Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm confused..if it's called the "Bush" doctrine, why is it she's expected to stick to it with the "McCain" administration?
Irrelevent----show me where the Bush Doctrine is written down, set in stone and recognized to mean one thing that everyone agrees on !
Yes he was right, regardless of the WMD debate. He had ample justification without the Doctrine, simply because Saddam did not abide by the terms of his GW1 surrender. Secondly, with the Doctrine, he was justified since Saddam was assisting Al Queda.
Oh. So it's because the left insists the above that she's expected to fall in line.
Got it.
AWFUL.
Not only did she clearly show she knows nothing about foreign policy and was completely repeating the same crap told to her by McCain, but she also said absolutely nothing except, "Well, don't you know Alaska and Russia are real close so I've got plenty of experience with them."
Fantastic, now lets all go out and get some mooseburgers
http://www.usmessageboard.com/528718-post178.htmlno. not "regardless of the WMD" debate. It was all out bullshit and pretending that saddam, a secular fucking leader, was in cahoots with fundamentalist extremism won't make that any less pertinent.
What other countries do we have ample excuse for invading?
At what point in your view does the cost (lives money etc) become to great to justify an invasion?
*yawn*
Do you lefties actually believe the more you post this same old bullshit that it will somehow come true?
You hold Palin to a zero-defect standard; yet, let your own candidate slide for saying properly inflating your tires will offset offshore drilling.
All of this smear just adds up to fear and desperation. Get a clue.
Tire pressure: Wasting 1.2 Billion Gallons
Let's start with tire pressure. Even McCain finally admitted Aug. 5 that keeping tires properly inflated is a good idea and can save fuel:{/quote]
It's kind of funny how McCain scoffs at something first and then realizes he made an ass out of himself and then backtracks and amends his answer..
The Tire-Gauge Solution: No Joke - TIME
But who's really out of touch? The Bush Administration estimates that expanded offshore drilling could increase oil production by 200,000 bbl. per day by 2030. We use about 20 million bbl. per day, so that would meet about 1% of our demand two decades from now. Meanwhile, efficiency experts say that keeping tires inflated can improve gas mileage 3%, and regular maintenance can add another 4%. Many drivers already follow their advice, but if everyone did, we could immediately reduce demand several percentage points. In other words: Obama is right.
I'm not sure why the Republicans feel the need to continuously distort or misrepresent the FACTS but seriously, c'mon don't you think it's time to knock it off?
actually Gunny, Obama isn't incorrect in saying that inflating tires to the proper pressure would reduce oil consumption RIGHT NOW which is when we actually NEED IT!
here is what Obama said on the matter:
YouTube - Obama Insists Inflating Tires Better Than Oil Drilling
and here are several supporting articles regarding this issue
FactCheck: Inflating Tires vs. Offshore Drilling | Newsweek Politics: Campaign 2008 | Newsweek.com
Tire pressure: Wasting 1.2 Billion Gallons
Let's start with tire pressure. Even McCain finally admitted Aug. 5 that keeping tires properly inflated is a good idea and can save fuel:{/quote]
It's kind of funny how McCain scoffs at something first and then realizes he made an ass out of himself and then backtracks and amends his answer..
The Tire-Gauge Solution: No Joke - TIME
I'm not sure why the Republicans feel the need to continuously distort or misrepresent the FACTS but seriously, c'mon don't you think it's time to knock it off?
Claiming only republicans distort facts is idiotic.
actually Gunny, Obama isn't incorrect in saying that inflating tires to the proper pressure would reduce oil consumption RIGHT NOW which is when we actually NEED IT!
here is what Obama said on the matter:
YouTube - Obama Insists Inflating Tires Better Than Oil Drilling
and here are several supporting articles regarding this issue
FactCheck: Inflating Tires vs. Offshore Drilling | Newsweek Politics: Campaign 2008 | Newsweek.com
Claiming only republicans distort facts is idiotic.
I'm addressing this particular fact dillo...if you'd like to discusss others feel free to make a thread and I'll gladly join you in there....
actually Gunny, Obama isn't incorrect in saying that inflating tires to the proper pressure would reduce oil consumption RIGHT NOW which is when we actually NEED IT!
here is what Obama said on the matter:
YouTube - Obama Insists Inflating Tires Better Than Oil Drilling
and here are several supporting articles regarding this issue
FactCheck: Inflating Tires vs. Offshore Drilling | Newsweek Politics: Campaign 2008 | Newsweek.com
Tire pressure: Wasting 1.2 Billion Gallons
Let's start with tire pressure. Even McCain finally admitted Aug. 5 that keeping tires properly inflated is a good idea and can save fuel:{/quote]
It's kind of funny how McCain scoffs at something first and then realizes he made an ass out of himself and then backtracks and amends his answer..
The Tire-Gauge Solution: No Joke - TIME
I'm not sure why the Republicans feel the need to continuously distort or misrepresent the FACTS but seriously, c'mon don't you think it's time to knock it off?
IN THIS POST you claim that Republicans CONTINUOUSLY distort or misrepresent facts.
why do you only call attention to them? This forum is jam packed full of distortions and lies made by democrats
Why am I not surprised that you'd attack the messenger when the message proves you and all the other liberals wrong about the Osama-Saddam connection? However the FR simply summarizes reporting by the FAS, so now you attack them as well.oh a link to the free republic! ....
The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) was founded in 1945 by scientists who had worked on the Manhattan Project to develop the first atomic bombs. These scientists recognized that science had become central to many key public policy questions. They believed that scientists had a unique responsibility to both warn the public and policy leaders of potential dangers from scientific and technical advances and to show how good policy could increase the benefits of new scientific knowledge.