Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Deflection.You are so full of shit. Israel occupied the territory of unarmed civilians and built illegal settlements. And that was after the UN resolved that those civilians return home.RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
This is a very debatable position to hold.
(COMMENT)Najd was occupied by the Negev Brigade as part of Operation Barak, and the villagers were expelled and fled to Gaza.
Well the first question:
◈ Who was expelled?
◈ Who fled the scene?
The second quest revolves around the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL).
IF you can't move the battle (military objective), THEN move the people (civilians and civilian objects).
(COMMENT)Following the war the area was incorporated into the State of Israel and the city of Sderot was founded in 1951 on village land, a few miles to the south of the village site,[16] while Or HaNer was founded in 1957 also on village land, to the northeast.[16]
Najd, Gaza - Wikipedia
We know when Israel occupied that territory, but how did Israel legally acquire that land?
Well, part of the logic has to do with the fact that there was no Arab Palestinian sovereignty to lay a political claim to the territory in question. AND no Arab Palestinian organization (no informal political subdivisions • otherwise) even considered opening a set of negotiation.
Israel did not occupy any sovereign Arab Palestinian Territory. Nor did Israel incorporate any sovereign territory of the Arab Palestinian. The question becomes:Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate
the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of
solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems
concerning frontiers of States.
IF the Arab Palestinian had no functional government or position from
which to argue their soverenty was injured, THEN who should make the
claim of a political injury?
........View attachment 276174
Most Respectfully,
R
Israel occupied the territory of unarmed civilians and built illegal settlements.
Unarmed civilians had their own country? Cool!!!
What was it called?
Mostly English with a little Arabic.RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
This is a very debatable position to hold.
(COMMENT)Najd was occupied by the Negev Brigade as part of Operation Barak, and the villagers were expelled and fled to Gaza.
Well the first question:
◈ Who was expelled?
◈ Who fled the scene?
The second quest revolves around the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL).
IF you can't move the battle (military objective), THEN move the people (civilians and civilian objects).
(COMMENT)Following the war the area was incorporated into the State of Israel and the city of Sderot was founded in 1951 on village land, a few miles to the south of the village site,[16] while Or HaNer was founded in 1957 also on village land, to the northeast.[16]
Najd, Gaza - Wikipedia
We know when Israel occupied that territory, but how did Israel legally acquire that land?
Well, part of the logic has to do with the fact that there was no Arab Palestinian sovereignty to lay a political claim to the territory in question. AND no Arab Palestinian organization (no informal political subdivisions • otherwise) even considered opening a set of negotiation.
Israel did not occupy any sovereign Arab Palestinian Territory. Nor did Israel incorporate any sovereign territory of the Arab Palestinian. The question becomes:Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate
the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of
solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems
concerning frontiers of States.
IF the Arab Palestinian had no functional government or position from
which to argue their soverenty was injured, THEN who should make the
claim of a political injury?
........View attachment 276174
Most Respectfully,
R
Recognizing
that the Palestinian people is entitled to self-determination in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,
Expressing its grave concern that the Palestinian people has been prevented from enjoying its inalienable rights, in particular its right to self-determination,
Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter,
Recalling its relevant resolutions which affirm the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination,
1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:
(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;
(b) The right to national independence and sovereignty;
2. Reaffirms also the inalienable right of the Palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return;
UN General Assembly Resolution 3236 and UN General Assembly Resolution 3237
Palestine exists. The Palestinians exist. The Palestinians have universal inalienable rights.
Sure, whenever Jews go to Palestine, they bring Israel with them.Good question. Most people do not come here to discuss issues. They are here to sling poo and call names. If they cannot yell terrorist or anti Semite, they have nothing to say.Why is this thread full of pictures and videos without discussion?
Is this a special section?
I did. Comment on my post just above yours .
Still didn’t address Abbas admitting the “ two State Solution “ isn’t is goal
Or why you object to Jews not selling land to Palestinians but no objection to Palestinians eligible for the death penalty if they do the same
Or why they formally declared Jews are not entitled to the Western WallLike that is ever going to happen.Or why you object to Jews not selling land to Palestinians
(COMMENT)SJP’s Win Is a Victory for All of Us
University administrators across the nation should look at the wording of the decision and take warning: capricious and unjustified selective enforcement of standards that other groups are not held to does not stand up in court. Such actions are no better than politically motivated censorship and will be judged as such. Pro-Palestinian activists should take heart and use this decision as precedent in defense of their own advocacy against the next stonewalling of their efforts.
SJP’s Win Is a Victory for All of Us - The Observer
Huh!RE: Palestine Today (US Domestic Activities)
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Universities are no strangers to student counter-cultures undertakings and protest activities. It is a fact of life that officials have always lived with the threat of violence and the disruptions of normalized activities in the proximity of such gathering. Various university administrations have had to grapple with these movements that emerged of the last half of the 20th Century and spilling over into the 21st Century. As my father had said many times, "we will deal with it."
(COMMENT)SJP’s Win Is a Victory for All of Us
University administrators across the nation should look at the wording of the decision and take warning: capricious and unjustified selective enforcement of standards that other groups are not held to does not stand up in court. Such actions are no better than politically motivated censorship and will be judged as such. Pro-Palestinian activists should take heart and use this decision as precedent in defense of their own advocacy against the next stonewalling of their efforts.
SJP’s Win Is a Victory for All of Us - The Observer
The Arab Palestinians involved in academic and educational endeavors want to be part of the movement that is opposed to Israeli responsibilities to "take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety," in the disputed territories. (Article 43 of the Hague Convention)
To the members of the SJP, who are under the influence of the rarified gases that they are always right, and that the Arab Palestinian commitment to armed struggle is all about → equality coupled with respect and dignity. They use these lofty words to obscure the various criminal behaviors in the name cause of liberation against oppression furthered by foreign occupation. From the student standpoint, they see this promotion of acting against the perceived oppression as a great adventure.
But make no mistake → no college student or faculty member under the age of 70 can be a person displaced during the 1948 War of Independence. And since the creation of the State of Palestine, by Yasser Arafat in 1988, Israel has not taken any territory from the State of Palestine → absolutely none.
........View attachment 276324
Most Respectfully,
R
Huh!RE: Palestine Today (US Domestic Activities)
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Universities are no strangers to student counter-cultures undertakings and protest activities. It is a fact of life that officials have always lived with the threat of violence and the disruptions of normalized activities in the proximity of such gathering. Various university administrations have had to grapple with these movements that emerged of the last half of the 20th Century and spilling over into the 21st Century. As my father had said many times, "we will deal with it."
(COMMENT)SJP’s Win Is a Victory for All of Us
University administrators across the nation should look at the wording of the decision and take warning: capricious and unjustified selective enforcement of standards that other groups are not held to does not stand up in court. Such actions are no better than politically motivated censorship and will be judged as such. Pro-Palestinian activists should take heart and use this decision as precedent in defense of their own advocacy against the next stonewalling of their efforts.
SJP’s Win Is a Victory for All of Us - The Observer
The Arab Palestinians involved in academic and educational endeavors want to be part of the movement that is opposed to Israeli responsibilities to "take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety," in the disputed territories. (Article 43 of the Hague Convention)
To the members of the SJP, who are under the influence of the rarified gases that they are always right, and that the Arab Palestinian commitment to armed struggle is all about → equality coupled with respect and dignity. They use these lofty words to obscure the various criminal behaviors in the name cause of liberation against oppression furthered by foreign occupation. From the student standpoint, they see this promotion of acting against the perceived oppression as a great adventure.
But make no mistake → no college student or faculty member under the age of 70 can be a person displaced during the 1948 War of Independence. And since the creation of the State of Palestine, by Yasser Arafat in 1988, Israel has not taken any territory from the State of Palestine → absolutely none.
........View attachment 276324
Most Respectfully,
R
