Politically Incorrect Mural

[Flanders]

This mural panel can be seen from Main Street in Durham, and is located in the lobby of the local post office. (KIMBERLEY HAAS/CORRESPONDENT) ​

http://www.unionleader.com/storyima...30/AR/0/AR-161129330.jpg&q=82&stamp=&maxw=729

This is where politically correct speech ends:

November 28. 2016 9:12PM
Mural panel at Durham Post Office depicting Native American questioned
By KIMBERLEY HAAS
Union Leader Correspondent

Mural panel at Durham Post Office depicting Native American questioned | New Hampshire​

Changing the truth to make something better is worse than changing the truth to make something harmful. Obviously, the Rev. Larry Brickner-Wood never read Mark Twain who lived in the West when it was being settled.

Such is the genuine Noble Aborigine. I did not get him from books, but from personal observation.​

Noble Red Man

 

[Flanders]

Changing the truth to make something better is worse than changing the truth to make something harmful.

Nothing reaffirms my observation more than the environmental movement:

To be fair, much of her speech focused on issues not pertaining to global warming, but rather appeared to be an indirect missive aimed at Trump and the “fake news” many have suggested played a role in sending him to the White House.

“I believe in being truthful, not neutral. And I believe we must stop banalizing the truth,” she instructed.

However, Amanpour is not the first journalist to suggest the suppression of global warming skeptics. According to the Daily Caller, BBC News trained 200 staffers on how to exclude marginalized views from their coverage, specifically when it came to global warming.​

CNN’s Amanpour: Being ‘truthful, not neutral’ means pushing back on climate skeptics
Tré Goins-Phillips November 29, 2016 5:59 pm

CNN’s Amanpour: Being ‘truthful, not neutral’ means pushing back on climate skeptics​

Amanpour’s “not neutral” is doublespeak for changing the truth. Oddly enough, the media never did anything but lie for manmade climate change, and global warming before that, and Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring before that.

To this day the MSM continues to lie about DDT to shield the United Nations from millions of deaths the WHO is responsible for. The UN jumped all over Rachel Carson’s 1963 “novel”. The UN then assumed the authority to ban DDT. That ban is still in effect even though before her death Carson admitted she made it up.

. . . in 1962, Rachel Carson's book "Silent Spring" created a worldwide scare about DDT, which she claimed was a danger to wildlife. Much of her so-called scientific basis for a DDT ban was soon proven either wrong or exaggerated, and the 1972 edition of her book admitted as much.​

The myth of DDT versus the reality of malaria in Africa
Phyllis Schlafly | Jun 20, 2005

http://townhall.com/columnists/phyl...us_the_reality_of_malaria_in_africa/page/full​

The ban on DDT is responsible for more than one million deaths annually caused by malaria. Most of those deaths are children.

The Toxic Legacy of Rachel Carson
Maureen Mullarkey April 27, 2015

The Toxic Legacy of Rachel Carson » Maureen Mullarkey​

The foundation of politically correct speech is this: Liberals must lie about everything in order to make every item in their agenda look better.

 

[whitehall]

It's hard for democrats to exploit smart Black people anymore so it seems that the Indians are their second choice these days.