Oregon county nullifies gun laws

[tyroneweaver]

Weeks After Mass Shooting, Oregon County Votes To Nullify Gun Control Laws

sounds alright and perfectly legal
Sanctuary cities
mary jane fed law

 

[DarkFury]

Interesting story and surely a law suit coming.

 

[The Great Goose]

So does this mean it's good or bad?

 

[DarkFury]

So does this mean it's good or bad?

Good in the sense they did it. But could be bad as far as costs to TRY and keep it.

 

[The Great Goose]

So does this mean it's good or bad?

Good in the sense they did it. But could be bad as far as costs to TRY and keep it.

I dont understand.

 

[pismoe]

little I know about Sheriffs is that they are the highest source of law in a county . They are also elected by the people of the county and I think that this applies to only 1 county .

 

[DarkFury]

So does this mean it's good or bad?

Good in the sense they did it. But could be bad as far as costs to TRY and keep it.

I dont understand.

Okay, gun ownership here in America is VERY important to us. So while the new law upholds that government WILL fight it.
Our government at least with the "liberal" party wants to remove that right so any law supporting it is attacked by government.

 

[The Great Goose]

So does this mean it's good or bad?

Good in the sense they did it. But could be bad as far as costs to TRY and keep it.

I dont understand.

Okay, gun ownership here in America is VERY important to us. So while the new law upholds that government WILL fight it.
Our government at least with the "liberal" party wants to remove that right so any law supporting it is attacked by government.

So the article is postive for gun owners?

 

[DarkFury]

So does this mean it's good or bad?

Good in the sense they did it. But could be bad as far as costs to TRY and keep it.

I dont understand.

Okay, gun ownership here in America is VERY important to us. So while the new law upholds that government WILL fight it.
Our government at least with the "liberal" party wants to remove that right so any law supporting it is attacked by government.

So the article is postive for gun owners?

Yes.

 

[tyroneweaver]

So does this mean it's good or bad?

Good in the sense they did it. But could be bad as far as costs to TRY and keep it.

I dont understand.

Okay, gun ownership here in America is VERY important to us. So while the new law upholds that government WILL fight it.
Our government at least with the "liberal" party wants to remove that right so Ifany law supporting it is attacked by government.

So the article is postive for gun owners?

yes.
But it will show a double standard that liberals don't have to obey laws but conservative leaning citizens have to .
But in reality gun owners aren't going to abide by new laws, and sheriffs won't enforce em.