Pelosi and Schiff are About to Walk Into a Senate Trial Trap...Shhhh! Don't tell them!

The Senate may very well dismiss this from the onset..............Lack of evidence............quick vote and bye bye

The Swamp creatures don't want a no holds bar attack.............as the other side of the Swamp will throw others under a Greyhound bus.

The swamp is currently swirling in the Oval Office. Who's next to be thrown under the Trump Bus? "I hardly knew him...."
The Swamp is on both sides..........The best WHORE POLITICIANS money can buy................Biden is just one of many................

Why we need term limits.

That many includes Trump.
Given the long attack on Trump I'd say NO.............but even there..........Trump through business dealings in New York knows the inside info on how it works.................Buy offs to get a building permit and so on.........

These are insider Wars...............
 
If the senate rules don't allow hearsay evidence, the democrat's case boils down to what was overheard via a cell phone call in an outdoor restaurant, but he only heard the first minute or two??

Hey dummy, Sondland (they guy on the phone with Trump) fully CONFIRMED IT.
 
The Senate may very well dismiss this from the onset..............Lack of evidence............quick vote and bye bye

The Swamp creatures don't want a no holds bar attack.............as the other side of the Swamp will throw others under a Greyhound bus.

The swamp is currently swirling in the Oval Office. Who's next to be thrown under the Trump Bus? "I hardly knew him...."
The Swamp is on both sides..........The best WHORE POLITICIANS money can buy................Biden is just one of many................

Why we need term limits.

That many includes Trump.
Given the long attack on Trump I'd say NO.............but even there..........Trump through business dealings in New York knows the inside info on how it works.................Buy offs to get a building permit and so on.........

These are insider Wars...............
Trump throughout his life has been one step ahead of the sheriff and he's brought that expertise to our WH Once a crook always a crook
 
The Senate may very well dismiss this from the onset..............Lack of evidence............quick vote and bye bye

The Swamp creatures don't want a no holds bar attack.............as the other side of the Swamp will throw others under a Greyhound bus.

They'' have to talk the President out of a trial, but they probably could do that.

Only need 51 votes to dismiss and it would be bipartisan. (Manchin and Testa would vote to dismiss).

There's a lot of politics in this either way.

The Dems are probably looking for a way out of this right now. The swing states are polling 53-40 against impeachment right
now. The Dems are getting real pressure right now from not passing USMCA, and it doesn't look like that will happen this year.

They have no candidate that excites anybody right now, thus the Presidency isn't going to change. They really have to fight
to hang onto the House. At the moment, with those swing states opposed to Impeachment, they have a real problem on their
hands. Do they cave in to public opinion and then scramble to win it back over the course of a year.

The adage is..."Take your losses now." Will they do that? Probably not.
 
And yours is .....

266685_image.jpg
I guess you haven't been watching the hearings. Several firsthand witnesses have testified this week.

I asked last week what talking point you tards would come up with once the first hand witnesses testified.

I guess we know now. You would just repeat the same old horseshit about there being no firsthand witnesses.


There was no substance just emotion and speculation. Come back when you have some real evidence not emotional goo.

A pity it isn't hearsay but supported by first hand testimony.

That wasn't evidence. That was basic opinion. They have no evidence because trump broke no laws.

That remains to be seen - not that it matters because he could commit murder in broad daylight and you'd cover up for him.

In the meantime...no...not all opinion. Not by a long shot. Even the Republicans aren't defending what he DID - they're saying yes, it's bad but it's not impeachable.
people could delete 33k requested pieces of evidence and the left will cover for them.

when trump actually does this, holler. i'll go after him with you and demand he gets locked up. til then we have plenty of examples of what the left HAS IN FACT DONE that the left simply won't acknowledge as being "wrong".

we've got to get back to right/wrong being the same or we'll never bridge this ever growing divide.

you want trump impeached cause he said look into bidens activities but i've never heard you once dive into "said activities" and justify billions that went to the urkraine and back home to them.

if trump did it, again - i'd join you in locking him up. i'd demand it. i don't care he's on MY SIDE. it's illegal and wrong. so at this point i could say "obama and biden could bilk the taxpayers for billions and the left won't care" and at least i correlate what i say to actions done. not play "what if" games.
 
Last edited:
If the senate rules don't allow hearsay evidence, the democrat's case boils down to what was overheard via a cell phone call in an outdoor restaurant, but he only heard the first minute or two??

Hey dummy, Sondland (they guy on the phone with Trump) fully CONFIRMED IT.
That is NOT WHAT HE SAID AND WE HAVE THE VIDEO...YOU also going to deny what you see and hear, like you do with Bidens EXTORTION of Ukraine?

 
I think the Dems are at the peak of what they hoped this would get for them-a solid smearing attempt on Trump
I don’t think the proved or even offered anything but I think TV wise they did not look bad, So if it can likely can only stay flat or head downhill just have Pelosi declare circus is leaving town.
 
DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

Here’s why it might now be advantageous for the Republicans to hold a long, full Senate trail if the Democrats, as expected, send over articles of impeachment:

In a Senate trial, the Republicans will control the process. They will control which witnesses get called, how the hearings are conducted, what will be considered relevant to the proceedings. They will be able to compel the fake whistleblower to testify, Hunter Biden to testify, and myriad others who Adam Schiff refused to allow into his circus process. If they chose to, Republicans would even be able to call Schiff himself, along with his staff, to testify as fact witnesses about their pre-coordination with Eric Ciaramella, and how they and their Lawfare lawyers actually participated in the drafting of the complaint that kicked off this whole clown show.

A long Senate trail would disrupt the Democrat primary season. Republicans would be able to force Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar and Michael Bennet to sit in the Senate chamber, day after day, six days a week for as long as they want to keep them there, off the campaign trail. It would be a major disruption to the Democrat nomination battle, and would pretty much ensure that their nominee would either be a 77 year-old buffoon who doesn’t know what state he’s in most days or a 37 year-old neophyte who would be easy pickings next Fall.

A long Senate trial would allow the Republicans to publicly litigate the whole DNC server fraud. Maybe most damaging for the Democrats, Republicans would be able to compel testimony from Christopher Steele and witnesses from Crowdstrike and get them on the record on national television, testifying under oath about their activities during the 2016 election campaign and who paid for it all. They could even compel testimony under oath from John Podesta and Donna Brazile and Debbie Wasserman Schulz (remember, Schulz and Brazile were heads of the DNC during that time) and even Hillary Clinton if they want to. If it turned out to be politically advantageous, they could also compel testimony from James Comey and Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe and John Brennan and James Clapper and all the other Obama-era coup plotters who are now employed by MSNBC and CNN.

Remember, when this impeachment scam first started, how President Trump and Giuliani and others said that Pelosi and Schiff had walked into a trap? Well, there it is.

------------

Its lose lose for the DemonRATS... if they only vote to censure ( ... the left wing base will go nuts ... if they vote to impeach there will be the unmasking of the full corruption of the Dem party.....but who is their radical base going to vote for if they censure...the Republicans?...LOLOLOL)

I like our chances ...
 
Hell of a conspiracy theory you have going there.
And yours is .....

266685_image.jpg
I guess you haven't been watching the hearings. Several firsthand witnesses have testified this week.

I asked last week what talking point you tards would come up with once the first hand witnesses testified.

I guess we know now. You would just repeat the same old horseshit about there being no firsthand witnesses.


There was no substance just emotion and speculation. Come back when you have some real evidence not emotional goo.

A pity it isn't hearsay but supported by first hand testimony.
What don't your lying eyes and ears tell you?...Did Sondland LIE....IF HE DID LET'S LOCK HIM UP FOR LYING TO CONGRESS!!!....I repeat!

 
DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

Here’s why it might now be advantageous for the Republicans to hold a long, full Senate trail if the Democrats, as expected, send over articles of impeachment:

In a Senate trial, the Republicans will control the process. They will control which witnesses get called, how the hearings are conducted, what will be considered relevant to the proceedings. They will be able to compel the fake whistleblower to testify, Hunter Biden to testify, and myriad others who Adam Schiff refused to allow into his circus process. If they chose to, Republicans would even be able to call Schiff himself, along with his staff, to testify as fact witnesses about their pre-coordination with Eric Ciaramella, and how they and their Lawfare lawyers actually participated in the drafting of the complaint that kicked off this whole clown show.

A long Senate trail would disrupt the Democrat primary season. Republicans would be able to force Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar and Michael Bennet to sit in the Senate chamber, day after day, six days a week for as long as they want to keep them there, off the campaign trail. It would be a major disruption to the Democrat nomination battle, and would pretty much ensure that their nominee would either be a 77 year-old buffoon who doesn’t know what state he’s in most days or a 37 year-old neophyte who would be easy pickings next Fall.

A long Senate trial would allow the Republicans to publicly litigate the whole DNC server fraud. Maybe most damaging for the Democrats, Republicans would be able to compel testimony from Christopher Steele and witnesses from Crowdstrike and get them on the record on national television, testifying under oath about their activities during the 2016 election campaign and who paid for it all. They could even compel testimony under oath from John Podesta and Donna Brazile and Debbie Wasserman Schulz (remember, Schulz and Brazile were heads of the DNC during that time) and even Hillary Clinton if they want to. If it turned out to be politically advantageous, they could also compel testimony from James Comey and Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe and John Brennan and James Clapper and all the other Obama-era coup plotters who are now employed by MSNBC and CNN.

Remember, when this impeachment scam first started, how President Trump and Giuliani and others said that Pelosi and Schiff had walked into a trap? Well, there it is.

------------

Its lose lose for the DemonRATS... if they only vote to censure ( ... the left wing base will go nuts ... if they vote to impeach there will be the unmasking of the full corruption of the Dem party.....but who is their radical base going to vote for if they censure...the Republicans?...LOLOLOL)

I like our chances ...
I'm impressed with you NOTHINGBURGER ANSWER!
 
DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

Here’s why it might now be advantageous for the Republicans to hold a long, full Senate trail if the Democrats, as expected, send over articles of impeachment:

In a Senate trial, the Republicans will control the process. They will control which witnesses get called, how the hearings are conducted, what will be considered relevant to the proceedings. They will be able to compel the fake whistleblower to testify, Hunter Biden to testify, and myriad others who Adam Schiff refused to allow into his circus process. If they chose to, Republicans would even be able to call Schiff himself, along with his staff, to testify as fact witnesses about their pre-coordination with Eric Ciaramella, and how they and their Lawfare lawyers actually participated in the drafting of the complaint that kicked off this whole clown show.

A long Senate trail would disrupt the Democrat primary season. Republicans would be able to force Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar and Michael Bennet to sit in the Senate chamber, day after day, six days a week for as long as they want to keep them there, off the campaign trail. It would be a major disruption to the Democrat nomination battle, and would pretty much ensure that their nominee would either be a 77 year-old buffoon who doesn’t know what state he’s in most days or a 37 year-old neophyte who would be easy pickings next Fall.

A long Senate trial would allow the Republicans to publicly litigate the whole DNC server fraud. Maybe most damaging for the Democrats, Republicans would be able to compel testimony from Christopher Steele and witnesses from Crowdstrike and get them on the record on national television, testifying under oath about their activities during the 2016 election campaign and who paid for it all. They could even compel testimony under oath from John Podesta and Donna Brazile and Debbie Wasserman Schulz (remember, Schulz and Brazile were heads of the DNC during that time) and even Hillary Clinton if they want to. If it turned out to be politically advantageous, they could also compel testimony from James Comey and Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe and John Brennan and James Clapper and all the other Obama-era coup plotters who are now employed by MSNBC and CNN.

Remember, when this impeachment scam first started, how President Trump and Giuliani and others said that Pelosi and Schiff had walked into a trap? Well, there it is.

------------

Its lose lose for the DemonRATS... if they only vote to censure ( ... the left wing base will go nuts ... if they vote to impeach there will be the unmasking of the full corruption of the Dem party.....but who is their radical base going to vote for if they censure...the Republicans?...LOLOLOL)

I like our chances ...
Or.... If they want, they can subpoena them into a secret one sided partisan hearings in a SCIF and selectively leak the parts that fit their narrative.

But Republicans never stoop as low as Democrats.
 
Trump.
Most Corrupt.


That's it.
Always been a Con Man.
Wow.

That's a thoughtful retort.

I'm thankful you agree.
Trump is a LIAR.
Trump is a FRAUD.

I think these two statements define our POTUS.
How any civil minded American can support this LIAR and FRAUD amazes me.
It sadly does.
And we feel the same about you...a liarvand a frsud plus a mind manipulated dronevof the communist/ demonRATS....Amazing that you can breathe and type at the same time!
 
I'm thankful you agree.
Trump is a LIAR.
Trump is a FRAUD.

I think these two statements define our POTUS.
How any civil minded American can support this LIAR and FRAUD amazes me.
It sadly does.
To be fair, the only people that support Trunp are those that support historically record high American employment, multi-decade high wage growth, destruction of the terrorist Caliphate, and increase in manufacturing jobs.

None of the America-hater Socialist, CPUSA or Progs support Trump at all.
 
DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

Here’s why it might now be advantageous for the Republicans to hold a long, full Senate trail if the Democrats, as expected, send over articles of impeachment:

In a Senate trial, the Republicans will control the process. They will control which witnesses get called, how the hearings are conducted, what will be considered relevant to the proceedings. They will be able to compel the fake whistleblower to testify, Hunter Biden to testify, and myriad others who Adam Schiff refused to allow into his circus process. If they chose to, Republicans would even be able to call Schiff himself, along with his staff, to testify as fact witnesses about their pre-coordination with Eric Ciaramella, and how they and their Lawfare lawyers actually participated in the drafting of the complaint that kicked off this whole clown show.

A long Senate trail would disrupt the Democrat primary season. Republicans would be able to force Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar and Michael Bennet to sit in the Senate chamber, day after day, six days a week for as long as they want to keep them there, off the campaign trail. It would be a major disruption to the Democrat nomination battle, and would pretty much ensure that their nominee would either be a 77 year-old buffoon who doesn’t know what state he’s in most days or a 37 year-old neophyte who would be easy pickings next Fall.

A long Senate trial would allow the Republicans to publicly litigate the whole DNC server fraud. Maybe most damaging for the Democrats, Republicans would be able to compel testimony from Christopher Steele and witnesses from Crowdstrike and get them on the record on national television, testifying under oath about their activities during the 2016 election campaign and who paid for it all. They could even compel testimony under oath from John Podesta and Donna Brazile and Debbie Wasserman Schulz (remember, Schulz and Brazile were heads of the DNC during that time) and even Hillary Clinton if they want to. If it turned out to be politically advantageous, they could also compel testimony from James Comey and Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe and John Brennan and James Clapper and all the other Obama-era coup plotters who are now employed by MSNBC and CNN.

Remember, when this impeachment scam first started, how President Trump and Giuliani and others said that Pelosi and Schiff had walked into a trap? Well, there it is.

------------

Its lose lose for the DemonRATS... if they only vote to censure ( ... the left wing base will go nuts ... if they vote to impeach there will be the unmasking of the full corruption of the Dem party.....but who is their radical base going to vote for if they censure...the Republicans?...LOLOLOL)

I like our chances ...

You are a idiot. The Republicans do not completely control the process. The chief justice will preside and Democrats can object to the relevancy. It would also make Republicans look bad Every crazy conspiracy theory on display. The whistleblower is protected by federal law.
 
I'm thankful you agree.
Trump is a LIAR.
Trump is a FRAUD.

I think these two statements define our POTUS.
How any civil minded American can support this LIAR and FRAUD amazes me.
It sadly does.
To be fair, the only people that support Trunp are those that support historically record high American employment, multi-decade high wage growth, destruction of the terrorist Caliphate, and increase in manufacturing jobs.

None of the America-hater Socialist, CPUSA or Progs support Trump at all.

The unemployment rate started dropping under Obama. Wage growth is not the highest in decades. ISIS is not gone and Trump is making the same mistake that Obama did. Manufacturing is in recession thanks to Trump's tariffs.
 
A pity it isn't hearsay but supported by first hand testimony.

That wasn't evidence. That was basic opinion. They have no evidence because trump broke no laws.

That remains to be seen - not that it matters because he could commit murder in broad daylight and you'd cover up for him.

In the meantime...no...not all opinion. Not by a long shot. Even the Republicans aren't defending what he DID - they're saying yes, it's bad but it's not impeachable.
Only if he killed a progressive lying bitch....sound familiar?.....and WHAT DID YOUR TALKING POINTS LIE ABOUT ...HE HELD UP AID THAT iTHE SURRENDER MONKEY NEVER SENT EVEN WHEN THE RUSSIANS ATTACKED UKRAINE....THAT
AID?.... It really makes me wonder just how mentally Ill the left in this country is!!!

Not sure what exactly you are going on about here but delusional comes to mind.

What congressionally approved aid was never sent? The stuff Trump held up in an effort to extort Ukraine?

No, he didn't extort Ukraine and there is no proof. Delusional is a dem Congress calling people to testify about how they felt about what transpired. Delusional is a lib Congress MO from day one once trump was elected to "impeach that mother******.

There is plenty of proof. Mulvaney even admitted it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top