- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
I think Paris Hilton should win it next year.
Think higher.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think Paris Hilton should win it next year.
I dont agree with you assertion.Because that is their standard.
dude, you are punting. this is a minor thing. why can't you get over yourself and agree with me that rush limbaugh was not nominated?
There is more than a possibility you are wrong .
In fact it is likely you are your based on prior performance.
It would be better for your position to edit the wiki page to reflect your opinion. then come back and show the change in Norways standard.
except it is YOU that is deluding yourselfYes. Quite funny. I might also suggest you get an adult to explain the concept of "derisive" laughter to you. But that doesn't change the fact that there is no outrage. It's funny.
I'm going to ask you to stop taking my posts out of context. As for this whole outrage vs laughter stuff, whatever. Delude yourself if you care to. The fact you're continuing to respond to my point on this means you really don't want anyone thinking this is outrage. So again, whatever. Feel whatever makes you happy.
no one is angry, we are laughing at how meaningless the Nobel Peace Prize has become
I bet both think the sky is blue, too!Newsflash: What do republicans and Hugo Chavez have in common?
Both think that Obama should not have gotten the Nobel Prize!
and that 2+2=4I bet both think the sky is blue, too!Newsflash: What do republicans and Hugo Chavez have in common?
Both think that Obama should not have gotten the Nobel Prize!
Yes! Thus, the GOP are authoritarian dictators!and that 2+2=4I bet both think the sky is blue, too!Newsflash: What do republicans and Hugo Chavez have in common?
Both think that Obama should not have gotten the Nobel Prize!
"Lastly, there are others who truly work hard at making the world a better and more peaceful place for their fellow man (woman). They do their work in remote locations whether in the jungles, desert, mountains or urban ghettos. They may or may not have any fame. Their work is legitimate. They are truly peacemakers. When they don't receive any recognition for their work, the opportunity to gain more financial support for their good work suffers. Winning the Nobel Peace Prize brings legitimate prestige to those efforts and that results in huge donations to truly worthy causes. Politicians don't need that recognition. It's the non-political peacemakers who really need it.
Again, not Obama's fault that a leftist-driven committee gave him the Nobel Peace Prize purely for political reasons. But it's how he uses that prestige from here on out that will either be his fault or to his credit, depending on what he does and why!"
Well said and dead on the money!!! I am impressed that he at least admitted he does NOT deserve the award and would have really been impressed if he'd refused it and asked that it be given to one of the thousands of such people as you described. I've always wondered how they make their decision of one person over another and it seems that by doing this they gave me more answers than I cared to know. I truely hope he does in fact, as he says he is going to do, donates the money garnered from the award to a WELL DESERVING charity. That is yet to be seen and hopefully there will be FULL disclosure as to who exactly this "charity" will be. A big rep to you for your well put words!!
"Lastly, there are others who truly work hard at making the world a better and more peaceful place for their fellow man (woman). They do their work in remote locations whether in the jungles, desert, mountains or urban ghettos. They may or may not have any fame. Their work is legitimate. They are truly peacemakers. When they don't receive any recognition for their work, the opportunity to gain more financial support for their good work suffers. Winning the Nobel Peace Prize brings legitimate prestige to those efforts and that results in huge donations to truly worthy causes. Politicians don't need that recognition. It's the non-political peacemakers who really need it.
Again, not Obama's fault that a leftist-driven committee gave him the Nobel Peace Prize purely for political reasons. But it's how he uses that prestige from here on out that will either be his fault or to his credit, depending on what he does and why!"
Well said and dead on the money!!! I am impressed that he at least admitted he does NOT deserve the award and would have really been impressed if he'd refused it and asked that it be given to one of the thousands of such people as you described. I've always wondered how they make their decision of one person over another and it seems that by doing this they gave me more answers than I cared to know. I truely hope he does in fact, as he says he is going to do, donates the money garnered from the award to a WELL DESERVING charity. That is yet to be seen and hopefully there will be FULL disclosure as to who exactly this "charity" will be. A big rep to you for your well put words!!
Actually, I think he was using false modesty.
He thinks he deserves the award.
He needed this award badly.
And if you expect full disclosure from Obama don't hold your breath.
The cash will go somewhere that will benefit Obama.
Well said and dead on the money!!! I am impressed that he at least admitted he does NOT deserve the award and would have really been impressed if he'd refused it and asked that it be given to one of the thousands of such people as you described. I've always wondered how they make their decision of one person over another and it seems that by doing this they gave me more answers than I cared to know. I truely hope he does in fact, as he says he is going to do, donates the money garnered from the award to a WELL DESERVING charity. That is yet to be seen and hopefully there will be FULL disclosure as to who exactly this "charity" will be. A big rep to you for your well put words!!
Actually, I think he was using false modesty.
He thinks he deserves the award.
He needed this award badly.
And if you expect full disclosure from Obama don't hold your breath.
The cash will go somewhere that will benefit Obama.
It's funny? * * * *
Yes. Quite funny. I might also suggest you get an adult to explain the concept of "derisive" laughter to you. But that doesn't change the fact that there is no outrage. It's funny.
I think people know that the Nobel comittee is not under Obama's control, and they repsect the humility he showed by stating clearly that he did not deserve the honor.
At least, the latest polling seems to back that up:
RCP Average
Approve: 53.0 / Disapprove: 39.9 / Spread: +13.1
That's a point gain from last week.
uh, did you notice they included 2 more polls that werent included last week that both had his approval at 56%I think people know that the Nobel comittee is not under Obama's control, and they repsect the humility he showed by stating clearly that he did not deserve the honor.
At least, the latest polling seems to back that up:
RCP Average
Approve: 53.0 / Disapprove: 39.9 / Spread: +13.1
That's a point gain from last week.
Jerkoff Shitkey is now quoting Sarah Palin. What a moron.