DiamondDave
Army Vet
The cost of some of those treatments comes in the shape of a more painful and drawn out death for some. When quality of life is severely compromised you are no longer talking about prolonging life but about prolonging and increasing the agony of death.I think I see your problem asshat. You are too stupid to tell the difference between some news articale you read and the actual LEGISLATION. What a moron.
Once again you dumb as a rock retard, the provision was put in, in the hopes of getting elderly and terminal patients OFF expensive end of life treatments. The ENTIRE point of the councilling is to convince them to just die in bed or a hospice and NOT seek treatments that might prolong their lives but cost a lot. The one that can not comprehend facts is you.
And if I wish to live in total agony 10 days longer to have those 10 days to say things to my kids, or to see their faces.. it is my freedom and choice on whether I do it... and I certainly do not want some government bureaucrat trying to convince me to end it sooner for the budgetary aspect or for the 'state'