too. Have spent a lot of time with him.Is Flynn as short in person as he looks on television?
Unlike progressives - he's modest. He knows when to talk and when not to. His wife Ivanka is actually more beautiful in person than she is on tv. Have spent extensive time with her as well.Does Jared Kushner say anything or is he really a mute?
Well...that's only natural for people with limited IQ's.Questions, so many questions.....
So you're saying that Republicans, are working to create equality with prosperity and joy.And by "progressing" the left means a fascist, totalitarian government rationing food, water, housing, healthcare, and opportunity so that we are all "equal" in poverty and misery.Yep, liberals try to keep the nation progressing in life-style and law.
