Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,601
- 58,750
- 2,645
"parent to offspring where the offspring is an entirely a new species that will reproduce from that time foreward.".You missed a lot but this one you did get.What is it you think I missed? Is there not a DNA code in singled celled life forms?
You fail to understand that evolution is NOT a random process. Natural selection is the key. If you had an large box of letters and spilled them onto a table the odds that they would match Shakespare's Hamlet are infinitesimally small. However some would match and if you removed every letter that didn't match and spilled them out again some more would match. It wouldn't take very long to get to Hamlet with this selective pressure.Is DNA random? What does science say about randomness?
Every bone is a transitional bone, every fossil a transitional fossil.Where are all of those "transitional" bones?
Not difficult at all if you have enough time.How difficult is it for an eye to form correctly?
No and it didn't.Can it happen by chance?
All bullshit alang. Natural selection had nothing to do with the beginning of life on this planet. Adapting is not the same thing as mutating.
One single cell is not, as Darwin believed, simple life form to complex forms. It is complex from the very first living cell. To create a different species from one that already exists, DNA would have to mutate, and continue to make the exact mistake without mutating again for millions of years. DNA attempts to self correct.
No, not every bone is transitional. To the contrary, my femur is the same as my mother's femur, because my DNA knows how to create one. So did my mother's DNA. Neither DNA broke with tradition. There are no 1/2 monkey 1/2 human remains to be found when there should be millions of them.
As for the eye, it is extremely complex form the git go. Even Darwin disagrees with you:
Charles Darwin, the founder of evolutionary theory, wrote in regards to the difficulties of applying evolution to the eye. “… that the eye … could have been formed by natural selection seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.”
Had Darwin known about DNA we would have never heard of Darwin.
To create a different species from one that already exists, DNA would have to mutate, and continue to make the exact mistake without mutating again for millions of years.
that is not correct, DNA is not the determining factor but the physical mechanism to bring about the change - the metaphysical component of the cell, the cell itself determines the procedures progression to dictate the information the DNA uses to make the alternations. the stored metaphysical information may in a final step in certain circumstances create an entirely new species in a single step without an intermediary trail. parent to offspring where the offspring is an entirely a new species that will reproduce from that time foreward.
That has never happened. Not once. There is more information stored in the DNA and RNA of a cell than would ever be necessary to guide the entire life and development of an organism, and much of it is simply dormant. There is absolutely no need to introduce this magical nonsense.