On Obama's Hatred of Religion

[HenryBHough]

Is there really any reason to debate Obama's attitude toward "religion"?

I mean, where in history of belief systems has there even been a "God", even the tinniest little one, who looked favourably upon those who practiced the worship of any OTHER "God"?

1. "Is there really any reason to debate Obama's attitude toward "religion"?"
Hank....there is no debate here.
The facts in the thread clearly show Obama' antipathy to religion.

a. Is it important?
Well....yeah. He has the power to influence the religious freedom of Americans....and not in a good way.
And he does so.

2. Further, the thread was designed to indicate that his sociological perspective is not one of an American provenance, but of the irrational French Revolution, and tied to totalitarian thought.


3. "I mean, where in history of belief systems has there even been a "God", even the tinniest little one, who looked favourably upon those who practiced the worship of any OTHER "God"?"

It's not clear what you mean by this.

The short summary:

With the understanding that Our Narcissistic Kenyan Emperor believes He IS "God" and given that all "Gods" despise those who worship any other "God" then His hatred of religions is simply natural.

 

[Synthaholic]

PC flatly has no idea about Obama's religious convictions.

For her to suggest that she does is a fabrication of an immense magnitude.

Yes, PC is really that big a liar.

Why is it that folks address you as 'Fakey'?

Because they don't believe he's a Republican like he has always claimed.

 

[Bfgrn]

Is there really any reason to debate Obama's attitude toward "religion"?

Depends on what you mean by 'debate'. If its just you pretending you speak for Obama on his religious faith, probably not.

This is the point where you get to clarify: are you really this stupid, or are you simply a liar?

RSVP.

I just don't accept your personal opinion about the religious convictions of a man you don't know, have never met, nor even been in the same room with as amounting to much.

Especially when you're contradicted by the man himself.

Why would I ignore Obama on his own beliefs?

"I just don't accept your personal opinion..."

Thank you for clearing that up....it's stupidity rather than dishonesty.
Slightly better.

So...for edification, I'll provide items found in earlier posts that document Obama's antipathy to religion and the religious freedom of American citizens.


1. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

In the case,Obama's lawyers made the argument that the federal government could force a Lutheran Church to pick as minister, whomever the government decided.

Get that???
Obama claimed the authority to choose a church's ministers.


2. Not a month later, Obama demanded that all employers, no matter religious or not, pay for contraception and abortion-inducing pills for their employees!

So, over a two month period,
a. he demanded the power to determine who a church could or must hire, and

b. the power to demand that churches pay for sexual practices.


3.Cardinal Francis George of Chicago comments on the restrictions that Obama would impose:
"...-- no schools, religious publications, health care institutions, organized charity, ministry for justice and the works of mercy that flow naturally from a living faith. All of these were co-opted by the government."

4. And Cardinal Dolan of NYC revealed that Obama actually had the gall to instruct the bishops on how to conduct their religion:
"...advised the bishops’ conference that we should listen to the “enlightened” voicesof accommodation, such as the recent, hardly surprising yet terribly unfortunate editorial in America.The White House seems to think we bishops simply do not know or understand Catholic teaching and so, taking a cue from its own definition of religious freedom, now has nominated its own handpicked official Catholic teachers."
http://www.catholicvote.org/cardina...b-staff-on-howto-interpret-catholic-teaching/



Consider yourself fed.

Interesting...

And Cardinal Dolan of NYC revealed that Obama actually had the gall to instruct the bishops on how to conduct their religion:
"...advised the bishops’ conference that we should listen to the “enlightened” voices of accommodation

Enlightened voices...like THE POPE?

Pope Says Church Is ‘Obsessed’ With Gays, Abortion and Birth Control

Six months into his papacy, Pope Francis sent shock waves through the Roman Catholic church on Thursday with the publication of his remarks that the church had grown “obsessed” with abortion, gay marriage and contraception, and that he had chosen not to talk about those issues despite recriminations from critics.

His surprising comments came in a lengthy interview in which he criticized the church for putting dogma before love, and for prioritizing moral doctrines over serving the poor and marginalized. He articulated his vision of an inclusive church, a “home for all” — which is a striking contrast with his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, the doctrinal defender who envisioned a smaller, purer church.

Francis told the interviewer, a fellow Jesuit: “It is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time. The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently.

“We have to find a new balance,” the pope continued, “otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel.”

NYT

 

[Skylar]

Is there really any reason to debate Obama's attitude toward "religion"?

Depends on what you mean by 'debate'. If its just you pretending you speak for Obama on his religious faith, probably not.

This is the point where you get to clarify: are you really this stupid, or are you simply a liar?

RSVP.

I just don't accept your personal opinion about the religious convictions of a man you don't know, have never met, nor even been in the same room with as amounting to much.

Especially when you're contradicted by the man himself.

Why would I ignore Obama on his own beliefs?

"I just don't accept your personal opinion..."

Thank you for clearing that up....it's stupidity rather than dishonesty.
Slightly better.

So...for edification, I'll provide items found in earlier posts that document Obama's antipathy to religion and the religious freedom of American citizens.


1. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

In the case,Obama's lawyers made the argument that the federal government could force a Lutheran Church to pick as minister, whomever the government decided.

Get that???
Obama claimed the authority to choose a church's ministers.


2. Not a month later, Obama demanded that all employers, no matter religious or not, pay for contraception and abortion-inducing pills for their employees!

So, over a two month period,
a. he demanded the power to determine who a church could or must hire, and

b. the power to demand that churches pay for sexual practices.


3.Cardinal Francis George of Chicago comments on the restrictions that Obama would impose:
"...-- no schools, religious publications, health care institutions, organized charity, ministry for justice and the works of mercy that flow naturally from a living faith. All of these were co-opted by the government."

4. And Cardinal Dolan of NYC revealed that Obama actually had the gall to instruct the bishops on how to conduct their religion:
"...advised the bishops’ conference that we should listen to the “enlightened” voicesof accommodation, such as the recent, hardly surprising yet terribly unfortunate editorial in America.The White House seems to think we bishops simply do not know or understand Catholic teaching and so, taking a cue from its own definition of religious freedom, now has nominated its own handpicked official Catholic teachers."
http://www.catholicvote.org/cardina...b-staff-on-howto-interpret-catholic-teaching/



Consider yourself fed.

Interesting...

And Cardinal Dolan of NYC revealed that Obama actually had the gall to instruct the bishops on how to conduct their religion:
"...advised the bishops’ conference that we should listen to the “enlightened” voices of accommodation

Enlightened voices...like THE POPE?

Pope Says Church Is ‘Obsessed’ With Gays, Abortion and Birth Control

Six months into his papacy, Pope Francis sent shock waves through the Roman Catholic church on Thursday with the publication of his remarks that the church had grown “obsessed” with abortion, gay marriage and contraception, and that he had chosen not to talk about those issues despite recriminations from critics.

His surprising comments came in a lengthy interview in which he criticized the church for putting dogma before love, and for prioritizing moral doctrines over serving the poor and marginalized. He articulated his vision of an inclusive church, a “home for all” — which is a striking contrast with his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, the doctrinal defender who envisioned a smaller, purer church.

Francis told the interviewer, a fellow Jesuit: “It is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time. The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently.

“We have to find a new balance,” the pope continued, “otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel.”

NYT

In Dolan's defense, what does a flaming liberal like the Pope know about Catholicism.

 

[Bfgrn]

Is there really any reason to debate Obama's attitude toward "religion"?

Depends on what you mean by 'debate'. If its just you pretending you speak for Obama on his religious faith, probably not.

This is the point where you get to clarify: are you really this stupid, or are you simply a liar?

RSVP.

I just don't accept your personal opinion about the religious convictions of a man you don't know, have never met, nor even been in the same room with as amounting to much.

Especially when you're contradicted by the man himself.

Why would I ignore Obama on his own beliefs?

"I just don't accept your personal opinion..."

Thank you for clearing that up....it's stupidity rather than dishonesty.
Slightly better.

So...for edification, I'll provide items found in earlier posts that document Obama's antipathy to religion and the religious freedom of American citizens.


1. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

In the case,Obama's lawyers made the argument that the federal government could force a Lutheran Church to pick as minister, whomever the government decided.

Get that???
Obama claimed the authority to choose a church's ministers.

Hosanna-Tabor was about a teacher who was fired by a Lutheran school in 2005 after she had to leave the school with narcolepsy for a year. Even the Lutheran schooled titled her a 'Called Teacher'.

The debate wasn't if the government could appoint a minister. But if she was a minister or a teacher. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission held that she was a teacher. As did the 6th Circuit Court of appeals. The school argued that she was a minister.

The SCOTUS agreed wit the school on her job definition. And Obama didn't argue this case. The Equal Employment Opportunity Comission did. And EEOC brought the suit under George Bush. And made the same argument before Obama was elected as they did after.

Making your assertion that the EEOC's position reflected Obama's personal views on religion to be laughable nonsense. All of which you'd know if you'd ever read the case.

But you don't, Chic. You simply regurgitate other websites, other arguments. You never actually fact check anything. Which is why you fail.

2. Not a month later, Obama demanded that all employers, no matter religious or not, pay for contraception and abortion-inducing pills for their employees!

Actually, Obama offered a specific religious exemption. And didn't include 'abortion inducing pills'. Worse for your claims, the HHS guidelines came out in August of 2011. 2 months BEFORE the Hossana case was even argued.

Obama Administration Approves Mandated Contraception Coverage Daily News NCRegister.com

You have no idea what you're talking about. You're just mechanically repeating whatever you've been told to think. You've never actually researched any of this, fact checked any of your claims.

And your ignorance is apparent. As you keep making foolish mistakes.

Consider yourself fed.

Try that line when you've actually researched the topic you're attempting to discuss, Parrot.

Research THEN comment. Doing it the other way around leads to embarrassing blunders like the ones you just made.

PC up in flames AGAIN...

 

[Bfgrn]

Depends on what you mean by 'debate'. If its just you pretending you speak for Obama on his religious faith, probably not.

This is the point where you get to clarify: are you really this stupid, or are you simply a liar?

RSVP.

I just don't accept your personal opinion about the religious convictions of a man you don't know, have never met, nor even been in the same room with as amounting to much.

Especially when you're contradicted by the man himself.

Why would I ignore Obama on his own beliefs?

"I just don't accept your personal opinion..."

Thank you for clearing that up....it's stupidity rather than dishonesty.
Slightly better.

So...for edification, I'll provide items found in earlier posts that document Obama's antipathy to religion and the religious freedom of American citizens.


1. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

In the case,Obama's lawyers made the argument that the federal government could force a Lutheran Church to pick as minister, whomever the government decided.

Get that???
Obama claimed the authority to choose a church's ministers.


2. Not a month later, Obama demanded that all employers, no matter religious or not, pay for contraception and abortion-inducing pills for their employees!

So, over a two month period,
a. he demanded the power to determine who a church could or must hire, and

b. the power to demand that churches pay for sexual practices.


3.Cardinal Francis George of Chicago comments on the restrictions that Obama would impose:
"...-- no schools, religious publications, health care institutions, organized charity, ministry for justice and the works of mercy that flow naturally from a living faith. All of these were co-opted by the government."

4. And Cardinal Dolan of NYC revealed that Obama actually had the gall to instruct the bishops on how to conduct their religion:
"...advised the bishops’ conference that we should listen to the “enlightened” voicesof accommodation, such as the recent, hardly surprising yet terribly unfortunate editorial in America.The White House seems to think we bishops simply do not know or understand Catholic teaching and so, taking a cue from its own definition of religious freedom, now has nominated its own handpicked official Catholic teachers."
http://www.catholicvote.org/cardina...b-staff-on-howto-interpret-catholic-teaching/



Consider yourself fed.

Interesting...

And Cardinal Dolan of NYC revealed that Obama actually had the gall to instruct the bishops on how to conduct their religion:
"...advised the bishops’ conference that we should listen to the “enlightened” voices of accommodation

Enlightened voices...like THE POPE?

Pope Says Church Is ‘Obsessed’ With Gays, Abortion and Birth Control

Six months into his papacy, Pope Francis sent shock waves through the Roman Catholic church on Thursday with the publication of his remarks that the church had grown “obsessed” with abortion, gay marriage and contraception, and that he had chosen not to talk about those issues despite recriminations from critics.

His surprising comments came in a lengthy interview in which he criticized the church for putting dogma before love, and for prioritizing moral doctrines over serving the poor and marginalized. He articulated his vision of an inclusive church, a “home for all” — which is a striking contrast with his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, the doctrinal defender who envisioned a smaller, purer church.

Francis told the interviewer, a fellow Jesuit: “It is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time. The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently.

“We have to find a new balance,” the pope continued, “otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel.”

NYT

In Dolan's defense, what does a flaming liberal like the Pope know about Catholicism.

Yea, Dolan is a pillar of morality...

Documents show Milwaukee archdiocese shielded pedophile priests

Cardinal Timothy Dolan of the U.S. arrives for a meeting at the Synod Hall at the Vatican, March 9, 2013.
Reuters/Alessandro Bianchi

(Reuters) - Roman Catholic Church officials in Milwaukee vigorously shielded pedophile priests and protected church funds from lawsuits during a decades-long sex abuse scandal, according to hundreds of documents released on Monday.

The documents include letters and deposition testimony from Cardinal and Archbishop of New York Timothy Dolan who, during his time as archbishop of Milwaukee from 2002 to 2009, appealed to Vatican on numerous occasions to help address the ongoing fallout from the scandal.

The 6,000 pages of documents related to eight decades of abuse cases showed in great detail the Milwaukee archdiocese regularly reassigned priests who were accused of sexual molestation to new parishes and Dolan himself asking the Vatican permission to transfer $57 million to a trust fund to protect it against court action.

In 2011, the Milwaukee archdiocese filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, citing the financial drain of settling sexual-abuse claims and acknowledging missteps by the church in dealing with pedophile priests.

The judge overseeing the archdiocese's bankruptcy ordered the documents to be released.

The Roman Catholic Church has been hit with a series of abuse accusations and scandals during the past two decades, in the United States and elsewhere. The scandals have cost the U.S. church about $3 billion in settlements and driven prominent dioceses such as the one in Milwaukee, into bankruptcy.

One document is a letter that Dolan sent to the Vatican in June 2007 requesting permission to move $57 million into a cemetery trust fund in order to protect the funds from "any legal claim and liability." The Vatican approved the transfer a month later, according to the documents.

During a news conference on Monday, Jeff Anderson, an attorney representing more than 500 abuse victims, said the money was to be used to "pay off some of the offenders to quietly go away."

 

[JoeB131]

The short summary:

With the understanding that Our Narcissistic Kenyan Emperor believes He IS "God" and given that all "Gods" despise those who worship any other "God" then His hatred of religions is simply natural.

Wow, that's even crazier than PC"s rants.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is the point where you get to clarify: are you really this stupid, or are you simply a liar?

RSVP.

I just don't accept your personal opinion about the religious convictions of a man you don't know, have never met, nor even been in the same room with as amounting to much.

Especially when you're contradicted by the man himself.

Why would I ignore Obama on his own beliefs?

"I just don't accept your personal opinion..."

Thank you for clearing that up....it's stupidity rather than dishonesty.
Slightly better.

So...for edification, I'll provide items found in earlier posts that document Obama's antipathy to religion and the religious freedom of American citizens.


1. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

In the case,Obama's lawyers made the argument that the federal government could force a Lutheran Church to pick as minister, whomever the government decided.

Get that???
Obama claimed the authority to choose a church's ministers.

Hosanna-Tabor was about a teacher who was fired by a Lutheran school in 2005 after she had to leave the school with narcolepsy for a year. Even the Lutheran schooled titled her a 'Called Teacher'.

The debate wasn't if the government could appoint a minister. But if she was a minister or a teacher. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission held that she was a teacher. As did the 6th Circuit Court of appeals. The school argued that she was a minister.

The SCOTUS agreed wit the school on her job definition. And Obama didn't argue this case. The Equal Employment Opportunity Comission did. And EEOC brought the suit under George Bush. And made the same argument before Obama was elected as they did after.

Making your assertion that the EEOC's position reflected Obama's personal views on religion to be laughable nonsense. All of which you'd know if you'd ever read the case.

But you don't, Chic. You simply regurgitate other websites, other arguments. You never actually fact check anything. Which is why you fail.

2. Not a month later, Obama demanded that all employers, no matter religious or not, pay for contraception and abortion-inducing pills for their employees!

Actually, Obama offered a specific religious exemption. And didn't include 'abortion inducing pills'. Worse for your claims, the HHS guidelines came out in August of 2011. 2 months BEFORE the Hossana case was even argued.

Obama Administration Approves Mandated Contraception Coverage Daily News NCRegister.com

You have no idea what you're talking about. You're just mechanically repeating whatever you've been told to think. You've never actually researched any of this, fact checked any of your claims.

And your ignorance is apparent. As you keep making foolish mistakes.

Consider yourself fed.

Try that line when you've actually researched the topic you're attempting to discuss, Parrot.

Research THEN comment. Doing it the other way around leads to embarrassing blunders like the one's you just made.

1. " All nine Supreme Court justices agreed with the decision written by Chief JusticeJohnRobertsthat "theEstablishment Clauseprevents the Government from appointing ministers, and theFree Exercise Clauseprevents it from interfering with the freedom of religious groups to select their own."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosann...ool_v_Equal_Employment_Opportunity_Commission

Again the EEOC's argument wasn't that the government could appoint ministers. But that the woman who was fired wasn't a minister.

But a teacher. You know, the 'teacher' in 'Called Teacher', her official job title at the school?

And its the same argument the EEOC had been making since 2007 when they brought the suit against the Lutheran school. All of which you'd know if you'd bothered to research the case rather than mindlessly apeing what you were told to think:

2. Obama is in charge of HIS EEOC.

The EEOC argument in any given court case doesn't necessarily reflect the president's personal views. You merely assume it does, backed by nothing. And worse, you apply this nonsense inconsistently. As the EEOC argument and suit were brought under GW. Yet you don't claim that the suit reflects his personal opinion on religion.

Demonstrating even you don't believe your bullshit.

Worse still, the EEOC didn't argue what you claimed it did. They didn't argue that the government could appoint ministers. But that the "Called Teacher" was a teacher, not a minister.

You lied about the EEOC's argument. And you were hopelessly ignorant as to the time line of events regarding the birth control mandate, its coverage, or the HHS guidelines. Why?

Say it with me; "You don't actually research jack shit."

You've never read the case. Never read the HHS guidelines. And are mindlessly repeating what you've been told to think by whatever website is doing your thinking for you.

No thank you, Parrot.

See...now you're back to being a liar.

Nah, I'm just vastly more informed that you are, Parrot.

You better start cutting and pasting better than that. As we both know you don't have the knowledge necessary to carry your argument. Whereas I have more than enough to shred your argument. As I just did.

Again.

You can run, but you can't hide.


For further edification.

min·is·ter
(mĭn′ĭ-stər)
n.
1.
a. One who is authorized to perform religious functions in a Christian church,especially a Protestant church.
minister - definition of minister by The Free Dictionary


The Supreme Court understood the term....
Only you and Obama claim not to.

 

[JoeB131]

You can run, but you can't hide.

Actually, Skylar pretty much mopped the floor with your contention that the government was "picking ministers". It's frankly more attention than you deserve.

 

[JakeStarkey]

How true: PC is on the run yet again.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I just don't accept your personal opinion about the religious convictions of a man you don't know, have never met, nor even been in the same room with as amounting to much.

Especially when you're contradicted by the man himself.

Why would I ignore Obama on his own beliefs?

"I just don't accept your personal opinion..."

Thank you for clearing that up....it's stupidity rather than dishonesty.
Slightly better.

So...for edification, I'll provide items found in earlier posts that document Obama's antipathy to religion and the religious freedom of American citizens.


1. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

In the case,Obama's lawyers made the argument that the federal government could force a Lutheran Church to pick as minister, whomever the government decided.

Get that???
Obama claimed the authority to choose a church's ministers.

Hosanna-Tabor was about a teacher who was fired by a Lutheran school in 2005 after she had to leave the school with narcolepsy for a year. Even the Lutheran schooled titled her a 'Called Teacher'.

The debate wasn't if the government could appoint a minister. But if she was a minister or a teacher. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission held that she was a teacher. As did the 6th Circuit Court of appeals. The school argued that she was a minister.

The SCOTUS agreed wit the school on her job definition. And Obama didn't argue this case. The Equal Employment Opportunity Comission did. And EEOC brought the suit under George Bush. And made the same argument before Obama was elected as they did after.

Making your assertion that the EEOC's position reflected Obama's personal views on religion to be laughable nonsense. All of which you'd know if you'd ever read the case.

But you don't, Chic. You simply regurgitate other websites, other arguments. You never actually fact check anything. Which is why you fail.

2. Not a month later, Obama demanded that all employers, no matter religious or not, pay for contraception and abortion-inducing pills for their employees!

Actually, Obama offered a specific religious exemption. And didn't include 'abortion inducing pills'. Worse for your claims, the HHS guidelines came out in August of 2011. 2 months BEFORE the Hossana case was even argued.

Obama Administration Approves Mandated Contraception Coverage Daily News NCRegister.com

You have no idea what you're talking about. You're just mechanically repeating whatever you've been told to think. You've never actually researched any of this, fact checked any of your claims.

And your ignorance is apparent. As you keep making foolish mistakes.

Consider yourself fed.

Try that line when you've actually researched the topic you're attempting to discuss, Parrot.

Research THEN comment. Doing it the other way around leads to embarrassing blunders like the one's you just made.

1. " All nine Supreme Court justices agreed with the decision written by Chief JusticeJohnRobertsthat "theEstablishment Clauseprevents the Government from appointing ministers, and theFree Exercise Clauseprevents it from interfering with the freedom of religious groups to select their own."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosann...ool_v_Equal_Employment_Opportunity_Commission

Again the EEOC's argument wasn't that the government could appoint ministers. But that the woman who was fired wasn't a minister.

But a teacher. You know, the 'teacher' in 'Called Teacher', her official job title at the school?

And its the same argument the EEOC had been making since 2007 when they brought the suit against the Lutheran school. All of which you'd know if you'd bothered to research the case rather than mindlessly apeing what you were told to think:

2. Obama is in charge of HIS EEOC.

The EEOC argument in any given court case doesn't necessarily reflect the president's personal views. You merely assume it does, backed by nothing. And worse, you apply this nonsense inconsistently. As the EEOC argument and suit were brought under GW. Yet you don't claim that the suit reflects his personal opinion on religion.

Demonstrating even you don't believe your bullshit.

Worse still, the EEOC didn't argue what you claimed it did. They didn't argue that the government could appoint ministers. But that the "Called Teacher" was a teacher, not a minister.

You lied about the EEOC's argument. And you were hopelessly ignorant as to the time line of events regarding the birth control mandate, its coverage, or the HHS guidelines. Why?

Say it with me; "You don't actually research jack shit."

You've never read the case. Never read the HHS guidelines. And are mindlessly repeating what you've been told to think by whatever website is doing your thinking for you.

No thank you, Parrot.

See...now you're back to being a liar.

Nah, I'm just vastly more informed that you are, Parrot.

You better start cutting and pasting better than that. As we both know you don't have the knowledge necessary to carry your argument. Whereas I have more than enough to shred your argument. As I just did.

Again.

You can run, but you can't hide.

For further edific

min·is·ter
(mĭn′ĭ-stər)
n.
1.
a. One who is authorized to perform religious functions in a Christian church,especially a Protestant church.
minister - definition of minister by The Free Dictionary

You can run, but you can't hide.

Actually, Skylar pretty much mopped the floor with your contention that the government was "picking ministers". It's frankly more attention than you deserve.

Here's your morning dose of truth, as well:


min·is·ter
(mĭn′ĭ-stər)
n.
1.
a. One who is authorized to perform religious functions in a Christian church,especially a Protestant church.
minister - definition of minister by The Free Dictionary


The Supreme Court understood the term....
Only you and Obama claim not to.

 

[JoeB131]

This woman was a teacher, and it was the Bush EEOC that brought the lawsuit, not Obama.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And PC's latest cut and paste has nothing to do with the point.

Obama does not hate religion, but PC does hate her fellow man.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even Catholics don't know how to be Catholic, it is very evident.....The whole shebang is a cluster fuck of deceit and greed.....

"Even Catholics don't know how to be Catholic,..."

Well, then....you must be pleased that Barack Obama is available to teach 'em the correct way....


...just as he has led the way in improving race relations, huh?

The race relations are about par for the course, and Catholics need to be told since it is a passive/aggressive religion...

"CBS News/New York Times Poll: Race Relations Worst In Over 2 Decades
NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — A new poll released Monday indicated that Americans believe race relations are at their worst in more than two decades.

The CBS News/New York Times poll said 61 percent of Americans characterize race relations in the U.S. as “bad,” including a majority of white and black respondents. The figure is the highest since 1992."
Race Relations Worst In Over 20 Years CBS News N.Y. Times Poll Says CBS New York



Let's never forget the fools who put this incompetent ideologue in power.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This woman was a teacher, and it was the Bush EEOC that brought the lawsuit, not Obama.

So?????

Bush brought the charges against the New Black Panther, and Obama dismissed them.

Are you playing dumb....or really stupid???



Obama pursued attempts to force religious institutions to hire who the federal government chose.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And PC's latest cut and paste has nothing to do with the point.

Obama does not hate religion, but PC does hate her fellow man.

Hey....look who's here!

The eighth dwarf, 'Fakey.'

 

[PoliticalChic]

This woman was a teacher, and it was the Bush EEOC that brought the lawsuit, not Obama.

Minister.

Here job was to teach religion.

Obama pursed the case....not Bush.

 

[JoeB131]

So?????

Bush brought the charges against the New Black Panther, and Obama dismissed them.

Are you playing dumb....or really stupid???



Obama pursued attempts to force religious institutions to hire who the federal government chose.

Yeah, because the Black Panthers didn't actually break any federal laws. But don't let that stop you, Faux News said the five minutes before the cops ran them off intimidated a bunch of people in this 99% black neighborhood from voting for McCain and Palin.

 

[JoeB131]

This woman was a teacher, and it was the Bush EEOC that brought the lawsuit, not Obama.

Minister.

Here job was to teach religion.

Obama pursed the case....not Bush.

You mean they had years to do the right thing, and they didn't?

Shame on them.

 

[HenryBHough]

A lot of fuss over the one line carved into the great stone tablet by the entrance to the (former) White House:

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me"

This commandment establishes the exclusive nature of the relationship between the nation of America and its national God, Barack, the god of all Democratkind; a covenant initiated by Him after delivering the Americans from slavery through the plagues of Booshh and The Clintons.

In a general sense, idolatry is the paying of divine honor to any created thing. In recent times, opportunities to participate in the honor or worship of other deities abounded. However, according to the Book of Barack, Americans are strictly warned to neither adopt nor adapt any of the religious practices of the peoples around them. Nevertheless, the story of the people of America until the Booshh Captivity is the story of the violation of the sole commandment by the worship of “foreign gods” and its consequences. The election of 2008 seems to have been a turning point after which the American people as a whole were ordered to become strongly monotheistic and willing to fight battles and face martyrdom before paying homage to any other god.