Nosmo King
Gold Member
Is it necessary to levy taxes?Pure, unadulterated bullshit.I'm not for taxing the rich because of emotion. I'm for taxing teh rich because giving those who need it least a 780 billion dollar break is not good fiscal policy.Shooting fish in a barrel.
The entire "tax the rich" agenda of the libs is focused on jealousy. Period.
"Screw the rich"....Ask them any question as to why they despise those who they view has "having more than the libs feel is a fair share" and you'll get nothing in substance.
You'll get the tired lib talking points about federal deficits, how the wealthy "hoard" their money, how it is unfair that poor people are remaining poor while the rich continue to find ways to increase their revenue flow( read rich getting richer....so WHAT!)
No I don't find it alarming that wealthy people are earning more. Nor do I find it alarming that poor people remain poor.
At the end of the day, the Left sees what others have and they want it. They want it now. This is especially prevalent among younger people. They are not taught the value of hard work. They are taught to complain about that which they do not have and are taught that hard work will get them nowhere. They are taught that those who have success have simply "won the lottery of life"...
Finally the left believes in the zero sum game. Simply put, that there exists in some far off place a magic pile of money. A pie. A place from where the wealthy have unfairly grabbed more than they deserve. That if one has more then another MUST have less.
It's all horse shit.
In my post, I outlined how consumer spending drives the economy. How getting the most money into the most hands will propel this economy. How giving the few the biggest break just does not work out that well, fiscally speaking.
Then your post goes on to tell me and others what I think according to the ideology you subscribe to. Well, that's driving the argument with emotion rather than logic.
Regroup (as the great thinker Palin says) reload and try again. This time without the lopsided projections about what I may or may not think. Try arguing against the middle class consumer and his power to move capital from hand to hand. We know how giving the top moneymakers more money works, and it's feeble and ineffective.
The very notion that people being allowed to keep more of what's theirs to begin with belies your underlying envy and covetousness.
Who died and made you the arbiter of who needs the fruits of their labors and who doesn't, anyways?