OK Scientists. Explain How Global Warming Is Causing Snowy/Blizzard Conditions In Northern States.

Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow

Of course not. See, there's your problem. You're just brainlessly parroting the fabricated stories that your masters told you to repeat.

Now, people of normal intelligence understand that snow in late November is common in the northern USA, and thus they laugh at anyone bleating the standard "Look! A snowflake! Global warming is a hoax!" denier cult mantra.

You can't have snow if we are in global warming. Your "science" is bogus. Have a seat with the Flat Earthers.

Huh? Is this serious?
 
Oh look another thread full of in-breds who don't understand the difference between climate and weather.
 
You can't have snow if we are in global warming. Your "science" is bogus. Seat a seat with the Flat Earthers.
You can't have snow if we are in global warming? Huh? Is that a new "scientific rule"?
The denialists know they've already lost the scientific debate. Their only recourse is to use ridicule to try and enlist those even dumber than they are. It's all political on their side and one of their main tricks is to deflect the debate by accusing the AGW side of political motives.

Only a moron believes in AGW.... right down there with flat Earth and alchemy.

:lol::lol::lol:
 
You can't have snow if we are in global warming. Your "science" is bogus. Seat a seat with the Flat Earthers.
You can't have snow if we are in global warming? Huh? Is that a new "scientific rule"?
The denialists know they've already lost the scientific debate. Their only recourse is to use ridicule to try and enlist those even dumber than they are. It's all political on their side and one of their main tricks is to deflect the debate by accusing the AGW side of political motives.

Only a moron believes in AGW.... right down there with flat Earth and alchemy.

:lol::lol::lol:

Who do you consider an expert in the field of climatology?

99% chance you don't give an answer or tell me who you don't consider to be an expert.
 
You know what's hilariously funny? Glaciers give us a record over time of when the glaciers were created and the atmosphere at the time from gas bubbles trapped within the glaciers. You can actually follow the make up of the atmosphere over the life if the glacier. It's not like scientists are guessing. They can actually go out and take measurements. But then Right wingers have a book too. It may be only one book, but it has everything they are interested in knowing.

And they don't even follow the only book they have.
 
Climate change! Numbskull


:disagree::hellno: Well, so what is Happening in South Dakota, Iowa, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan and Indiana today is a result of Global Warming? Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow and our children living on the coastlines would be dealing with flooding all the time being the north pole has melted?
It's only November 22, but it looks more like a typical January in the rust belt. Well, there u go. Lets hear your "Global Warming Explanations"
:lalala::oops-28:
 
After the Right changes their words.

You mean like that reporter tried to do to Donald Trump?

there is a lot of it in lefty media

look how they altered zimmermans 9-1-1- call
BS, dupe.

you fell for msnbc editing trickery

so if anything you are the dupe dumbass
 
thanks

hold the leftards to their words
After the Right changes their words.

You mean like that reporter tried to do to Donald Trump?

there is a lot of it in lefty media

look how they altered zimmermans 9-1-1- call
BS, dupe.

you fell for msnbc editing trickery

so if anything you are the dupe dumbass
One example, while Fox Rush etc never stop, dupe of greedy idiot billionaires...
 
People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-five years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-five years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-FIVE YEARS. And not a single actual proof than man had anything to do with climate change. Or can do anything to change it back.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.
 
i wonder if turkey brain liberals know the actual meaning of "Warming". to them, Global warming only happens in july and august when the north pole melts, then come October/November when the average temp in the northern hemosphire isnt 85 degrees,,,,they remain silent till May.
 
You know what's hilariously funny? Glaciers give us a record over time of when the glaciers were created and the atmosphere at the time from gas bubbles trapped within the glaciers. You can actually follow the make up of the atmosphere over the life if the glacier. It's not like scientists are guessing. They can actually go out and take measurements. But then Right wingers have a book too. It may be only one book, but it has everything they are interested in knowing.

And they don't even follow the only book they have.

The glacial record shows that the increase in CO2 followed the increase in temperature, not the other way around.

Do you AGW numskulls know anything about the evidence?
 
You know what's hilariously funny? Glaciers give us a record over time of when the glaciers were created and the atmosphere at the time from gas bubbles trapped within the glaciers. You can actually follow the make up of the atmosphere over the life if the glacier. It's not like scientists are guessing. They can actually go out and take measurements. But then Right wingers have a book too. It may be only one book, but it has everything they are interested in knowing.

And they don't even follow the only book they have.

The glacial record shows that the increase in CO2 followed the increase in temperature, not the other way around.

Do you AGW numskulls know anything about the evidence?
i wonder if all of these 97% dufass scientists and al gore know how many nuclear bombs it would take to melt the north pole.
 
After the Right changes their words.

You mean like that reporter tried to do to Donald Trump?

there is a lot of it in lefty media

look how they altered zimmermans 9-1-1- call
BS, dupe.

you fell for msnbc editing trickery

so if anything you are the dupe dumbass
One example, while Fox Rush etc never stop, dupe of greedy idiot billionaires...
you dont even make sense dimwit
 

Forum List

Back
Top