Pelosi invites Trump to give State of the Union address on February 5

Oh I would love that. Considering that communism is deader than dead.

Sorry, but no. It has been renamed.

Check out the CPUSA site, and the current Democrat agenda. There is no difference.

Which is why the Communist Party of America supported the last three Democrat presidential nominees and strongly supported Sanders.

All 200 members?
3K4Zk9M.jpg
Which is untrue as Lenin wanted to let capitalism in control first, yet he died and it didn't happen...
Statism-Ideas-So-Good-Theyre-Mandatory.jpg
 
Sorry, but no. It has been renamed.

Check out the CPUSA site, and the current Democrat agenda. There is no difference.

Which is why the Communist Party of America supported the last three Democrat presidential nominees and strongly supported Sanders.

All 200 members?
3K4Zk9M.jpg
Which is untrue as Lenin wanted to let capitalism in control first, yet he died and it didn't happen...
Socialism, communism same difference… Progressives are just too stupid to realize there is no difference
Again another untrue statement..
In communism the workers own the means of production in socialism the state owns the means of production......Now who is stupid, stupid?
 
Which is why the Communist Party of America supported the last three Democrat presidential nominees and strongly supported Sanders.

All 200 members?
3K4Zk9M.jpg
Which is untrue as Lenin wanted to let capitalism in control first, yet he died and it didn't happen...
Socialism, communism same difference… Progressives are just too stupid to realize there is no difference
Again another untrue statement..
In communism the workers own the means of production in socialism the state owns the means of production......Now who is stupid, stupid?
Statism-Ideas-So-Good-Theyre-Mandatory.jpg
 
Sorry, but no. It has been renamed.

Check out the CPUSA site, and the current Democrat agenda. There is no difference.

Which is why the Communist Party of America supported the last three Democrat presidential nominees and strongly supported Sanders.

All 200 members?
3K4Zk9M.jpg
Which is untrue as Lenin wanted to let capitalism in control first, yet he died and it didn't happen...
Statism-Ideas-So-Good-Theyre-Mandatory.jpg
Like religion...Authoritarianism is alive and well on both sides of the political aisle, there is not shortage...
 
Millions of Americans want nothing to do with a socialist state… What part of that simple fact progressives don’t get.... lol
 
Aw, come on guys. Ms. Pelosi finally saw the light when her disapproval ratings went up. She's over her drunk-with-power binges for the time being. She knows America demands a Speaker of the House who will be a positive force in establishment of agreement and not of chaos. It took her some time, but she caught on and is now at least going through the motions of returning to civility and peace on earth. At least, I hope so. If she does not start soliciting peace, the results will be in shortly. But let's give her the benefit of the doubt. First thing you know, MAGA will be her idea. <giggle>
 
Sorry, but no. It has been renamed.

Check out the CPUSA site, and the current Democrat agenda. There is no difference.

Which is why the Communist Party of America supported the last three Democrat presidential nominees and strongly supported Sanders.

All 200 members?
3K4Zk9M.jpg
Which is untrue as Lenin wanted to let capitalism in control first, yet he died and it didn't happen...
Statism-Ideas-So-Good-Theyre-Mandatory.jpg

Which is why the Communist Party of America supported the last three Democrat presidential nominees and strongly supported Sanders.

All 200 members?
3K4Zk9M.jpg
Which is untrue as Lenin wanted to let capitalism in control first, yet he died and it didn't happen...
Socialism, communism same difference… Progressives are just too stupid to realize there is no difference
Again another untrue statement..
In communism the workers own the means of production in socialism the state owns the means of production......Now who is stupid, stupid?

Moonglow believes he has a point, but of course, what he really means is------->HAD a point on Socialism.

You see, Leftists in this country figured out that taking over business in this country would lead to the DIRECT definition that Rustic posted, so the Left devised a DIFFERENT way to control business, without actually owning it, so that people like Moonglow could with a straight face, deny, deny, deny.

And what is the way Leftists devised? It is called, REGULATION, and TAXES-)

How do you FORCE business to say...…...get rid of coal without owning the power company? REGULATE and TAX the hell out of it, so the power company has to do what you say! Same goes for HEALTHCARE!

Would ANY of these industries have done this without government intervention? Of course not; not with the feeble facts the Left gives for them doing so.

So what to do if you are Ears Obysmal, hmmmmmmmmmm. Wait, I know, just REGULATE and TAX the hell out of what you don't want, then Moonglow can smugly sit there and proclaim------------->but the government doesn't own it. True, very true, and yet, they seem to be able to FORCE business to do anything they want, now don't they!

Doubt me?

Then ask the former CEO of General Motors, who the government FORCED out, even though they didn't own their means of production, lolol. All because GM didn't see business practice the way Ears did, lol. Now you know why Ford didn't take the free money the government was offering.
 
Which is why the Communist Party of America supported the last three Democrat presidential nominees and strongly supported Sanders.

All 200 members?
3K4Zk9M.jpg
Which is untrue as Lenin wanted to let capitalism in control first, yet he died and it didn't happen...
Statism-Ideas-So-Good-Theyre-Mandatory.jpg
Like religion...Authoritarianism is alive and well on both sides of the political aisle, there is not shortage...
What religion are you talking about? In your mind, I assume all religions are pretty much the same except Christianity is the worse, huh.
 
Millions of Americans want nothing to do with a socialist state… What part of that simple fact progressives don’t get.... lol

Democratic socialism is the most successful form of government in the wold. Americans are already living in a socialist state and the "millions of Americans" you speak of have been brainwashed by right wing talk radio and have no idea that Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are socialist programs. Americans may say they don't want a socialist state, because right wingers have vilified the term but don't try to take Obamacare away from them.
 
Were I Trump, I would have two versions of the speech. One to be distributed to the press and Congress early in the day, as always, so media commentary and Democrat rebuttals can be developed.

The second would be the one I would actually read on the live feed, one that would de-pants the Democrats in front of a billion worldwide viewers. It would include a lesson in 20th Century Communism, its current resurrection in the Democratic Party, and the danger that it presents to 21st Century America.

Oh I would love that. Considering that communism is deader than dead. All of the former communist states that didn't go full throttle to democracy, devolved into authoritarian dictatorships and oligarchies, long ago. Trump would look like a total idiot, which is just business as usual lately.
China and Cuba would beg to differ
Everywhere else full blown communism is in retreat.
But now they call it Democratic Socialism.
That's a kinder/friendlier version.
 
Which is why the Communist Party of America supported the last three Democrat presidential nominees and strongly supported Sanders.

All 200 members?
3K4Zk9M.jpg
Which is untrue as Lenin wanted to let capitalism in control first, yet he died and it didn't happen...
Statism-Ideas-So-Good-Theyre-Mandatory.jpg

Which is untrue as Lenin wanted to let capitalism in control first, yet he died and it didn't happen...
Socialism, communism same difference… Progressives are just too stupid to realize there is no difference
Again another untrue statement..
In communism the workers own the means of production in socialism the state owns the means of production......Now who is stupid, stupid?

Moonglow believes he has a point, but of course, what he really means is------->HAD a point on Socialism.

You see, Leftists in this country figured out that taking over business in this country would lead to the DIRECT definition that Rustic posted, so the Left devised a DIFFERENT way to control business, without actually owning it, so that people like Moonglow could with a straight face, deny, deny, deny.

And what is the way Leftists devised? It is called, REGULATION, and TAXES-)

How do you FORCE business to say...…...get rid of coal without owning the power company? REGULATE and TAX the hell out of it, so the power company has to do what you say! Same goes for HEALTHCARE!

Would ANY of these industries have done this without government intervention? Of course not; not with the feeble facts the Left gives for them doing so.

So what to do if you are Ears Obysmal, hmmmmmmmmmm. Wait, I know, just REGULATE and TAX the hell out of what you don't want, then Moonglow can smugly sit there and proclaim------------->but the government doesn't own it. True, very true, and yet, they seem to be able to FORCE business to do anything they want, now don't they!

Doubt me?

Then ask the former CEO of General Motors, who the government FORCED out, even though they didn't own their means of production, lolol. All because GM didn't see business practice the way Ears did, lol. Now you know why Ford didn't take the free money the government was offering.
Yep, Socialism is nothing more than and nothing but authoritarian. The zipper heads just want to disguise it as something Innocent. Lol
 
Millions of Americans want nothing to do with a socialist state… What part of that simple fact progressives don’t get.... lol

Democratic socialism is the most successful form of government in the wold. Americans are already living in a socialist state and the "millions of Americans" you speak of have been brainwashed by right wing talk radio and have no idea that Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are socialist programs. Americans may say they don't want a socialist state, because right wingers have vilified the term but don't try to take Obamacare away from them.
Lol
Socialism has never been a success long-term… There’s a reason why those socialist entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare and Obama care are failures.
 
Millions of Americans want nothing to do with a socialist state… What part of that simple fact progressives don’t get.... lol

Democratic socialism is the most successful form of government in the wold. Americans are already living in a socialist state and the "millions of Americans" you speak of have been brainwashed by right wing talk radio and have no idea that Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are socialist programs. Americans may say they don't want a socialist state, because right wingers have vilified the term but don't try to take Obamacare away from them.
Do you think people that haven't paid into the Social Security program should be eligible for benefits and do you think money should be taken out of Social Security for other projects? This money belongs to the people that paid into it. The problem many of us have is the bureaucrats believe this is THEIR money to do with as they wish.
 
Lol
Even if I wanted Social Security that I’ve paid in I would never see a penny of it...
 
Millions of Americans want nothing to do with a socialist state… What part of that simple fact progressives don’t get.... lol

Democratic socialism is the most successful form of government in the wold. Americans are already living in a socialist state and the "millions of Americans" you speak of have been brainwashed by right wing talk radio and have no idea that Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are socialist programs. Americans may say they don't want a socialist state, because right wingers have vilified the term but don't try to take Obamacare away from them.
Do you think people that haven't paid into the Social Security program should be eligible for benefits and do you think money should be taken out of Social Security for other projects? This money belongs to the people that paid into it. The problem many of us have is the bureaucrats believe this is THEIR money to do with as they wish.
The only way they could spend it is if it becomes an online budget item..
 
Millions of Americans want nothing to do with a socialist state… What part of that simple fact progressives don’t get.... lol

Democratic socialism is the most successful form of government in the wold. Americans are already living in a socialist state and the "millions of Americans" you speak of have been brainwashed by right wing talk radio and have no idea that Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are socialist programs. Americans may say they don't want a socialist state, because right wingers have vilified the term but don't try to take Obamacare away from them.
Do you think people that haven't paid into the Social Security program should be eligible for benefits and do you think money should be taken out of Social Security for other projects? This money belongs to the people that paid into it. The problem many of us have is the bureaucrats believe this is THEIR money to do with as they wish.
The only way they could spend it is if it becomes an online budget item..
Why are we giving Social Security benefits to people that haven't put anything into the pot?
 

Forum List

Back
Top