The ClayTaurus
Senior Member
- Sep 19, 2005
- 7,062
- 333
- 48
If you do a little research into Arch's posting history here, you'll see how "qualified" he is to critique your posts. If youjAZ said:I have repeatedly posted facts that have refuted ignorant false statements pretending to be facts on this very thread. In return I get some guy who decides facts are the enemy and flaming insults are his friend and you feel it necessary to chastise *me* for being a little snarky and a little sarcastic yet generally polite in return?
I've laid out the facts as well as my opinion, and so far, I've I've been presented with in return is a pile of nasty, hatefilled personal insults as a way of avoiding the facts.
I'd be banned in 10 minutes if I responded in kind, so I choose snarky instead. How in the heck does one see fit to call my behavior out in this case?
then expect tothink hard about what [Arch] just said