geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
☭proletarian☭;1836650 said:Well, that rules you out, then, gth
No shit.
I am not the one standing here acting like a fucking martyr.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
☭proletarian☭;1836650 said:Well, that rules you out, then, gth
Pro, I believe he was making a point. The questions all have only ONE CORRECT answer. The ones that answer them in FALSE, tend to be the ones who don't accept facts into their line of reasoning.☭proletarian☭;1836710 said:Is Obama a legal citizen?
is Obama a Muslim?
Does the the health care bill have deathpanels in it?
Did we Find WMD s in Iraq?
Did the Iraq war keep Americans safe?
Is global warming real?
Did Barney Franks cause the economic downfall?
Did the GBL act help the US?
There are facts that the right just flat out refusses to accept.
Those aren't facts, you idiot. They're (really stupid) questions.
Now get the fuck out of my thread, you moronic partisan twit.
☭proletarian☭;1836710 said:Is Obama a legal citizen?
is Obama a Muslim?
Does the the health care bill have deathpanels in it?
Did we Find WMD s in Iraq?
Did the Iraq war keep Americans safe?
Is global warming real?
Did Barney Franks cause the economic downfall?
Did the GBL act help the US?
There are facts that the right just flat out refusses to accept.
Those aren't facts, you idiot. They're (really stupid) questions.
Now get the fuck out of my thread, you moronic partisan twit.
Interesting thread, I had a thread once called " Team Mentality" where I discussed something like this. In short the issue here and is on display in Washington on a daily basis is a team mentality that people will cast aside even their own belief structure in order to appear supportive of the team. I had an interesting debate on this issue as well, when I happened to mention that the term United States Senator from (fill in state name) does noe indicate anywhere what party that person belongs too and the same can be said for House members. Having said that, you notice the only place you ever see (R) or (D) or anything that might show what team they happen to belong to is more or less not a matter of constitutional value but is an institutional one. So all this animosity that and talk about what your party is and what my party is only means something if we the actual employers of those that represent us let it. That is the problem we face, when those we elect ignore the people that elect them for whatever reason, and then people blindly follow them. While not picking on the Democrats, let me cite you just one small example from both parties, on the Democrats side their own party plank called for a Public Option in a healthcare plan , we all saw how fast that got tossed aside in the name of the "Team". On the other side, for years my party had represented itself as the small Govt. party , one in which we expressed a desire that Govt. should only perform those tasks outlined in the consitution and be fiscially responsible. We all have seen the results of that policy on both sides of the Isle. In my opinion people generally desire the same things in life, happiness, safety, wealth, etc, so really the only things we generally disagree on is how to get there. If that is the case, then in doing so, sometimes it may take just more than one idea to achieve those.
good post, but a slight flaw in your smaller govt aspect. You guys (as in republicans) did elect Bush twice.
Thus the reason why, I meantioned the small Govt. issue in the first place, and your correct President Bush was elected to office twice as was President Clinton.
☭proletarian☭;1836430 said:What does the whole
thing achieve? Seriously, I see no shortage of partisan bickering, but there's a serious dearth of meaningful discussion about the policies themselves or underlying principles. Does the phrase 'useful idiots' mean anything to you?'fuck you leftist liberal democrat'
NO, fuck YOU, republican neocon
MarcATL (sig) said:
So you admit you're the problem?There is never going to be anything but partisanship as long as some people insist on NOT accpeting facts that prove their ideas are flawed.
There is never going to be anything but partisanship as long as some people insist on NOT accpeting facts that prove their ideas are flawed.
☭proletarian☭;1836430 said:What does the whole
'fuck you leftist liberal democrat'
NO, fuck YOU, republican neocon
thing achieve? Seriously, I see no shortage of partisan bickering, but there's a serious dearth of meaningful discussion about the policies themselves or underlying principles. Does the phrase 'useful idiots' mean anything to you?
good post, but a slight flaw in your smaller govt aspect. You guys (as in republicans) did elect Bush twice.
Thus the reason why, I meantioned the small Govt. issue in the first place, and your correct President Bush was elected to office twice as was President Clinton.
Clinton had a better record on smaller govt than Bush did. So I am not sure why you threw him in that.
He seems to be.Is Obama a legal citizen?....
I don't care..... is Obama a Muslim? ....
I don't know what a 'deathpanel' is, but there is much in the bill about which one should be deeply concerned..... Does the the health care bill have deathpanels in it? ....
Yes..... Did we Find WMD s in Iraq? ....
Hard to say definitively. Did you feel unsafe?.... Did the Iraq war keep Americans safe? ....
Relatively, sure. Is AGW real? The state of the science doesn't allow for a definitive conclusion one way or the other..... Is global warming real? ....
Partly, yes..... Did Barney Franks cause the economic downfall? ....
GLB act, you mean? I can't say for sure..... Did the GBL act help the US? ....
They looked more like questions to me, but if you mean the questions have definitive answers in your mind, then I guess they would seem like facts..... There are facts that the right just flat out refusses to accept.
- Is Obama a legal citizen?
- is Obama a Muslim?
- Does the the health care bill have deathpanels in it?
- Did we Find WMD s in Iraq?
- Did the Iraq war keep Americans safe?
- Is global warming real?
- Did Barney Franks cause the economic downfall?
- Did the GBL act help the US?
There are facts that the right just flat out refusses to accept.
Thus the reason why, I meantioned the small Govt. issue in the first place, and your correct President Bush was elected to office twice as was President Clinton.
Clinton had a better record on smaller govt than Bush did. So I am not sure why you threw him in that.
He did actually, I threw him in there to indicate that he was elected twice as was Bush. However, let me say this, both Presidents share one thing in common, and that is that they are not islands and their accomplishments or failures were the results of the actions of many people both Republican and Democrat.
☭proletarian☭;1836430 said:What does the whole
'fuck you leftist liberal democrat'
NO, fuck YOU, republican neocon
thing achieve? Seriously, I see no shortage of partisan bickering, but there's a serious dearth of meaningful discussion about the policies themselves or underlying principles. Does the phrase 'useful idiots' mean anything to you?
Since the election the Republicans on this board have received the following messages.
You are white, you don't count
You are old you don't count
Republicans are white southern racists.
We don't need you
Sit down and let the grownups take over
Sit down and shut the fuck up
We won the election.
Elections have consequences.
Why should we listen to you
We blame boooooooooooooooosh
Now,, what part of that should encourage us to work with Democrats? Pray tell.
☭proletarian☭;1836772 said:So you admit you're the problem?There is never going to be anything but partisanship as long as some people insist on NOT accpeting facts that prove their ideas are flawed.
☭proletarian☭;1836430 said:What does the whole
'fuck you leftist liberal democrat'
thing achieve? Seriously, I see no shortage of partisan bickering, but there's a serious dearth of meaningful discussion about the policies themselves or underlying principles. Does the phrase 'useful idiots' mean anything to you?
Since the election the Republicans on this board have received the following messages.
You are white, you don't count
You are old you don't count
Republicans are white southern racists.
We don't need you
Sit down and let the grownups take over
Sit down and shut the fuck up
We won the election.
Elections have consequences.
Why should we listen to you
We blame boooooooooooooooosh
Now,, what part of that should encourage us to work with Democrats? Pray tell.