Other candidates thinking about skipping fox debate

I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.

It's called "The Art of the Deal". Trump is winning the Deal. It was a bad deal for him and he knew it so he is going to hurt Fox where it hurts - in their bottom line.
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.

Odd talk from the party of the aged crooked hag and 3,000 year old socialist nincompoop.

The Dems are just as unraveled over Trump as the GOP... and BTW, I am no Trump supporter.
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.

Oh give it up, candy. You do not believe a word that come out of a right wingers mouth when they talked about Obama!!

All that rw hate was projection and paranoia on their part. In fact, the right is so confused that they can not tell if Obama "ran them over with ACA" or "never got anything done".

They don't know if Obama "never works with Republicans" or if their Republican politicians are being corrupted by "helping the President and his fellow Democrats pass bills such as TPP, Import-export Bank Charter, budget bill and breaking up Cruz's attempt to shut down the govt"


Rwingers are all over the place. Time one claims Obama is a pussy, another calls him a hard assed authoritarian trying to take their rights by force!

They are seriously screwed up, candycorn. They do not know what to say anymore.

Think about it--Trump is messing up the Democrats is their latest line. If what Trump is doing to the democrats is called "subversive", Then Tina Fey is one of the most subversive person in America!

Apparently, "subversive" must mean "entertaining to"!
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.

It's called "The Art of the Deal". Trump is winning the Deal. It was a bad deal for him and he knew it so he is going to hurt Fox where it hurts - in their bottom line.

Its and idiot move by a person who (like most of you guys) doesn't understand politics is a profession.

Let's see; you got the momentum going for you and instead of keeping it going; you are going to, by default, give a victory to one of your opponents; you can't win if you don't suit up.

In politics (not governing) if you're not on offense, you're on defense.

He'd better hope Cruz crashes and burns. The only threat to him for the GOP nomination has the floor all to himself.
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.

It's called "The Art of the Deal". Trump is winning the Deal. It was a bad deal for him and he knew it so he is going to hurt Fox where it hurts - in their bottom line.

Its and idiot move by a person who (like most of you guys) doesn't understand politics is a profession.

Let's see; you got the momentum going for you and instead of keeping it going; you are going to, by default, give a victory to one of your opponents; you can't win if you don't suit up.

In politics (not governing) if you're not on offense, you're on defense.

He'd better hope Cruz crashes and burns. The only threat to him for the GOP nomination has the floor all to himself.

Well, right now 85% of Republicans have stated that they will not watch the debate without Trump being there and Trump is holding a veterans thing at the same time as the debate. I predict those 85% will tune in to Trump's veterans support event.
 
How would Trump's campaign manager know what other candidates are thinking? I don't know what Breitbart is thinking but it looks like the other republican candidates are looking forward to the debate without Trump. Fox isn't obsessed with Trump any more than the left is obsessed with the former governor of Alaska but at least Trump is running for something.
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.
It's no longer about Obumble.

Your boy now has less than 12 months to go.

He's already morphing into yesterday's news.

The only attention he gets from now on is merely to limit him to doing the least possible damage to the Republic and its People on his way out the door.

Oh, and, once the party makes up its mind on a nominee, you're going to see a unity on the right side of the aisle that you haven't seen in eons.

Reinforced by vast numbers of fence-sitters and centrists who aren't committing until the race gets down to the wire.

Your side is in the process of losing power again.

And the longer you delude yourself about it, the easier the process.
 
How would Trump's campaign manager know what other candidates are thinking? I don't know what Breitbart is thinking but it looks like the other republican candidates are looking forward to the debate without Trump. Fox isn't obsessed with Trump any more than the left is obsessed with the former governor of Alaska but at least Trump is running for something.
I wouldn't be surprised if Ailes is thinking of Trump a lot tonight.. Even to the point of being obsessed.
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.

It's called "The Art of the Deal". Trump is winning the Deal. It was a bad deal for him and he knew it so he is going to hurt Fox where it hurts - in their bottom line.

Its and idiot move by a person who (like most of you guys) doesn't understand politics is a profession.

Let's see; you got the momentum going for you and instead of keeping it going; you are going to, by default, give a victory to one of your opponents; you can't win if you don't suit up.

In politics (not governing) if you're not on offense, you're on defense.

He'd better hope Cruz crashes and burns. The only threat to him for the GOP nomination has the floor all to himself.

Well, right now 85% of Republicans have stated that they will not watch the debate without Trump being there and Trump is holding a veterans thing at the same time as the debate. I predict those 85% will tune in to Trump's veterans support event.


He will out draw the GOP debate for at least a segment of the broadcast; no doubt. He will be entertaining, interesting, and you never know what he'll say or do. Much like a south L.A. police chase. And the trophy for outdrawing the GOP debate is what exactly? Oh yeah, a big middle finger to Megan Kelly.

The voters who are going to caucus in Iowa in a tight race are the audience that matters and if they are undecided...Trump is losing a chance to convince them and delivering a victory to his debate opponents on a silver platter.
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.

Odd talk from the party of the aged crooked hag and 3,000 year old socialist nincompoop.

The Dems are just as unraveled over Trump as the GOP... and BTW, I am no Trump supporter.

And amazingly, I think your Messiah is older than either Ms. Clinton or Senator Sanders. That you didn't know that is, well, not surprising. You're not very bright.
 
Never thought I'd say this, but fox is completely in the right here.
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.


Oh, and, once the party makes up its mind on a nominee, you're going to see a unity on the right side of the aisle that you haven't seen in eons.

Reinforced by vast numbers of fence-sitters and centrists who aren't committing until the race gets down to the wire.

Your side is in the process of losing power again.

And the longer you delude yourself about it, the easier the process.

Another political idiot. If the party could not unite behind a milquetoast like Romney, you think they're going to unite behind a bombastic blowhard like Trump or Ted Cruz?

You should go back to whatever college you went and demand a full refund; you're woefully unprepared for adulthood.
 
I can see the party coming apart at the seams.

You'd think that after 8 years of Obama you guys would be wary of a guy who surrounds himself with yes-men. Now you want a guy who wants to pre-select the people allowed to question him?

It just goes to underscore that GOP/Conserve-Hate-Ive opposition to Obama was not based on policies or behavior but mainly skin color. You're supporting someone who is 3,000% more self-centered than even the lampoonist claims you've guys made about Obama.


Oh, and, once the party makes up its mind on a nominee, you're going to see a unity on the right side of the aisle that you haven't seen in eons.

Reinforced by vast numbers of fence-sitters and centrists who aren't committing until the race gets down to the wire.

Your side is in the process of losing power again.

And the longer you delude yourself about it, the easier the process.

Another political idiot. If the party could not unite behind a milquetoast like Romney, you think they're going to unite behind a bombastic blowhard like Trump or Ted Cruz?

You should go back to whatever college you went and demand a full refund; you're woefully unprepared for adulthood.
Thank you for your feedback.

Milquetoasts do not inspire... bombasts can and oftentimes do.

You will understand all of this much better, though, on the morning of November 9, 2016.
 

Forum List

Back
Top