Pennsylvania democrat party court....Trump people can be in the room, but don't get to actually see the count.

[2aguy]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

Sorry Blinky, there is no "democrat party controlled court" anywhere, not the least of which reason is that there is no "democrat party".

As for the 336-year-old Pennsylvania Supreme Court, its Chief Justice is a Republican. I'm pretty sure that is a party.

NONE of which is relevant anyway since you have utterly FAILED to show that any action it took was motivated by political parties, including the fake ones that exist only in your head.

Hey....you dumb ass.....I just checked the party affiliation of the Justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme court, you dumb ass.....

You know we have this thing called the internet now........and for now you can actually find things out when morons like you make claims that are lies...

5 of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court are democrats, 2 are republicans....you dumb ass.

 

[Skylar]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

And yet still lost the House......lost ground in the Senate.....and lost the Presidency.

So, um.....are you 'tired of winning' yet?

 

[Coyote]

The only fraud that seems to be occurring is so blatantly undemocratic, I can't believe people are willing to go along with it.

Leaning on the Wayne County Republican certifiers to get them to refuse to certify the election so the Republican legislatures can appoint electors...

Lindsey Graham calling the Georgia AG (Republican) to see if he can use his authority discard thousands of legitimate ballots because a few were problematic...

It's unreal. Truly unreal.

 

[2aguy]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

And yet still lost the House......lost ground in the Senate.....and lost the Presidency.

So, um.....are you 'tired of winning' yet?

Hey, dipshit.....we gained in the House, and had lots of seats up in the Senate....and the democrats stealing the election is not winning an election.......you dumb ass...

Where was the repudiation of Trump, you shitstain...

 

[Skylar]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

And yet still lost the House......lost ground in the Senate.....and lost the Presidency.

So, um.....are you 'tired of winning' yet?

Hey, dipshit.....we gained in the House, and had lots of seats up in the Senate....and the democrats stealing the election is not winning an election.......you dumb ass...

Where was the repudiation of Trump, you shitstain...

You lost the House. You lost ground in the Senate. You lost the presidency.

Thank you, TRUMP!

 

[Pogo]

The only fraud that seems to be occurring is so blatantly undemocratic, I can't believe people are willing to go along with it.

Leaning on the Wayne County Republican certifiers to get them to refuse to certify the election so the Republican legislatures can appoint electors...

Lindsey Graham calling the Georgia AG (Republican) to see if he can use his authority discard thousands of legitimate ballots because a few were problematic...

It's unreal. Truly unreal.

Don't know how widely it was reported but Lindsey also made the same calls to Nevada and AridZona. You know, "just curious" about how their procedures work, phoning up officials in states not his own that were obviously very busy, for info that any of us could look up on the internets at any time.

Yet he made no calls to, say, his neighboring state of North Carolina, where a close race was not being led by Biden. Just the close states where Biden had a lead. But hey I'm sure he was going to get to NC eventually, as he was calling them in.... uh, alphabetical order. Yeah, that's the ticket.

 

[Beef_Supreme]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

So observers don’t need to be allowed close enough to actually observe.
Awesome.
So when the law calls them “observers”, what exactly are they “observing” from across the room? That counting is occurring?
This is essentially like saying if you want to watch a football game, you can stand in the parking lot and look at the stadium.

 

[Pogo]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

And yet still lost the House......lost ground in the Senate.....and lost the Presidency.

So, um.....are you 'tired of winning' yet?

Hey, dipshit.....we gained in the House, and had lots of seats up in the Senate....and the democrats stealing the election is not winning an election.......you dumb ass...

Where was the repudiation of Trump, you shitstain...

Cultists are SO f'n helpless...

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

As it should be. Just like with GA. The state has certified poll watchers from each party that are vetted long before the election. This is just an exercise in disruption. Getting someone close enough to record video to plop up on one of a myriad of alt-right websites and stir up conspiracy theories. The election was free and fair. Trump lost. Deal with it.

oh if this were being done to the left you'd be screaming like a stuck pig.

only difference is - i would agree it's wrong to do this. PERIOD.

So why didn't Clinton make a big deal out of it four years ago? When the vote margin was infinitely smaller? 77,000 votes across three states. I didn't hear anyone crying "rigged"..or "fraud". I remember a gracious concession and a smooth transition.

 

[Pogo]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

As it should be. Just like with GA. The state has certified poll watchers from each party that are vetted long before the election. This is just an exercise in disruption. Getting someone close enough to record video to plop up on one of a myriad of alt-right websites and stir up conspiracy theories. The election was free and fair. Trump lost. Deal with it.

oh if this were being done to the left you'd be screaming like a stuck pig.

only difference is - i would agree it's wrong to do this. PERIOD.

So why didn't Clinton make a big deal out of it four years ago? When the vote margin was infinitely smaller? 77,000 votes across three states. I didn't hear anyone crying "rigged"..or "fraud". I remember a gracious concession and a smooth transition.

Biden not only flipped those three states, he's more than tripled the Rump combined margin therein.

Yet the far-more-successful one gets the whiners. UNreal.

 

[Skylar]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

As it should be. Just like with GA. The state has certified poll watchers from each party that are vetted long before the election. This is just an exercise in disruption. Getting someone close enough to record video to plop up on one of a myriad of alt-right websites and stir up conspiracy theories. The election was free and fair. Trump lost. Deal with it.

oh if this were being done to the left you'd be screaming like a stuck pig.

only difference is - i would agree it's wrong to do this. PERIOD.

So why didn't Clinton make a big deal out of it four years ago? When the vote margin was infinitely smaller? 77,000 votes across three states. I didn't hear anyone crying "rigged"..or "fraud". I remember a gracious concession and a smooth transition.

Because the GOP has stripped itself any vestige of ideals or unifying values save one: that everyone is unfair to conservative.

It should be called the 'Head Down, Ass Up' party at this point, as the party platform is little more than an exhaustive list of all the people that are fucking them.

A 'stolen election'? Its just another dick in the ass for conservatives to whimper about, yet another in an endless myriad of ways that they are victims.

They should scrap the elephant and just make their party's symbol an 8-ball gag.

 

[AZrailwhale]

I think what needs to happen is high def video surveillance of every vote counter. A camera right overhead focused on the workspace transmitting every action the counter takes to a set of servers; one controlled by every party in the election. The Casinos can do it to spot cheaters, aren't our elections at least as important as card games?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

As it should be. Just like with GA. The state has certified poll watchers from each party that are vetted long before the election. This is just an exercise in disruption. Getting someone close enough to record video to plop up on one of a myriad of alt-right websites and stir up conspiracy theories. The election was free and fair. Trump lost. Deal with it.

Really? whats the definition of an observer? Conspiracy theories are stirred up by secrecy not openness.
How can posting the opening of ballots on a website...as boring and non eventful as that is, possibly create controversy? Are you listening to yourself?

What creates controversy is computers being shut down in the middle of the night, then the vote count shifting the opposite direction the next morning.
Then you can have any dufuss with a certificate tell everyone they didnt see any fraud. You cant see what you dont look for.

Further more we don't need people lecturing us on the danger of conspiracy theories when those SAME PEOPLE are the ones living off one big conspiracy theory for the last 4 years and trying their best to cripple a presidency.

Keep coping bro....

 

[toobfreak]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

Well, you have to understand you're dealing with a corrupt democrat state politicia whose center is seated in a dirty city like Philadelphia. Another reason why all of this should be STANDARDIZED by federal laws-- -- HEY, it's a federal election. Fuck the state.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

This is why the election fraud claims will have to be decided by the Supreme Court of the US. This decision by a State Supreme Court is disgraceful, playing games with wording and ignoring the obvious intent of what OBSERVER means.

One must prove fraud and have it ruled on by a lower court judge before one can appeal and then take it to the SC.
So far, all fraud lawsuits have been thrown out. Nothing for the appeals court or the SC to decide. Again, I don't know why you are hanging all your hopes on this. It ain't goin there.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

This is why the election fraud claims will have to be decided by the Supreme Court of the US. This decision by a State Supreme Court is disgraceful, playing games with wording and ignoring the obvious intent of what OBSERVER means.

One must prove fraud and have it ruled on by a lower court judge before one can appeal and then take it to the SC.
So far, all fraud lawsuits have been thrown out. Nothing for the appeals court or the SC to decide. Again, I don't know why you are hanging all your hopes on this. It ain't goin there.

And, there's no way to prove fraud when no one can watch the process.

Thank you for proving the Penn SC ruling is BULLSHIT!!!

 

[Claudette]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

Sorry Blinky, there is no "democrat party controlled court" anywhere, not the least of which reason is that there is no "democrat party".

As for the 336-year-old Pennsylvania Supreme Court, its Chief Justice is a Republican. I'm pretty sure that is a party.

NONE of which is relevant anyway since you have utterly FAILED to show that any action it took was motivated by political parties, including the fake ones that exist only in your head.

Hey....you dumb ass.....I just checked the party affiliation of the Justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme court, you dumb ass.....

You know we have this thing called the internet now........and for now you can actually find things out when morons like you make claims that are lies...

5 of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court are democrats, 2 are republicans....you dumb ass.

No wonder they passed that stupid rule. This election is illegitimate as hell and anyone with a working brain cell knows this.

 

[Pogo]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

Sorry Blinky, there is no "democrat party controlled court" anywhere, not the least of which reason is that there is no "democrat party".

As for the 336-year-old Pennsylvania Supreme Court, its Chief Justice is a Republican. I'm pretty sure that is a party.

NONE of which is relevant anyway since you have utterly FAILED to show that any action it took was motivated by political parties, including the fake ones that exist only in your head.

Hey....you dumb ass.....I just checked the party affiliation of the Justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme court, you dumb ass.....

You know we have this thing called the internet now........and for now you can actually find things out when morons like you make claims that are lies...

5 of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court are democrats, 2 are republicans....you dumb ass.

No wonder they passed that stupid rule. This election is illegitimate as hell and anyone with a working brain cell knows this.

Once AGAIN neither you nor the OP has shown a shred of evidence that anything the Court decided was politically motivated. His entire basis is the house of cards of an Ass-ociation Fallacy.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

This is why the election fraud claims will have to be decided by the Supreme Court of the US. This decision by a State Supreme Court is disgraceful, playing games with wording and ignoring the obvious intent of what OBSERVER means.

One must prove fraud and have it ruled on by a lower court judge before one can appeal and then take it to the SC.
So far, all fraud lawsuits have been thrown out. Nothing for the appeals court or the SC to decide. Again, I don't know why you are hanging all your hopes on this. It ain't goin there.

And, there's no way to prove fraud when no one can watch the process.

Thank you for proving the Penn SC ruling is BULLSHIT!!!

They are allowed to watch the process. They just ruled that they aren't allowed to just stand as close as they want. The county election board decides that.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules Trump campaign observers had no right to stand within a specific distance during Philadelphia ballot processing | CNN Politics

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled 5-2 that a Trump campaign ballot processing observer in Philadelphia had no right to stand any particular distance away from election workers, and it's up to counties to decide where poll watchers can stand.

www.cnn.com

Honestly, the butthurt emanating from Trump supporters is bordering on embarrassing.

 

[toobfreak]

Yeah....about those fake calls from the biden puppet about unity....F**k you........here we have a democrat party controlled court ruling that Trump ballot observers do not have the right to actually look at the ballots as they are being counted...

So again....you are stealing the election....F**k you.........

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign’s complaint that observers were not given adequate access to watch the counting process, holding Tuesday that the law did not specify that observers had to be close enough to see details.

Observers complained that they were kept so far away in Philadelphia that they could not see the markings on absentee ballot envelopes.

The campaign lost at the trial court, won on appeal at the commonwealth court, but lost again at the state Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Trump Argument: Observers Just Have to 'Remain in the Room'

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the Trump campaign's complaint about observers, saying the law did not specify a particular distance.

www.breitbart.com

This is why the election fraud claims will have to be decided by the Supreme Court of the US. This decision by a State Supreme Court is disgraceful, playing games with wording and ignoring the obvious intent of what OBSERVER means.

One must prove fraud and have it ruled on by a lower court judge before one can appeal and then take it to the SC.
So far, all fraud lawsuits have been thrown out. Nothing for the appeals court or the SC to decide. Again, I don't know why you are hanging all your hopes on this. It ain't goin there.

Hey, Jack-o-Lantern-- -- How do you PROVE fraud, Jacko, then need to have it ruled on by a higher court? If it was proven, you wouldn't NEED the higher court, Jack. When the court throws out your case, they are ruling that the case did not hold merit. Top lawyers and federal prosecutors are not in the business of taking cases that doesn't even have legal standing, fool, I mean, Jack. The fact that these lower courts are ruling against them is half the reason why these cases will be taken TO a higher court.