POLL: Do You Approve Or Disapprove Of President Trump's Job Performance?

[alang1216]

I thought his campaign brought politics to a new low and was built on his boasts and impossible promises. He has done nothing to change my mind.

in your opinion only

Obviously but I don't recall another candidate who nicknamed his opponents, touted his military expertise being better than the generals, and claimed Mexico would pay for the wall.

 

[Pogo]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".

 

[HappyJoy]

Approve.

He has made the world respect America's opinion and stance.

They may not like it, but they know we will act. Ask NATO members
with their support of the Syrian strikes and their participation. They didn't
do that a year ago.

Gee DJT for LIfe, what would it take for you to disapprove of Trump? Besides some sort of death, not sure if that's yours or Trump's.

 

[harmonica]

I thought his campaign brought politics to a new low and was built on his boasts and impossible promises. He has done nothing to change my mind.

in your opinion only

Obviously but I don't recall another candidate who nicknamed his opponents, touted his military expertise being better than the generals, and claimed Mexico would pay for the wall.

again--in your opinion only
Obama hated America/whites/police --he is worse than Trump

 

[Hossfly]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

 

[alang1216]

again--in your opinion only
Obama hated America/whites/police --he is worse than Trump

So your bar is really, really low?

 

[harmonica]

again--in your opinion only
Obama hated America/whites/police --he is worse than Trump

So your bar is really, really low?

only your opinion
everything bad you claim Trump to be is only your opinion
please provide evidence

 

[Pogo]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach. You don't hire a profiteer to act as a public servant just as you don't hire a public servant to act as a profiteer.

 

[alang1216]

again--in your opinion only
Obama hated America/whites/police --he is worse than Trump

So your bar is really, really low?

only your opinion
everything bad you claim Trump to be is only your opinion
please provide evidence

He nicknamed his opponents, touted his military expertise being better than the generals, and claimed Mexico would pay for the wall. He then turned the war over to the military and has yet to put forward a plan to have Mexico pay for the wall. Those are called facts.

 

[harmonica]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach.

it is?? why ?

 

[alang1216]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach. You don't hire a profiteer to act as a public servant just as you don't hire a public servant to act as a profiteer.

He is familiar with bankruptcy, let's hope that's not his plan for the US since we are the shareholders.

 

[harmonica]

again--in your opinion only
Obama hated America/whites/police --he is worse than Trump

So your bar is really, really low?

only your opinion
everything bad you claim Trump to be is only your opinion
please provide evidence

He nicknamed his opponents, touted his military expertise being better than the generals, and claimed Mexico would pay for the wall. He then turned the war over to the military and has yet to put forward a plan to have Mexico pay for the wall. Those are called facts.

that's bad??? really?? he nicknamed his opponents .??!!! .!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG
that's right up there with Himmler and the Holocaust !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

nick·name
ˈnikˌnām/
noun

1. 1.
   a familiar or humorous name given to a person or thing instead of or as well as the real name.

 

[Hossfly]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach. You don't hire a profiteer to act as a public servant just as you don't hire a public servant to act as a profiteer.

In my eye, Trump is showing concern for the country and the citizens. Politicians are profiteers and the citizens "hire" them and then bitch about it.

 

[harmonica]

again--in your opinion only
Obama hated America/whites/police --he is worse than Trump

So your bar is really, really low?

only your opinion
everything bad you claim Trump to be is only your opinion
please provide evidence

He nicknamed his opponents, touted his military expertise being better than the generals, and claimed Mexico would pay for the wall. He then turned the war over to the military and has yet to put forward a plan to have Mexico pay for the wall. Those are called facts.

those are really bad things...wow ...I have to agree with you

 

[Pogo]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach. You don't hire a profiteer to act as a public servant just as you don't hire a public servant to act as a profiteer.

In my eye, Trump is showing concern for the country and the citizens. Politicians are profiteers and the citizens "hire" them and then bitch about it.

Public servants --- notice I didn't say "politicians" --- are not supposed to be profiteers. Agreed?

---- so then why would we want to substitute the profiteers we're already stuck with ---- with a worse profiteer?

 

[harmonica]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach. You don't hire a profiteer to act as a public servant just as you don't hire a public servant to act as a profiteer.

In my eye, Trump is showing concern for the country and the citizens. Politicians are profiteers and the citizens "hire" them and then bitch about it.

Public servants --- notice I didn't say "politicians" --- are not supposed to be profiteers. Agreed?

---- so then why would we want to substitute the profiteers we're already stuck with ---- with a worse profiteer?

obviously the political way is not working

 

[harmonica]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach. You don't hire a profiteer to act as a public servant just as you don't hire a public servant to act as a profiteer.

I'm waiting for more detail/an answer on why the political way is better

 

[Pogo]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach. You don't hire a profiteer to act as a public servant just as you don't hire a public servant to act as a profiteer.

He is familiar with bankruptcy, let's hope that's not his plan for the US since we are the shareholders.

It may well come to that but it won't be a "plan" so much as "rank incompetence". Just as the casinos (and the steaks, and the water, and the vodka, and the travel site, and the magazine, and the game, and the mail-me-your-pee vitaimins, and the USFL, and the fraudulent fake 'university') were not "plans" but "egomaniacal fantasies".

 

[Hossfly]

Liberal critters: Don't like or approve of the President? Get yer asses to the polls in November instead of haunting the USMB. That is all.

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach. You don't hire a profiteer to act as a public servant just as you don't hire a public servant to act as a profiteer.

In my eye, Trump is showing concern for the country and the citizens. Politicians are profiteers and the citizens "hire" them and then bitch about it.

Public servants --- notice I didn't say "politicians" --- are not supposed to be profiteers. Agreed?

---- so then why would we want to substitute the profiteers we're already stuck with ---- with a worse profiteer?

Because he's serving without pay, he financed his campaign and he's losing money in his business by not being active. The "public servants" came into politics to get rich and to keep getting re-elected until they die filthy rich. They couldn't give a hoot less about their "public."

 

[Pogo]

Unfortunately the problem of Rump has nothing to do with "Liberal" or "Conservative" or "parties" or "voting". It has to do with personal character, basic competence right down to the basics of having some idea how the world works, and fundamental mental stability. None of that is related to anybody named "November".[/QUOTE ]

I distinctly remember him stating many times, "I am not a politician. I'm going to run the country like a business.

Maybe that's why people are leery of Trump. No damn "good ol' boy" politics. I'm all for it.

That's got zero to do with my point, but it does invite analysis. Government and business serve opposite interests; government serves people while business serves itself. "Running the country like a business" is exactly the wrong approach. You don't hire a profiteer to act as a public servant just as you don't hire a public servant to act as a profiteer.

In my eye, Trump is showing concern for the country and the citizens. Politicians are profiteers and the citizens "hire" them and then bitch about it.

Public servants --- notice I didn't say "politicians" --- are not supposed to be profiteers. Agreed?

---- so then why would we want to substitute the profiteers we're already stuck with ---- with a worse profiteer?

Because he's serving without pay, he financed his campaign and he's losing money in his business by not being active. The "public servants" came into politics to get rich and to keep getting re-elected until they die filthy rich. They couldn't give a hoot less about their "public."

There's no argument on the latter, but again --- why rub salt into that wound? If you're about to drive into a wall, do you hit the brakes or the gas?

This is a mentally unbalanced freak who has spent his entire LIFE onanizing Numero Uno at the expense of anybody who gets in the way, who has literally never taken responsibility for a damn thing in his life.. How is that *NOT* a screaming red flag? How in the universe do we plunk a defective character like that into the most responsible job in the world?

Oh and I doooooooooooon't think he's "losing money by not being active" -- but you let us know when he releases those tax returns as he said he would. Actually if past is prologue, he's avoiding losing money through less activity, since he can't embark on more fiascos like casinos and airlines and football leagues and vitamins where you send in your pee.

On the other hand he could be losing money via hush payments to however many Stormy Danielses there are....