Palin owns Women's Rights

[Lumpy 1]

With no popular leftist women possessing any charisma whatever, it's inevitable that Palin, the reigning Queen of Charisma, will become the voice of Women's Rights in the near future. The leftist fear will be realized and their shrill voices will be just a whored memories.

This article was interesting...........

Hard on the heels of Sarah Palin’s stellar speech (and we assure the readers that our juxtaposition of the words words “Hard on”, “heels”, and “Sarah Palin” is purely coincidental) at yesterday’s D.C. rally, Feministas Anna Holmes and Rebecca Traister have published an Op-ed in today’s New York Times bemoaning the left’s lack of a similar charismatic female leader. It is a stunning admission of political failure, or it would be if they were talking about anything other than Feminism, which hasn’t chalked up a single genuine victory since the 70′s.

Palin is a political Dreadnought – she’s withstood two years of constant assault from the left and yet refuses to sink. Libs have thrown their entire arsenal at her but she continues on, even picking up speed. She’s now on the verge of appropriating one of their most cherished issues – Women’s Rights – and it’s driving them crazy.

Liberals Now Want Their Own Sarah Palin? | ConstitutionClub.org

 

[Luissa]

God help women!

A woman who rolls her eyes at a another woman for saying she is a teacher, does not represent women's rights. And they don't have reality tv shows.

 

[uscitizen]

Support womens rights to tanning beds

 

[NYcarbineer]

AP-Gfk polls August 16th

Favorable view of Palin - 41%

Favorable view of Hillary Clinton - 65%

...and...

CBSnews poll August 20th

Favorable view of Palin - 23%

 

[Lumpy 1]

AP-Gfk polls August 16th

Favorable view of Palin - 41%

Favorable view of Hillary Clinton - 65%

...and...

CBSnews poll August 20th

Favorable view of Palin - 23%

Congress Approval Rating at lowest since the 70s at 11%

http://politisite.com/2010/07/22/congress-approval-rating-at-lowest-since-the-70s-at-11/

If you trust polls.. sheez .. you must be worried...

 

[PoliticalChic]

With no popular leftist women possessing any charisma whatever, it's inevitable that Palin, the reigning Queen of Charisma, will become the voice of Women's Rights in the near future. The leftist fear will be realized and their shrill voices will be just a whored memories.

This article was interesting...........

Hard on the heels of Sarah Palin’s stellar speech (and we assure the readers that our juxtaposition of the words words “Hard on”, “heels”, and “Sarah Palin” is purely coincidental) at yesterday’s D.C. rally, Feministas Anna Holmes and Rebecca Traister have published an Op-ed in today’s New York Times bemoaning the left’s lack of a similar charismatic female leader. It is a stunning admission of political failure, or it would be if they were talking about anything other than Feminism, which hasn’t chalked up a single genuine victory since the 70′s.

Palin is a political Dreadnought – she’s withstood two years of constant assault from the left and yet refuses to sink. Libs have thrown their entire arsenal at her but she continues on, even picking up speed. She’s now on the verge of appropriating one of their most cherished issues – Women’s Rights – and it’s driving them crazy.

Liberals Now Want Their Own Sarah Palin? | ConstitutionClub.org

Sorry, friend Lumpy, but the possibilty of Governor Palin being acceptable to those self-identified as 'feminists' is unsalable.

1. Feminism in the commonly accepted cultural parlance is far left wing, and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party.

2. Radical Feminists refuse to recognize the accomplishments of conservative women. Jeane Kirkpatrick, Margaret Thatcher, Sarah Palin, none could be recognized or honored. Apparently there are men, women, and people who might otherwise have qualified as women but have chosen to be Republicans instead.

3. To be acceptable, Palin whole have to redesigned...The result must of course be anti-bourgeois, anti-capitalist, anti-family, anti- religion, and anti-intellectual.

4. Logical as it seems that women should be prepared for events such as divorce and widowhood, marriage and family may reduce opportunities for outside work or education. But the solution, according to Simone de Beauvoir in an interview with Betty Friedan is “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p. 18.

a. Like all totalitarian movements, the goal is not to give more freedom, but to take away choice. This view, of course, would be anthema to Governor Palin's conservativism.

 

[uscitizen]

AP-Gfk polls August 16th

Favorable view of Palin - 41%

Favorable view of Hillary Clinton - 65%

...and...

CBSnews poll August 20th

Favorable view of Palin - 23%

Congress Approval Rating at lowest since the 70s at 11%

http://politisite.com/2010/07/22/congress-approval-rating-at-lowest-since-the-70s-at-11/

If you trust polls.. sheez .. you must be worried...

Yeah that poll has to be hosed. Congress's approval could not be as high as 11%

 

[Lumpy 1]

With no popular leftist women possessing any charisma whatever, it's inevitable that Palin, the reigning Queen of Charisma, will become the voice of Women's Rights in the near future. The leftist fear will be realized and their shrill voices will be just a whored memories.

This article was interesting...........

Hard on the heels of Sarah Palin’s stellar speech (and we assure the readers that our juxtaposition of the words words “Hard on”, “heels”, and “Sarah Palin” is purely coincidental) at yesterday’s D.C. rally, Feministas Anna Holmes and Rebecca Traister have published an Op-ed in today’s New York Times bemoaning the left’s lack of a similar charismatic female leader. It is a stunning admission of political failure, or it would be if they were talking about anything other than Feminism, which hasn’t chalked up a single genuine victory since the 70′s.

Palin is a political Dreadnought – she’s withstood two years of constant assault from the left and yet refuses to sink. Libs have thrown their entire arsenal at her but she continues on, even picking up speed. She’s now on the verge of appropriating one of their most cherished issues – Women’s Rights – and it’s driving them crazy.

Liberals Now Want Their Own Sarah Palin? | ConstitutionClub.org

Sorry, friend Lumpy, but the possibilty of Governor Palin being acceptable to those self-identified as 'feminists' is unsalable.

1. Feminism in the commonly accepted cultural parlance is far left wing, and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party.

2. Radical Feminists refuse to recognize the accomplishments of conservative women. Jeane Kirkpatrick, Margaret Thatcher, Sarah Palin, none could be recognized or honored. Apparently there are men, women, and people who might otherwise have qualified as women but have chosen to be Republicans instead.

3. To be acceptable, Palin whole have to redesigned...The result must of course be anti-bourgeois, anti-capitalist, anti-family, anti- religion, and anti-intellectual.

4. Logical as it seems that women should be prepared for events such as divorce and widowhood, marriage and family may reduce opportunities for outside work or education. But the solution, according to Simone de Beauvoir in an interview with Betty Friedan is “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p. 18.

a. Like all totalitarian movements, the goal is not to give more freedom, but to take away choice. This view, of course, would be anthema to Governor Palin's conservativism.

Brilliant post........... I'm repping

 

[Big Black Dog]

Sarah Palin continues to build strength - just like a tropical storm that is one day going to be much larger in scale. I agree. She is much like the old Timex watch commercial. "Takes a licking and keeps on ticking." She has a message that is like a breath of fresh air to many and like the sound of fingernails on a chalkboard to others BUT you have to agree that everybody listens to Sarah Palin. Some to scorn and others to give her words some real thought. I predict that one day we will all be hearing more from Sarah Palin. One day, women are going to truly rally around her and you know the saying, "The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world."

 

[Lumpy 1]

AP-Gfk polls August 16th

Favorable view of Palin - 41%

Favorable view of Hillary Clinton - 65%

...and...

CBSnews poll August 20th

Favorable view of Palin - 23%

Congress Approval Rating at lowest since the 70s at 11%

http://politisite.com/2010/07/22/congress-approval-rating-at-lowest-since-the-70s-at-11/

If you trust polls.. sheez .. you must be worried...

Yeah that poll has to be hosed. Congress's approval could not be as high as 11%

If it makes you feel better this poll was 7/22/10, I'm almost certain Congressional approval is even worse now..

 

[NYcarbineer]

AP-Gfk polls August 16th

Favorable view of Palin - 41%

Favorable view of Hillary Clinton - 65%

...and...

CBSnews poll August 20th

Favorable view of Palin - 23%

Congress Approval Rating at lowest since the 70s at 11%

http://politisite.com/2010/07/22/congress-approval-rating-at-lowest-since-the-70s-at-11/

If you trust polls.. sheez .. you must be worried...

Wow, you lowered the bar pretty quick there. We went from Palin owns women's rights to Palin is slightly less repugnant than Congress.

lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

[2. Radical Feminists refuse to recognize the accomplishments of conservative women. Jeane Kirkpatrick, Margaret Thatcher, Sarah Palin, none could be recognized or honored. Apparently there are men, women, and people who might otherwise have qualified as women but have chosen to be Republicans instead.

What are Palin's accomplishments, exactly?

 

[jillian]

God help women!

A woman who rolls her eyes at a another woman for saying she is a teacher, does not represent women's rights. And they don't have reality tv shows.

no woman who thinks the state should force someone to carry a child that results from rape or incest should be put in the same sentence as 'woman's rights'.


how many rightwing palin threads is this for this week?

 

[Luissa]

With no popular leftist women possessing any charisma whatever, it's inevitable that Palin, the reigning Queen of Charisma, will become the voice of Women's Rights in the near future. The leftist fear will be realized and their shrill voices will be just a whored memories.

This article was interesting...........

Hard on the heels of Sarah Palin’s stellar speech (and we assure the readers that our juxtaposition of the words words “Hard on”, “heels”, and “Sarah Palin” is purely coincidental) at yesterday’s D.C. rally, Feministas Anna Holmes and Rebecca Traister have published an Op-ed in today’s New York Times bemoaning the left’s lack of a similar charismatic female leader. It is a stunning admission of political failure, or it would be if they were talking about anything other than Feminism, which hasn’t chalked up a single genuine victory since the 70′s.

Palin is a political Dreadnought – she’s withstood two years of constant assault from the left and yet refuses to sink. Libs have thrown their entire arsenal at her but she continues on, even picking up speed. She’s now on the verge of appropriating one of their most cherished issues – Women’s Rights – and it’s driving them crazy.

Liberals Now Want Their Own Sarah Palin? | ConstitutionClub.org

Sorry, friend Lumpy, but the possibilty of Governor Palin being acceptable to those self-identified as 'feminists' is unsalable.

1. Feminism in the commonly accepted cultural parlance is far left wing, and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party.

2. Radical Feminists refuse to recognize the accomplishments of conservative women. Jeane Kirkpatrick, Margaret Thatcher, Sarah Palin, none could be recognized or honored. Apparently there are men, women, and people who might otherwise have qualified as women but have chosen to be Republicans instead.

3. To be acceptable, Palin whole have to redesigned...The result must of course be anti-bourgeois, anti-capitalist, anti-family, anti- religion, and anti-intellectual.

4. Logical as it seems that women should be prepared for events such as divorce and widowhood, marriage and family may reduce opportunities for outside work or education. But the solution, according to Simone de Beauvoir in an interview with Betty Friedan is “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p. 18.

a. Like all totalitarian movements, the goal is not to give more freedom, but to take away choice. This view, of course, would be anthema to Governor Palin's conservativism.

I think she already has the anti intellectual part down.
And many women like our leader to fight for ALL of our rights, not the ones they feel are moral or right. And I think it is funny you speak about totalitarianism, especially someone who likes McCarthy so much. Palin isn't about freedom either, she is about one religion, one point of view, and telling someone who they can marry and what they can do with their body.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What kind of charisma is it that prevents 3 out of 4 people from viewing you favorably?

Is that bizzaro charisma?

 

[Luissa]

Congress Approval Rating at lowest since the 70s at 11%

http://politisite.com/2010/07/22/congress-approval-rating-at-lowest-since-the-70s-at-11/

If you trust polls.. sheez .. you must be worried...

Yeah that poll has to be hosed. Congress's approval could not be as high as 11%

If it makes you feel better this poll was 7/22/10, I'm almost certain Congressional approval is even worse now..

So? He proved that people favor Hilary Clinton over Palin. We didn't need to know about Congress.

 

[goldcatt]

Like there ever could or should be one single voice for Womens' Rights.

There is no one "Womens' Movement". There is no one vision of what "Womens' Rights" should look like, or what our role should be, or what exactly constitutes "feminism". What on Earth makes anybody think that just because we all have ovaries all women will agree on one set definition and follow one woman as a standard bearer? Or that any standard bearer should even be a politician?

Sorry Lumpy, but what a silly article. Women aren't sheep.

 

[Granny]

With no popular leftist women possessing any charisma whatever, it's inevitable that Palin, the reigning Queen of Charisma, will become the voice of Women's Rights in the near future. The leftist fear will be realized and their shrill voices will be just a whored memories.

This article was interesting...........

Hard on the heels of Sarah Palin’s stellar speech (and we assure the readers that our juxtaposition of the words words “Hard on”, “heels”, and “Sarah Palin” is purely coincidental) at yesterday’s D.C. rally, Feministas Anna Holmes and Rebecca Traister have published an Op-ed in today’s New York Times bemoaning the left’s lack of a similar charismatic female leader. It is a stunning admission of political failure, or it would be if they were talking about anything other than Feminism, which hasn’t chalked up a single genuine victory since the 70′s.

Palin is a political Dreadnought – she’s withstood two years of constant assault from the left and yet refuses to sink. Libs have thrown their entire arsenal at her but she continues on, even picking up speed. She’s now on the verge of appropriating one of their most cherished issues – Women’s Rights – and it’s driving them crazy.

Liberals Now Want Their Own Sarah Palin? | ConstitutionClub.org

Sorry, friend Lumpy, but the possibilty of Governor Palin being acceptable to those self-identified as 'feminists' is unsalable.

1. Feminism in the commonly accepted cultural parlance is far left wing, and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party.

2. Radical Feminists refuse to recognize the accomplishments of conservative women. Jeane Kirkpatrick, Margaret Thatcher, Sarah Palin, none could be recognized or honored. Apparently there are men, women, and people who might otherwise have qualified as women but have chosen to be Republicans instead.

3. To be acceptable, Palin whole have to redesigned...The result must of course be anti-bourgeois, anti-capitalist, anti-family, anti- religion, and anti-intellectual.

4. Logical as it seems that women should be prepared for events such as divorce and widowhood, marriage and family may reduce opportunities for outside work or education. But the solution, according to Simone de Beauvoir in an interview with Betty Friedan is “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p. 18.

a. Like all totalitarian movements, the goal is not to give more freedom, but to take away choice. This view, of course, would be anthema to Governor Palin's conservativism.

You're exactly right. It's too bad so many women still don't see this movement for exactly what it is.

 

[Luissa]

With no popular leftist women possessing any charisma whatever, it's inevitable that Palin, the reigning Queen of Charisma, will become the voice of Women's Rights in the near future. The leftist fear will be realized and their shrill voices will be just a whored memories.

This article was interesting...........

Hard on the heels of Sarah Palin’s stellar speech (and we assure the readers that our juxtaposition of the words words “Hard on”, “heels”, and “Sarah Palin” is purely coincidental) at yesterday’s D.C. rally, Feministas Anna Holmes and Rebecca Traister have published an Op-ed in today’s New York Times bemoaning the left’s lack of a similar charismatic female leader. It is a stunning admission of political failure, or it would be if they were talking about anything other than Feminism, which hasn’t chalked up a single genuine victory since the 70′s.

Palin is a political Dreadnought – she’s withstood two years of constant assault from the left and yet refuses to sink. Libs have thrown their entire arsenal at her but she continues on, even picking up speed. She’s now on the verge of appropriating one of their most cherished issues – Women’s Rights – and it’s driving them crazy.

Liberals Now Want Their Own Sarah Palin? | ConstitutionClub.org

Sorry, friend Lumpy, but the possibilty of Governor Palin being acceptable to those self-identified as 'feminists' is unsalable.

1. Feminism in the commonly accepted cultural parlance is far left wing, and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party.

2. Radical Feminists refuse to recognize the accomplishments of conservative women. Jeane Kirkpatrick, Margaret Thatcher, Sarah Palin, none could be recognized or honored. Apparently there are men, women, and people who might otherwise have qualified as women but have chosen to be Republicans instead.

3. To be acceptable, Palin whole have to redesigned...The result must of course be anti-bourgeois, anti-capitalist, anti-family, anti- religion, and anti-intellectual.

4. Logical as it seems that women should be prepared for events such as divorce and widowhood, marriage and family may reduce opportunities for outside work or education. But the solution, according to Simone de Beauvoir in an interview with Betty Friedan is “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p. 18.

a. Like all totalitarian movements, the goal is not to give more freedom, but to take away choice. This view, of course, would be anthema to Governor Palin's conservativism.

You're exactly right. It's too bad so many women still don't see this movement for exactly what it is.

And exactly what is it? Us fighting for our rights? or us leaving the kitchen?

 

[Lumpy 1]

Like there ever could or should be one single voice for Womens' Rights.

There is no one "Womens' Movement". There is no one vision of what "Womens' Rights" should look like, or what our role should be, or what exactly constitutes "feminism". What on Earth makes anybody think that just because we all have ovaries all women will agree on one set definition and follow one woman as a standard bearer? Or that any standard bearer should even be a politician?

Sorry Lumpy, but what a silly article. Women aren't sheep.

I think Political Chic pretty well rested the case...

As far as women being sheep.. I don't recall making that kind of comment.. interesting that you should bring that up though..