RadiomanATL
Senior Member
* * * *
Well, to claim that the Left is not founded in Mass Murder, not oriented around and resting upon moral relativism which defines means/ends... and that McVeighs final act as a free man was to practice these Leftist traits, is an argument which lacks a sound, sustainable rationale... one which is constructed in an invalid logical construct and stands on the shifting sands of historical revision... And given that such defines your argument Liability... its yours which is irrational.
One can'treasonably claim another to be a rightwinger, where that person is defined by an act which is typical of, and common to, the character and practices of the Left.
You're falling victim to popular consensus... which as usual is a consensus of the erroneous variety.
You are engaged in gibberish.
Distilled to its essence, your argument is that "no right winger could ever stoop to mass murder." That's honestly too stupid to be credited. McVeigh was a right winger -- he went off the deep end -- and he most certainly DID stoop to mass murder. His actions are not an indictment of the right. But he nevertheless is an example of how a right winger could be responsible for the hideous actions that took so many lives.
Arguing with Pubes is like arguing with Curvy. Both completely oblivious to anything that does not fit into their worldview. Sticking their fingers in their ears going "lalalalala", trying to insulate themselves from the real world.