Right. You don't know shit. We finally agree on something.I don't know what it is that you think that you're proving here, but you seem to think that if you throw enough equine excrement at the wall , something will stick. It's not sticking. A fetus is not a human being and a woman has the right to terminate the pregnancy. End of storyAnd I take this as confirmation that no a fetus does not have inherent value. It requires desire of the mother to raise?Was I correct in what you are saying. And if not please correct.You are comparing the rights of a fetus to the rights of a slave . It's a logical fallacy as I have pointed out. You can't squirm out of that.
And I'm sorry you can't think hypothetically, but you really can't see the comparison in the arguments of property and privacy?
It was about fetuses and slaves. You couldn't win on that so now it's about property and privacy. The fact is that you can't make a coherent argument about the personhood of a fetus or against abortion so you muddy the waters with irrelevant crap
A fetus is not a person . A born human being is a person and can't be owned
A fetus is part of the woman body hence the right to privacy.
End of story
"I don't know shit about science, but I announce my ignorance as fact! End of story!"
Oh, would that it really WAS the end of your story. I haven't much patience with slapstick comedy.