Planned Parenthood Pushes Intensive Sex Education for Kids as Young as 10

Planned Parenthood needs kids to become sexually active as young as possible so there are more unwanted pregnancies and thus more abortions.
Abortion is big business and big revenue to Planned Parenthood.
Follow the money. It's that simple.
That's Bullshit through and through.


About 3% of Planned Parenthood services are abortions. THREE PERCENT.

The majority of their services are for Pap smears, breast exams, and testing / treating for sexually transmitted diseases.
 
I am obsessed with the exploitation of children. If you think teaching 10 year olds about sexual pleasure is fine, I might ask you why. Its not sex. It's rape dingbat.

Paperview is right in that this is the IPPF, but when people here start defending it, that's when we have to worry.

Hey - let's teach 10 year old the "pleasures" of alcohol and drugs too! After all, many people enjoy it.


Stop acting like blowjobs are being offered as a recess activity. It's dumbass control freaks like you who sexualize kids because you are so sex obsessed you can't tell the difference between education and actual fucking.

what he said.
 
Glad you guys aren't teaching my children. That's my job.

I wouldn't be surprised if the same people advocating this kind of curriculum argue against age of consent and child porn laws as well. Sickos.
 
Planned Parenthood needs kids to become sexually active as young as possible so there are more unwanted pregnancies and thus more abortions.
Abortion is big business and big revenue to Planned Parenthood.
Follow the money. It's that simple.
That's Bullshit through and through.


About 3% of Planned Parenthood services are abortions. THREE PERCENT.

The majority of their services are for Pap smears, breast exams, and testing / treating for sexually transmitted diseases.

Services and revenue are two different things.
What does an abortion cost in relation to a swab?
 
Glad you guys aren't teaching my children. That's my job.

I wouldn't be surprised if the same people advocating this kind of curriculum argue against age of consent and child porn laws as well. Sickos.

i teach this class UUA: Our Whole Lives to 12-13 year olds. there are also age appropriate curricula for ages from kindergarten to adulthood. since there was very little information given as to the PP curriculum other than the hysteria and over reaction from the usual suspects, i can't comment on its specifics, but i suspect there are probably some similarities so i guess i would more than likely advocate for their curriculum.

i guess i should just call chris hansen, grab a bag of wine coolers and have a seat.
 
Glad you guys aren't teaching my children. That's my job.

I wouldn't be surprised if the same people advocating this kind of curriculum argue against age of consent and child porn laws as well. Sickos.

I see. So sex is some kind of sinful mystery, not just a fact of life they're surrounded with every day and should understand.

Normal desire and curiosity they can't help but feel is d-d-d-d-dirty, not something they should understand as normal and learn to deal with.

Just having their questions answered with all the facts good and bad is equivalent to rape, molestation and kiddie porn.

Who has the hangup here again?

I'm really, really glad you're not "teaching" my kids. And their future spouses thank you too.
 
Planned Parenthood needs kids to become sexually active as young as possible so there are more unwanted pregnancies and thus more abortions.
Abortion is big business and big revenue to Planned Parenthood.
Follow the money. It's that simple.
That's Bullshit through and through.


About 3% of Planned Parenthood services are abortions. THREE PERCENT.

The majority of their services are for Pap smears, breast exams, and testing / treating for sexually transmitted diseases.

Services and revenue are two different things.
What does an abortion cost in relation to a swab?
That doesn't make sense. First, it is 3%. A small percentage.
The other 97% of services are where the bulk is - a mammogram last I went to the Breast Clinic cost a little over 200.00 with the radiologist reading. Pap and reading can run anywhere from 50. to 200.00. Treating sexually transmitted diseases can run up there as well. (though I don't know the cost, never had any.)

Now, as far as revenue, a lot of PP's clients are low income, and they charge based on what clients are able to pay. The money to make up the difference, is by and large from donations.

Your talking point failed.
 
Last edited:
I see. So sex is some kind of sinful mystery, not just a fact of life they're surrounded with every day and should understand.

Normal desire and curiosity they can't help but feel is d-d-d-d-dirty, not something they should understand as normal and learn to deal with.

Just having their questions answered with all the facts good and bad is equivalent to rape, molestation and kiddie porn.

Who has the hangup here again?

I'm really, really glad you're not "teaching" my kids. And their future spouses thank you too.

Don't try to bother with Chanel there Goldcatt. I don't know what happened, but lately all her threads are all "moral panics" that are overdramatic when compared to the reality of said situation in said thread.

And as we all know, we should never ever tell children anything useful. :eusa_shhh:
 
i teach this class UUA: Our Whole Lives to 12-13 year olds. there are also age appropriate curricula for ages from kindergarten to adulthood. since there was very little information given as to the PP curriculum other than the hysteria and over reaction from the usual suspects, i can't comment on its specifics, but i suspect there are probably some similarities so i guess i would more than likely advocate for their curriculum.

i guess i should just call chris hansen, grab a bag of wine coolers and have a seat.

You're a fucking sicko Del, you don't even deserve those wine coolers. However, I will be a good American and take them off your hands for you. :razz:
 
i teach this class UUA: Our Whole Lives to 12-13 year olds. there are also age appropriate curricula for ages from kindergarten to adulthood. since there was very little information given as to the PP curriculum other than the hysteria and over reaction from the usual suspects, i can't comment on its specifics, but i suspect there are probably some similarities so i guess i would more than likely advocate for their curriculum.

i guess i should just call chris hansen, grab a bag of wine coolers and have a seat.

You're a fucking sicko Del, you don't even deserve those wine coolers. However, I will be a good American and take them off your hands for you. :razz:

otherwise, you're free to walk out that door...
 
i teach this class UUA: Our Whole Lives to 12-13 year olds. there are also age appropriate curricula for ages from kindergarten to adulthood. since there was very little information given as to the PP curriculum other than the hysteria and over reaction from the usual suspects, i can't comment on its specifics, but i suspect there are probably some similarities so i guess i would more than likely advocate for their curriculum.

i guess i should just call chris hansen, grab a bag of wine coolers and have a seat.

You're a fucking sicko Del, you don't even deserve those wine coolers. However, I will be a good American and take them off your hands for you. :razz:

otherwise, you're free to walk out that door...
:lol:
 
Glad you guys aren't teaching my children. That's my job.

I wouldn't be surprised if the same people advocating this kind of curriculum argue against age of consent and child porn laws as well. Sickos.

So you try to equate sensible responsible education to pedophilia? Well, I guess that is a common way to derail be it this issue or same sex marriage. You've basically just said you can't justify your paranoia so instead of being mature enough for reflection you accuse others of child porn.....which breeds more paranoia. You probably hit your kids and try to use the Bible to justify it too. I sure as hell hope someone is teaching your children because there is no way in hell you are capable.
 
Sorry folks but you won't change my mind about how teen pregnancy and single motherhood is helping to destroy this country. And "glorifying" and defending the sexualization of children is part of the problem.

Innocence is to be treasured. Ten year olds should be learning about fractions in school; not masturbation.
 
I see. So sex is some kind of sinful mystery, not just a fact of life they're surrounded with every day and should understand.

Normal desire and curiosity they can't help but feel is d-d-d-d-dirty, not something they should understand as normal and learn to deal with.

Just having their questions answered with all the facts good and bad is equivalent to rape, molestation and kiddie porn.

Who has the hangup here again?

I'm really, really glad you're not "teaching" my kids. And their future spouses thank you too.

Don't try to bother with Chanel there Goldcatt. I don't know what happened, but lately all her threads are all "moral panics" that are overdramatic when compared to the reality of said situation in said thread.

And as we all know, we should never ever tell children anything useful. :eusa_shhh:

I know. According to some of her recent threads, middle school kids are out having sex parties and babies left and right. But teaching them anything realistic about sex is "rape".

If there's a problem, solve it. If it's not a problem, shut up about it. Either way, problem solved. ;)
 
That's Bullshit through and through.


About 3% of Planned Parenthood services are abortions. THREE PERCENT.

The majority of their services are for Pap smears, breast exams, and testing / treating for sexually transmitted diseases.

Services and revenue are two different things.
What does an abortion cost in relation to a swab?
That doesn't make sense. First, it is 3%. A small percentage.
The other 97% of services are where the bulk is - a mammogram last I went to the Breast Clinic cost a little over 200.00 with the radiologist reading. Pap and reading can run anywhere from 50. to 200.00. Treating sexually transmitted diseases can run up there as well. (though I don't know the cost, never had any.)

Now, as far as revenue, a lot of PP's clients are low income, and they charge based on what clients are able to pay. The money to make up the difference, is by and large from donations.

Your talking point failed.

Unless you link me to a P&L statement I'm inclined to stick with my original hypothesis.
Is yours that 3% of the revenue to PP comes from abortions to match up with the percentage of services?
 
Last edited:
Sorry folks but you won't change my mind about how teen pregnancy and single motherhood is helping to destroy this country. And "glorifying" and defending the sexualization of children is part of the problem.

Innocence is to be treasured. Ten year olds should be learning about fractions in school; not masturbation.

How terribly sheltered from the real world children will be then. This is not only about masturbation, if it even is, and you're being intentionally dishonest.

You truly are out of touch with the reality of what is going on in America today. You seem to think teen pregnancy is helping to destroy the country, yet until Bush decided that "no sex only" was the way to go and the numbers reflected that in 2006, teen pregnancy numbers were on a ten year decline.
 
I know. According to some of her recent threads, middle school kids are out having sex parties and babies left and right. But teaching them anything realistic about sex is "rape".

If there's a problem, solve it. If it's not a problem, shut up about it. Either way, problem solved. ;)

Of course. I can be bashed on one hand for being a teenager of sorts (though not so much anymore) but at the same time my first hand experience of being a teenager doesn't count.

Because you know, I sit there in my classes with my hands over my ears. :lol:
 
Services and revenue are two different things.
What does an abortion cost in relation to a swab?
That doesn't make sense. First, it is 3%. A small percentage.
The other 97% of services are where the bulk is - a mammogram last I went to the Breast Clinic cost a little over 200.00 with the radiologist reading. Pap and reading can run anywhere from 50. to 200.00. Treating sexually transmitted diseases can run up there as well. (though I don't know the cost, never had any.)

Now, as far as revenue, a lot of PP's clients are low income, and they charge based on what clients are able to pay. The money to make up the difference, is by and large from donations.

Your talking point failed.

Unless you link me to a P&L statement I'm sticking with my first hand knowledge.
No matter what I link for you, you're still going to push your falsehoods.

You know it and I know it.
 
I know. According to some of her recent threads, middle school kids are out having sex parties and babies left and right. But teaching them anything realistic about sex is "rape".

If there's a problem, solve it. If it's not a problem, shut up about it. Either way, problem solved. ;)

Of course. I can be bashed on one hand for being a teenager of sorts (though not so much anymore) but at the same time my first hand experience of being a teenager doesn't count.

Because you know, I sit there in my classes with my hands over my ears. :lol:

You go to classes? :eusa_eh:

Geek! :D
 

Forum List

Back
Top