Peter King proves he is a moron

[National Socialist]

Peter King Says Hillary Clinton Would 'Destroy' Rand Paul and Ted Cruz

Hey ignorant dickhead...it isn't isolationism its NON INTERVENTIONISM...christ this clown is another Romney...the demotards are licking their chops at the chance the idiots will nominate this clown.

 

[Katzndogz]

After seeing Rand Paul destroy Hillary in the Benghazi hearings, it will be enjoyable watching him do the same thing during a campaign. If Hillary ran.

 

[U2Edge]

Peter King Says Hillary Clinton Would 'Destroy' Rand Paul and Ted Cruz

Hey ignorant dickhead...it isn't isolationism its NON INTERVENTIONISM...christ this clown is another Romney...the demotards are licking their chops at the chance the idiots will nominate this clown.

There are certainly better Republican candidates, but Rand Paul is not one of them. If Rand Paul were to somehow receive the Republican nomination for President, I would not vote for him. For the first time in my life, I would actually be voting for a Democrat.

If Rand Paul is the nominee, Reagan Republicans who believe in a strong foreign policy and a strong defense policy will move to the democratic nominee.

 

[National Socialist]

LOL...strong foreign policy aka bomb,invade and murder any nation that dares disagree with the US aka the bully. Go ahead...Rand will win the nomination and the presidency and I won't be voting for him simply because I think he threw his father under the bus and he is to wishy washy on things...I want a pure libertarian not a politician willing to do what he must to get elected. More than likely I would support him in his presidency but its to be seen.It would be hilarious to see "republicans" vote for Hillary ya know the one that covered bengahzi up.

 

[Oddball]

Peter King Says Hillary Clinton Would 'Destroy' Rand Paul and Ted Cruz

Hey ignorant dickhead...it isn't isolationism its NON INTERVENTIONISM...christ this clown is another Romney...the demotards are licking their chops at the chance the idiots will nominate this clown.

There are certainly better Republican candidates, but Rand Paul is not one of them. If Rand Paul were to somehow receive the Republican nomination for President, I would not vote for him. For the first time in my life, I would actually be voting for a Democrat.

If Rand Paul is the nominee, Reagan Republicans who believe in a strong foreign policy and a strong defense policy will move to the democratic nominee.

Well, you neocons have done absolutely jack squat to stop spending and rein in bloated bureaucracy, to go with your internationalist meddling and warmongering, so the Democrat Party is your natural home.

About time you clowns give the GOP back to those who believe in limited gubmint and mean it.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Seeing how the corporate left and the corporate right have unified in their oppositions and degradations of Rand Paul, only proves that is Rand Paul were to run today, he'd trounced any Establishment candidate --- left or right.

 

[U2Edge]

LOL...strong foreign policy aka bomb,invade and murder any nation that dares disagree with the US aka the bully. Go ahead...Rand will win the nomination and the presidency and I won't be voting for him simply because I think he threw his father under the bus and he is to wishy washy on things...I want a pure libertarian not a politician willing to do what he must to get elected. More than likely I would support him in his presidency but its to be seen.It would be hilarious to see "republicans" vote for Hillary ya know the one that covered bengahzi up.

No its called national defense. The pacifist liberal wing of the democratic party doesn't like it, and would prefer to bend over and take in the rear on any part of the planet before defending the nations global interest. Fortunately, they are a minority in that party as your kind typically have been in the Republican party.

Oh, and if you want a pure libertarian politician, for the libertarian candidate. They do have a party and candidate every election cycle.

 

[U2Edge]

Peter King Says Hillary Clinton Would 'Destroy' Rand Paul and Ted Cruz

Hey ignorant dickhead...it isn't isolationism its NON INTERVENTIONISM...christ this clown is another Romney...the demotards are licking their chops at the chance the idiots will nominate this clown.

There are certainly better Republican candidates, but Rand Paul is not one of them. If Rand Paul were to somehow receive the Republican nomination for President, I would not vote for him. For the first time in my life, I would actually be voting for a Democrat.

If Rand Paul is the nominee, Reagan Republicans who believe in a strong foreign policy and a strong defense policy will move to the democratic nominee.

Well, you neocons have done absolutely jack squat to stop spending and rein in bloated bureaucracy, to go with your internationalist meddling and warmongering, so the Democrat Party is your natural home.

About time you clowns give the GOP back to those who believe in limited gubmint and mean it.

The Republican Party is not the libertarian party. Never has been, never will be. Paul and his dad need to learn that its 2013, and not 1812. The United States has global interest that it cannot walk away from. Its survival depends on protecting those interest and the world order it created in the wake of World War II. The United States success in doing that for the past 70 years is the reason why the United States remains the most successful country in world history to this day and the world was not overrun by Soviet Communism or destroyed in a nuclear holocaust.

Donald Sutherland and Jane Fonda will never understand that.

 

[U2Edge]

Seeing how the corporate left and the corporate right have unified in their oppositions and degradations of Rand Paul, only proves that is Rand Paul were to run today, he'd trounced any Establishment candidate --- left or right.

In isolationist libertarian disneyland he might.

 

[Crackerjaxon]

Peter King Says Hillary Clinton Would 'Destroy' Rand Paul and Ted Cruz

Hey ignorant dickhead...it isn't isolationism its NON INTERVENTIONISM...christ this clown is another Romney...the demotards are licking their chops at the chance the idiots will nominate this clown.

There are certainly better Republican candidates, but Rand Paul is not one of them. If Rand Paul were to somehow receive the Republican nomination for President, I would not vote for him. For the first time in my life, I would actually be voting for a Democrat.

If Rand Paul is the nominee, Reagan Republicans who believe in a strong foreign policy and a strong defense policy will move to the democratic nominee.

Goodbye and good riddance.

 

[Crackerjaxon]

There are certainly better Republican candidates, but Rand Paul is not one of them. If Rand Paul were to somehow receive the Republican nomination for President, I would not vote for him. For the first time in my life, I would actually be voting for a Democrat.

If Rand Paul is the nominee, Reagan Republicans who believe in a strong foreign policy and a strong defense policy will move to the democratic nominee.

Well, you neocons have done absolutely jack squat to stop spending and rein in bloated bureaucracy, to go with your internationalist meddling and warmongering, so the Democrat Party is your natural home.

About time you clowns give the GOP back to those who believe in limited gubmint and mean it.

The Republican Party is not the libertarian party. Never has been, never will be. Paul and his dad need to learn that its 2013, and not 1812. The United States has global interest that it cannot walk away from. Its survival depends on protecting those interest and the world order it created in the wake of World War II. The United States success in doing that for the past 70 years is the reason why the United States remains the most successful country in world history to this day and the world was not overrun by Soviet Communism or destroyed in a nuclear holocaust.

Donald Sutherland and Jane Fonda will never understand that.

Warmongers need to learn that we cannot continue to bankrupt the nation with military adventurism.

 

[NightFox]

Peter King proves he is a moron

Are there any rational Americans left that require more proof beyond the mountain of it that is already available?

 

[Oddball]

There are certainly better Republican candidates, but Rand Paul is not one of them. If Rand Paul were to somehow receive the Republican nomination for President, I would not vote for him. For the first time in my life, I would actually be voting for a Democrat.

If Rand Paul is the nominee, Reagan Republicans who believe in a strong foreign policy and a strong defense policy will move to the democratic nominee.

Well, you neocons have done absolutely jack squat to stop spending and rein in bloated bureaucracy, to go with your internationalist meddling and warmongering, so the Democrat Party is your natural home.

About time you clowns give the GOP back to those who believe in limited gubmint and mean it.

The Republican Party is not the libertarian party. Never has been, never will be. Paul and his dad need to learn that its 2013, and not 1812. The United States has global interest that it cannot walk away from. Its survival depends on protecting those interest and the world order it created in the wake of World War II. The United States success in doing that for the past 70 years is the reason why the United States remains the most successful country in world history to this day and the world was not overrun by Soviet Communism or destroyed in a nuclear holocaust.

Donald Sutherland and Jane Fonda will never understand that.

The Republican Party isn't even the Republican Party.....It's nothing more than a cheap imitation of the Democrat Party.

Neocons like you would be hard pressed to get to the left of progressive/socialist wankers Woodrow Wilson and LBJ.

 

[Pete7469]

Peter King Says Hillary Clinton Would 'Destroy' Rand Paul and Ted Cruz

Hey ignorant dickhead...it isn't isolationism its NON INTERVENTIONISM...christ this clown is another Romney...the demotards are licking their chops at the chance the idiots will nominate this clown.

There are certainly better Republican candidates, but Rand Paul is not one of them. If Rand Paul were to somehow receive the Republican nomination for President, I would not vote for him. For the first time in my life, I would actually be voting for a Democrat.

If Rand Paul is the nominee, Reagan Republicans who believe in a strong foreign policy and a strong defense policy will move to the democratic nominee.

Yeah, that makes sense. Vote for the guy who would continue the moonbat messiah's gutting of the military and pathetic foreign policy of appeasement, bowing to despots and arming jihadists....

Rand Paul isn't a globalist, and neither was Reagan. You don't need to be a UN stooge like the Bush Family to have a strong foreign policy. Regardless, I've never really heard what RP has to say about interventionist foreign policy where we drag the UN leftists in to dictate how we do shit.

 

[Synthaholic]

Seeing how the corporate left and the corporate right have unified in their oppositions and degradations of Rand Paul, only proves that is Rand Paul were to run today, he'd trounced any Establishment candidate --- left or right.

Rand Paul is a lightweight thinker.

He's only there because of his dad's name.

 

[Oddball]

Rand would kick King's and Biden's skinny asses and The Hildabeast's fat ass up and down the street.

 

[NightFox]

Rand would kick King's and Biden's skinny asses and The Hildabeast's fat ass up and down the street.

I dunno, Hillary reportedly has a mean far left hook and can take a lot of abuse.

 

[U2Edge]

Peter King Says Hillary Clinton Would 'Destroy' Rand Paul and Ted Cruz

Hey ignorant dickhead...it isn't isolationism its NON INTERVENTIONISM...christ this clown is another Romney...the demotards are licking their chops at the chance the idiots will nominate this clown.

There are certainly better Republican candidates, but Rand Paul is not one of them. If Rand Paul were to somehow receive the Republican nomination for President, I would not vote for him. For the first time in my life, I would actually be voting for a Democrat.

If Rand Paul is the nominee, Reagan Republicans who believe in a strong foreign policy and a strong defense policy will move to the democratic nominee.

Yeah, that makes sense. Vote for the guy who would continue the moonbat messiah's gutting of the military and pathetic foreign policy of appeasement, bowing to despots and arming jihadists....

Rand Paul isn't a globalist, and neither was Reagan. You don't need to be a UN stooge like the Bush Family to have a strong foreign policy. Regardless, I've never really heard what RP has to say about interventionist foreign policy where we drag the UN leftists in to dictate how we do shit.

1. Rand Paul is indeed a defense gutter. Like old time Republicans prior to Reagan, he would prefer to sacrifice the US Military at the alter of no taxes and a balanced budget. Its that type of crap thinking that led the United States to be so incredibly unprepared for World War I, World War II and the Korean War.

2. non-interventionism is the pure definition of foreign policy appeasement. Neville Chamberlain at Munich indeed.

3. Reagan believed in a strong foreign policy and worked to strengthen US alliances all around the world to improve NATO and the worlds defenses against Soviet conquest and invasion. The very nature of doing that requires strong global intervention.

 

[U2Edge]

Well, you neocons have done absolutely jack squat to stop spending and rein in bloated bureaucracy, to go with your internationalist meddling and warmongering, so the Democrat Party is your natural home.

About time you clowns give the GOP back to those who believe in limited gubmint and mean it.

The Republican Party is not the libertarian party. Never has been, never will be. Paul and his dad need to learn that its 2013, and not 1812. The United States has global interest that it cannot walk away from. Its survival depends on protecting those interest and the world order it created in the wake of World War II. The United States success in doing that for the past 70 years is the reason why the United States remains the most successful country in world history to this day and the world was not overrun by Soviet Communism or destroyed in a nuclear holocaust.

Donald Sutherland and Jane Fonda will never understand that.

The Republican Party isn't even the Republican Party.....It's nothing more than a cheap imitation of the Democrat Party.

Neocons like you would be hard pressed to get to the left of progressive/socialist wankers Woodrow Wilson and LBJ.

Wilson and LBJ were far better than the alternative back when they were both in office.

Both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are far better than anything other parties or independents have to offer.

 

[U2Edge]

Well, you neocons have done absolutely jack squat to stop spending and rein in bloated bureaucracy, to go with your internationalist meddling and warmongering, so the Democrat Party is your natural home.

About time you clowns give the GOP back to those who believe in limited gubmint and mean it.

The Republican Party is not the libertarian party. Never has been, never will be. Paul and his dad need to learn that its 2013, and not 1812. The United States has global interest that it cannot walk away from. Its survival depends on protecting those interest and the world order it created in the wake of World War II. The United States success in doing that for the past 70 years is the reason why the United States remains the most successful country in world history to this day and the world was not overrun by Soviet Communism or destroyed in a nuclear holocaust.

Donald Sutherland and Jane Fonda will never understand that.

Warmongers need to learn that we cannot continue to bankrupt the nation with military adventurism.

Protecting the United States is NEVER adventurism and preserves the future prosperity and freedom of the country!