Oregon imposes gag order on Christian bakers in gay wedding case

They did NOT discriminate based on sex,race,sexual orientation,disability etc.
Yes, they did, which is against the law.
Nope they didn't. Again even the mentally ill faggots said they didn't. ONLY the political hack said they did and he is lying. I bet they served faggots before and could not have cared less...big difference in serving a faggot and making a cake for a faggots wedding.
There is no difference, which is why they are out of business, facing the large fine, and now even in more trouble for breaking yet another law.
 
4HATzMW.jpg
Bake the cake, don't bake cakes, or close up, your call...
 
They already closed. So we can thank faggots and carpet munchers for 2 more people on the government dole. :) Bet your kind is proud the blame is squarely on your shoulders. The cake makers should move to a friendlier less totalitarian fascist state that wants their business.
They should have done their job, in the first place. Had they, they would still be in business.
I'm looking forward to some law suits making gays perform services for people they don't agree with. I'm guessing doing your job will change quickly.
Do what you are paid to do, that is all that is required. Leave your faith at home and at church. Baking cakes for cash is not faith.
Your faith is not a shirt you put on and off. Just because I am out and about doesn't mean I no longer believe in my beliefs...same for them. Oh and I am no christian either. So....not defending them because of that. They did what is allowed and right then faggots should have done what 99 out of 100 people would do and went and found someone else willing to take their cash. I know being mentally ill that thought never crossed their diseased minds obviously.
Had they done what is right, no one would have ever heard of them, and that was to bake the cake, exactly what they were paid to do...
They weren't paid. They respectfully declined. Period. I don't HAVE to take your business if I don't want to and I don't HAVE to give you a reason. Try suing me for that...
 
They did NOT discriminate based on sex,race,sexual orientation,disability etc.
Yes, they did, which is against the law.
Nope they didn't. Again even the mentally ill faggots said they didn't. ONLY the political hack said they did and he is lying. I bet they served faggots before and could not have cared less...big difference in serving a faggot and making a cake for a faggots wedding.
There is no difference, which is why they are out of business, facing the large fine, and now even in more trouble for breaking yet another law.
Lol in trouble for using their first amendment. Keep digging your grave little tyrant mein fuhrer.
 
And they will lose. The SC has already rejected such things, even before last week. Bake the cake, or be put out of business...
They already closed. So we can thank faggots and carpet munchers for 2 more people on the government dole. :) Bet your kind is proud the blame is squarely on your shoulders. The cake makers should move to a friendlier less totalitarian fascist state that wants their business.
They should have done their job, in the first place. Had they, they would still be in business.
I'm looking forward to some law suits making gays perform services for people they don't agree with. I'm guessing doing your job will change quickly.
Do what you are paid to do, that is all that is required. Leave your faith at home and at church. Baking cakes for cash is not faith.
So if I am paying you for a job you didn't want in the first place and actually refused to take you can now be forced to not only do that job but do it to the person forcing you's satisfaction. I'm searching for a gay owned business. I'm going to make that fucker do some incredibly humiliating shit and if he doesn't he owes me 135k. After all it is what he's paid to do.
If you sell gas, you sell gas to *******, Jews, wetbacks, whops, and all others. To not do so means we are going to come down on you like a house of bricks. Now you know....
 
They did NOT discriminate based on sex,race,sexual orientation,disability etc.
Yes, they did, which is against the law.
Nope they didn't. Again even the mentally ill faggots said they didn't. ONLY the political hack said they did and he is lying. I bet they served faggots before and could not have cared less...big difference in serving a faggot and making a cake for a faggots wedding.
There is no difference, which is why they are out of business, facing the large fine, and now even in more trouble for breaking yet another law.
Lol in trouble for using their first amendment. Keep digging your grave little tyrant mein fuhrer.
The 1st does not apply in this case. This is business, not faith.
 
It's good to see more awareness that freedom of speech, in particular freedom of political expression, is what's being sacrificed with these laws.
 
They should have done their job, in the first place. Had they, they would still be in business.
I'm looking forward to some law suits making gays perform services for people they don't agree with. I'm guessing doing your job will change quickly.
Do what you are paid to do, that is all that is required. Leave your faith at home and at church. Baking cakes for cash is not faith.
Your faith is not a shirt you put on and off. Just because I am out and about doesn't mean I no longer believe in my beliefs...same for them. Oh and I am no christian either. So....not defending them because of that. They did what is allowed and right then faggots should have done what 99 out of 100 people would do and went and found someone else willing to take their cash. I know being mentally ill that thought never crossed their diseased minds obviously.
Had they done what is right, no one would have ever heard of them, and that was to bake the cake, exactly what they were paid to do...
They weren't paid. They respectfully declined. Period. I don't HAVE to take your business if I don't want to and I don't HAVE to give you a reason. Try suing me for that...
It's a snap to sue you, and I don't need a reason to but in this case they had one, and the courts agreed.
 
"Oregon trying to silence dissent on homosexuals from harassed Cake Bakers"

No, this is just another ridiculous lie from the right.
You didn't read or can't. Not my problem.
They already closed. So we can thank faggots and carpet munchers for 2 more people on the government dole. :) Bet your kind is proud the blame is squarely on your shoulders. The cake makers should move to a friendlier less totalitarian fascist state that wants their business.
They should have done their job, in the first place. Had they, they would still be in business.
I'm looking forward to some law suits making gays perform services for people they don't agree with. I'm guessing doing your job will change quickly.
Do what you are paid to do, that is all that is required. Leave your faith at home and at church. Baking cakes for cash is not faith.
So if I am paying you for a job you didn't want in the first place and actually refused to take you can now be forced to not only do that job but do it to the person forcing you's satisfaction. I'm searching for a gay owned business. I'm going to make that fucker do some incredibly humiliating shit and if he doesn't he owes me 135k. After all it is what he's paid to do.
If you sell gas, you sell gas to *******, Jews, wetbacks, whops, and all others. To not do so means we are going to come down on you like a house of bricks. Now you know....
Selling gas has nothing to do with promoting or advocating your approval for a sacred moment in someone's life. Marriage cake is and does.

They did NOT discriminate based on sex,race,sexual orientation,disability etc.
Yes, they did, which is against the law.
Nope they didn't. Again even the mentally ill faggots said they didn't. ONLY the political hack said they did and he is lying. I bet they served faggots before and could not have cared less...big difference in serving a faggot and making a cake for a faggots wedding.
There is no difference, which is why they are out of business, facing the large fine, and now even in more trouble for breaking yet another law.
Lol in trouble for using their first amendment. Keep digging your grave little tyrant mein fuhrer.
The 1st does not apply in this case. This is business, not faith.
Oh yes first amendment quite clearly does. You should try reading the link first.
I'm looking forward to some law suits making gays perform services for people they don't agree with. I'm guessing doing your job will change quickly.
Do what you are paid to do, that is all that is required. Leave your faith at home and at church. Baking cakes for cash is not faith.
Your faith is not a shirt you put on and off. Just because I am out and about doesn't mean I no longer believe in my beliefs...same for them. Oh and I am no christian either. So....not defending them because of that. They did what is allowed and right then faggots should have done what 99 out of 100 people would do and went and found someone else willing to take their cash. I know being mentally ill that thought never crossed their diseased minds obviously.
Had they done what is right, no one would have ever heard of them, and that was to bake the cake, exactly what they were paid to do...
They weren't paid. They respectfully declined. Period. I don't HAVE to take your business if I don't want to and I don't HAVE to give you a reason. Try suing me for that...
It's a snap to sue you, and I don't need a reason to but in this case they had one, and the courts agreed.
It wasn't a court but 1 person. aka dictator with political ambition for higher office.
 
It's good to see more awareness that freedom of speech, in particular freedom of political expression, is what's being sacrificed with these laws.
Welcome to the real world, where your Freedom of Speech can be very expensive.
You mean the new United Socialist States of America. Just picking up where USSR left off...
Nope. These are well-established laws. If you bake cakes, serve one, serve all. It's not complicated, and it's business, not faith.
 
You can keep bleating about that all night long freedom of speech is freedom of speech and you can't FORCE someone to not talk....sorry now how it works in America....yet anyways.
It's good to see more awareness that freedom of speech, in particular freedom of political expression, is what's being sacrificed with these laws.
Welcome to the real world, where your Freedom of Speech can be very expensive.
You mean the new United Socialist States of America. Just picking up where USSR left off...
Nope. These are well-established laws. If you bake cakes, serve one, serve all. It's not complicated, and it's business, not faith.
 
You can keep bleating about that all night long freedom of speech is freedom of speech and you can't FORCE someone to not talk....sorry now how it works in America....yet anyways.
It's good to see more awareness that freedom of speech, in particular freedom of political expression, is what's being sacrificed with these laws.
Welcome to the real world, where your Freedom of Speech can be very expensive.
You mean the new United Socialist States of America. Just picking up where USSR left off...
Nope. These are well-established laws. If you bake cakes, serve one, serve all. It's not complicated, and it's business, not faith.
Hit the hay, you've already hit the bottle...
 
It's good to see more awareness that freedom of speech, in particular freedom of political expression, is what's being sacrificed with these laws.
Welcome to the real world, where your Freedom of Speech can be very expensive.
You mean the new United Socialist States of America. Just picking up where USSR left off...
Nope. These are well-established laws. If you bake cakes, serve one, serve all. It's not complicated, and it's business, not faith.
Curious,
How do you feel about the network pulling the Dukes of Hazzard reruns off the air because of the confederate flag being painted on the car.
 
It's good to see more awareness that freedom of speech, in particular freedom of political expression, is what's being sacrificed with these laws.
Welcome to the real world, where your Freedom of Speech can be very expensive.
You mean the new United Socialist States of America. Just picking up where USSR left off...
Nope. These are well-established laws. If you bake cakes, serve one, serve all. It's not complicated, and it's business, not faith.
Curious,
How do you feel about the network pulling the Dukes of Hazzard reruns off the air because of the confederate flag being painted on the car.
Welcome to capitalism. Very few want bad press, it's hard on the bottom line. You like capitalism, right?
 
It's good to see more awareness that freedom of speech, in particular freedom of political expression, is what's being sacrificed with these laws.
Welcome to the real world, where your Freedom of Speech can be very expensive.
You mean the new United Socialist States of America. Just picking up where USSR left off...
Nope. These are well-established laws. If you bake cakes, serve one, serve all. It's not complicated, and it's business, not faith.
Curious,
How do you feel about the network pulling the Dukes of Hazzard reruns off the air because of the confederate flag being painted on the car.
Welcome to capitalism. Very few want bad press, it's hard on the bottom line. You like capitalism, right?
why shouldn't that same choice be available to a Christian baker? Do you think someone should win a lawsuit over the Dukes being pulled because of a symbol that is offensive to some, or do you think that in a capitalist way the network should have the say in how they present themselves.
 
Welcome to the real world, where your Freedom of Speech can be very expensive.
You mean the new United Socialist States of America. Just picking up where USSR left off...
Nope. These are well-established laws. If you bake cakes, serve one, serve all. It's not complicated, and it's business, not faith.
Curious,
How do you feel about the network pulling the Dukes of Hazzard reruns off the air because of the confederate flag being painted on the car.
Welcome to capitalism. Very few want bad press, it's hard on the bottom line. You like capitalism, right?
why shouldn't that same choice be available to a Christian baker? Do you think someone should win a lawsuit over the Dukes being pulled because of a symbol that is offensive to some, or do you think that in a capitalist way the network should have the say in how they present themselves.
The network is doing what is best for business. Had Melissa done that, she would still be in business. That's capitalism, not faith...
 

Forum List

Back
Top