I'm not asking you to have an idea about who to believe. I simply stated my reasons for believing the 2 uninvolved ladies instead of the cop trying to save his ass. You and a couple of others seem to be stressed over what I believe and I have no idea as to why.What you think is relevant or not is irrelevant to me. Its only irrelevant to you because you dont want to believe cops do just what I described.
actually it is you who chooses to believe the "eye witnesses". I have no idea who to believe. I, like you, wasn't there.
You are desperately trying to claim that these so called uninvolved ladies have no agenda. Something you could not possibly know.
Any eyewitness can have an agenda, but nobody says we should eliminate eyewitnesses from court.
You have literally know idea what you are talking about. Eyewitness testimony is completely unreliable. Even if Brown's friend didn't intentionally lie, people often see what they want to see, same with the other witnesses.
I've ran a crime scene and asked 10 different witnesses what happened and gotten 10 completely different accounts on numerous occasions. It's not necessarily people lying, it's just that eyewitnesses suck
I think you are talking mostly about face recognition not about easily identifiable "events" like Wilson backing up to Brown and grabbing him by the neck or that Brown raised his hands and was surrendering.