Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wow. Just.....wow. bripat9643 posted indisputable photographic evidence, along with a link, which unquestionably proved that the ABC News story was fake.
Why did you shift the focus to CNN? Because bripat9643 already proved ABC ran a fake news story? Talk about moving the goalposts!Well I challenged you yokels to produce a news story that CNN made up and you have failed miserably.
I'm sure you believe Bush bombed the twin towers, while millions of Muslims cheered .. right?It's still fake news. If it isn't live, then they shouldn't say it is.You're so fucking deranged, it's funny. The "Live" at the bottom of the screen is not indicating the interview is live ... it's part of their rotating banner and always says live. I'm watching it right now as they're doing a story about a paraplegic girl and showing her onstage at some dance recital which is clearly prerecorded, yet "live CNN" still remains at the bottom of their screen.LOLWell, they're unhinged; one of the gimps just said he/she/it/mutant thinks CNN has credibility. Pure insanity and self-delusion has taken over these losers; they still think they can get Hillary in.
You were challenged to show fake news reported on CNN and you failed.
Showing fake news on Infowars is easy stuff....
Report: Three Million Votes in Presidential Election Cast by Illegal Aliens
If CNN was fake news, it would have been just as easy for you to post fake news on CNN.
FAKE NEWS: Congresswoman Interviewed “Live” By CNN and MSNBC – At Same Time
CNN and MSNBC were caught in a stark example of fake news during recent interviews of Congresswoman Jackie Speier (D-C.A.) that were supposedly airing “live” – at the same exact time.
An observant television viewer noticed the anomaly and alerted media watchdog, Mark Dice, who broke the story in his latest report.
I'm talking content and you're talking production.
If you read further down the article you would have seen where ABC faked a crime scene investigation.
More fake news, you fucking douche nozzle.
Dice correlated this latest faux pas by the failing corporate media machine to similar recent incidents that included CNN staging a ‘long-distance’ live interview conducted with both subjects in the same parking lot, and also a staged ‘crime scene’ erected by ABC News operatives for a report on Good Morning America, which was nothing more than a small length of caution tape strung between camera stands.
Oh snowflake....he didn't tell any lies. That's why he's been vindicated. Both the DOJ and the WikiLeaks "Vault 7" dump corroborates what he said.Nothing in the OP substantiates the claim of trump be vindicated for the lies he told.
The source is the DOJ and the WikiLeaks "Vault 7" dump. The messenger is InfoWars. Since the left can't dispute the facts, they want to discredit the messenger.Oh snowflake....he didn't tell any lies. That's why he's been vindicated. Both the DOJ and the WikiLeaks "Vault 7" dump corroborates what he said.Nothing in the OP substantiates the claim of trump be vindicated for the lies he told.
You're citing InfoWars as a source. Why not the Globe or the Enquirer. Both are more reliable than InfoWars, and a lot more accurate.
Why do you choose to believe conspiracy theories and lies. You write like a sane intelligent person, except that you buy every lie out of the Liar-in-Chief's mouth. You're smarter than that. I hope.
The source is the DOJ and the WikiLeaks "Vault 7" dump. The messenger is InfoWars. Since the left can't dispute the facts, they want to discredit the messenger.Oh snowflake....he didn't tell any lies. That's why he's been vindicated. Both the DOJ and the WikiLeaks "Vault 7" dump corroborates what he said.Nothing in the OP substantiates the claim of trump be vindicated for the lies he told.
You're citing InfoWars as a source. Why not the Globe or the Enquirer. Both are more reliable than InfoWars, and a lot more accurate.
Why do you choose to believe conspiracy theories and lies. You write like a sane intelligent person, except that you buy every lie out of the Liar-in-Chief's mouth. You're smarter than that. I hope.
However, we were pleasantly surprised at how much time President Trump spent asking very informed questions. The first time the presidents spoke, the questions Trump asked impressed us. “How can you win in this fight [against terrorism]?” he asked. “What do you need to become financially independent?” and “How can American business invest in Afghanistan? How can we develop businesses and mining in your country?”
The source is the DOJ and the WikiLeaks "Vault 7" dump. The messenger is InfoWars. Since the left can't dispute the facts, they want to discredit the messenger.Oh snowflake....he didn't tell any lies. That's why he's been vindicated. Both the DOJ and the WikiLeaks "Vault 7" dump corroborates what he said.Nothing in the OP substantiates the claim of trump be vindicated for the lies he told.
You're citing InfoWars as a source. Why not the Globe or the Enquirer. Both are more reliable than InfoWars, and a lot more accurate.
Why do you choose to believe conspiracy theories and lies. You write like a sane intelligent person, except that you buy every lie out of the Liar-in-Chief's mouth. You're smarter than that. I hope.
The source is the DOJ and the WikiLeaks "Vault 7" dump. The messenger is InfoWars. Since the left can't dispute the facts, they want to discredit the messenger.Oh snowflake....he didn't tell any lies. That's why he's been vindicated. Both the DOJ and the WikiLeaks "Vault 7" dump corroborates what he said.Nothing in the OP substantiates the claim of trump be vindicated for the lies he told.
You're citing InfoWars as a source. Why not the Globe or the Enquirer. Both are more reliable than InfoWars, and a lot more accurate.
Why do you choose to believe conspiracy theories and lies. You write like a sane intelligent person, except that you buy every lie out of the Liar-in-Chief's mouth. You're smarter than that. I hope.
InfoWars is simply not creditable. They aren't a "messenger", they a fictional website. Alex Jones just apologized for his Pizzagate story but only because the owner of the pizza parlour is suing Jones and InfoWars because of the shooting that took place there. Jones takes half truths, or completely fabricated stuff and then spins some fantastic story about what really happened. It's bullshit, designed to incite an emotional response in the gullible.
There is nothing in that article which "vindicates" Trump. There are no "sources" of information quotedl. There are a bunch of suppositions. They suppose that the CIA could have done things just because they have the capability. That's not evidence which will vindicate Trump. That's the desperate attempt of Trump and his supporters to cover up his ties to Russia, which at this point Trump seems desperate to distract people from.
You've elected a lying sack of shit as President. Congratulations. Quit trying to tell us he's not a lying sack of shit. As you keep saying, where's the proof? Where's the proof Donald Trump is an honest, decent man who cares more about America than he does money, wealth and power?
For years you've called Hillary Clinton a lying crook with no proof, no evidence, no charges. And then you elected a lying crook, who you keep tellling us, despite the charges, the fines, the settlements, and the lawsuits, that he's not a lying crook. PROVE IT.
You obviously don't even know what "fake news" is.If you could have posted even one fake news story, you would have. Posting examples of how a reporter staged police tape while she reported on a real news story makes you look retarded.Again ... you're complaining about production and not content.Holyfuckingshit!
Again ... you're talking about production while I'm talking about content. <smh>
They were reporting on a woman held captive against her will. Was that story fake? That they staged a prop for dramatic affect, while unethical at worst (and the woman was removed from field duty as a result) -- that's not fake news. The story was real. What's next, you're gonna complain MSM news is fake news because reporters sometimes wear shorts when shot from waist up?
Fake news is not about production. It's about creating bullshit stories and then portraying them as actual news.
Don't you ever tire of making yourself look like such a fucking idiot?
They create a fake crime scene, you fucking douche nozzle, and then they pretended they were actually at the crime scene. If the "production" is fake, then it's fake news.
Of course, there are also countless stories were CNN just plain lied. Take the Democrat debates where Donna Brazile gave Hillary all the questions before the debate. What could be more fake then that?
The ex-field journalist was reporting on a story about a woman was was held against her will and sexually assaulted for months before being rescued. She also reported on the woman's claims that her abductor killed at least 4 other peoplel
Is that fake news? No, of course not. I wish it was, bur unfortunately, it's real news...
S.C. man charged with keeping woman captive confesses to killing 7 people: sheriff
You're so fucking stupid, you're actually arguing that real news is fake because the ex-field reporter staged a prop despite the news she was reporting being factual.
You clearly don't understand what the term, "fake news," even means. It's not about production -- it's about content.
Like your idiocy about Donna Brazille leaking the questions to Hillary ... that was unconscionable. Brazille was fired for it ... but that too is not "fake news."
If you wanna see what fake news actually looks like, check out Infowars.
Oh, wait, you already do.
POC! POC! POC! POC!
Look at the snowflake clucking like a chicken!
You're spinning, douche bag. Anyone who knows the facts is laughing at you and the MSM fake news. I could post example after example after example, but it's apparent that you will attempt to spin and deflect every one.
You're in denial. Seek help.
Fake new = Proof The OKC Bombing Was An Inside Job
Sorry, douche nozzle, but the stuff I posted is fake news.
Your attempt to spin it isn't fooling anyone.
Screeches the forum idiot who thinks the economy was just fine when Obama became president.Production is part of content...you mental midget! Why do you think ABC did that - because NBC dared them to?!? It was all part of the content they were delivering. It was visual content, you freaking moron.Again ... you're complaining about production and not content.
You're about 51 cards short of a full deck, if ya know what I mean.
LOLWow. Just.....wow. bripat9643 posted indisputable photographic evidence, along with a link, which unquestionably proved that the ABC News story was fake.
You post a link to an InfoWars story without a shred of evidence to back up your claim it was "fake". Do you have any evidence that story was "fake" or is everyone supposed to believe you - a pathological liar?
I shifted nothing, Baghdad Buttplug. You're just too rightarded to keep up with the rest of us. Before bripat9643 brought up ABC news, here was my initial challenge....Why did you shift the focus to CNN? Because bripat9643 already proved ABC ran a fake news story? Talk about moving the goalposts!Well I challenged you yokels to produce a news story that CNN made up and you have failed miserably.
Can't discredit Infowars??Obviously it sucks to not be able to discredit Infowars any more for the Democrats; CNN and their MSM fake news sources are far less credible now, as are their latest waves of 'talking points' the DNC has been feeding them. The spastic gibbering here in this thread is some funny stuff, the tards actually believing they're in a moral or intellectual position to criticize the site.
Says who?
Here they are spreading fake news which cost someone their life...
"Now I want to be clear. Not everybody in the WikiLeaks is involved in this. Clearly. You have to go investigate it for yourself. But I will warn you, this story that’s been the biggest thing on the internet for several weeks, pizzagate as it’s called, is a rabbit hole that is horrifying to go down."-Alex Jones
"Let’s go ahead and go to the report, Pizzagate Is Real. The question is: How real is it? What is it? Something’s going on. Something’s being covered up. It needs to be investigated. To just call it fake news -- these are real WikiLeaks. This is real stuff going on." - Alex Jones
What fake news do you purport came from CNN?
Pace yourself man... He's less than 3mo. into it so you might want to ration out the semi factual ones... as they're all going to get recycled every mo. anyway....
Lie #1Screeches the forum idiot who thinks the economy was just fine when Obama became president.
Lie #2You're about 51 cards short of a full deck, if ya know what I mean.
Lie #3Trump is 0 out of 3, and you idiotically think that translates into vindication.
Hhmmmm....I mention the visual content and you run like a little bitch. What does the Obama economy have to do with the fake news in this report?Screeches the forum idiot who thinks the economy was just fine when Obama became president.Production is part of content...you mental midget! Why do you think ABC did that - because NBC dared them to?!? It was all part of the content they were delivering. It was visual content, you freaking moron.Again ... you're complaining about production and not content.
