32% would be low for payday loans. aprs are realistically 200% or far more.
Over 300% and as high as 1900%.
.
The problem with applying APR as a measure is that most payday loans are for far short of a year. $20 for a $100 loan paid back in a month is 792% APR But is $20 on $100 actually unreasonable? I wouldn't think anything less would be worth the trouble of lending, especially considering the high risk.
I would argue that for those who do not rely on pay day loans, but only use them rarely, then they're not actually a bad thing and can help people out. But hidden fees, deceptive conditions, and people who repeatedly use the services do make them problematical.
i don't disagree with this. when missouri first started allowing riverboat gambling a law capped a person's losses at $500 for i believe 3 hours. eventually the casino lobby had the law overturned, but the idea was to keep people from getting too far over their heads too quickly.
i believe that the same sort of practice should be put into place with payday loans. it may require a database of short term loans in the state, but capping the number of loans a person can have, or how many times they can refinance, would in my opinion be of benefit to society.