oh boo hoo Rand Paul shushed a reporter

In yet more evidence that Cruz is a shill...it comes out that his major sugar-daddy is a Roger(?) Mercer of the Renaissance hedge fund. The founder is known for his donations to the Democrats. Mercer is also apparently a gambler well versed in bluffery.
He should only get money from jew hating groups right m

WTF are you talking about, take your pathetic attempts at a smear elsewhere
 
its not a myth, its a proven fact.


Of course it is a proven fact, The right always whines about the "liberal media" myth. It's their "GO TO" whine.


Are you really going to sit there on your fat ass and claim that the media did not support obama and will not support HRC?


The media doesn't support the Democrats any more than a sports commentator reporting a touchdown is supporting that team, or is opposing the other team. If it was a GOP vs DNC football game, you would whine if the commentator mentioned anything other than bad plays for the DNC.


media bias has been documented in many valid studies. If you choose to pretend that it doesn't exist there is nothing I can say except you are living in a fantasy world.


All credible studies of media bias put fox at the top of the list. Far above any of the others.

Not true, MSNBC was at the top, then FOXNews.
 
Of course it is a proven fact, The right always whines about the "liberal media" myth. It's their "GO TO" whine.


Are you really going to sit there on your fat ass and claim that the media did not support obama and will not support HRC?


The media doesn't support the Democrats any more than a sports commentator reporting a touchdown is supporting that team, or is opposing the other team. If it was a GOP vs DNC football game, you would whine if the commentator mentioned anything other than bad plays for the DNC.


media bias has been documented in many valid studies. If you choose to pretend that it doesn't exist there is nothing I can say except you are living in a fantasy world.


All credible studies of media bias put fox at the top of the list. Far above any of the others.

Not true, MSNBC was at the top, then FOXNews.


I don't think so, but even if it was, did you expect me to defend them? The right wing is the only one to tie it's feelings of self worth to any TV station's ratings.
 
Are you really going to sit there on your fat ass and claim that the media did not support obama and will not support HRC?


The media doesn't support the Democrats any more than a sports commentator reporting a touchdown is supporting that team, or is opposing the other team. If it was a GOP vs DNC football game, you would whine if the commentator mentioned anything other than bad plays for the DNC.


media bias has been documented in many valid studies. If you choose to pretend that it doesn't exist there is nothing I can say except you are living in a fantasy world.


All credible studies of media bias put fox at the top of the list. Far above any of the others.

Not true, MSNBC was at the top, then FOXNews.


I don't think so, but even if it was, did you expect me to defend them? The right wing is the only one to tie it's feelings of self worth to any TV station's ratings.

I don't care for any of the network news. I prefer reading many sources.
 
its not a myth, its a proven fact.


Of course it is a proven fact, The right always whines about the "liberal media" myth. It's their "GO TO" whine.


Are you really going to sit there on your fat ass and claim that the media did not support obama and will not support HRC?


The media doesn't support the Democrats any more than a sports commentator reporting a touchdown is supporting that team, or is opposing the other team. If it was a GOP vs DNC football game, you would whine if the commentator mentioned anything other than bad plays for the DNC.


media bias has been documented in many valid studies. If you choose to pretend that it doesn't exist there is nothing I can say except you are living in a fantasy world.


All credible studies of media bias put fox at the top of the list. Far above any of the others.

Now... consider the value of the assessment "Credible" where such is advanced by a Relativist.


(Reader, Relativism is the doctrine which holds that knowledge, truth, and morality exist only in relation to one's cultural, societal, historical and personal context, and, as such can never be the result of soundly reasoned absolutes.

It is through this, perversion of reason, wherein relativism axiomatically rejects the objectivity that is essential to truth.

As a result, words which rest in truth, such a 'credible' are MEANINGLESS... where they are advanced by those who reject the very premise on which the concept itself, rests.)
 
He should have pulled a Hillary, claim he is a victim of a vast left wing conspiracy, then lie.

Other than that, who cares how he treats the press, can't be any worse than the current administration.

Yeah, guy, you go with that.

I hope obama is paying you for all that space he occupies in your head.

Who gives a shit how Paul or anyone else treats the press? Obama dictates what questions are to be asked and answered, if you piss him off he doesn't acknowledge you, he is no different than any other President.

The press is a bunch of vultures wanting to dig up dirt and stir up crap, that is what they are about, I don't care any candidate, no matter what party, they can tell them off. No big deal. The only people pissed is the lefty nutters that think the press is noble.
 
He should have pulled a Hillary, claim he is a victim of a vast left wing conspiracy, then lie.

Other than that, who cares how he treats the press, can't be any worse than the current administration.

Yeah, guy, you go with that.

I hope obama is paying you for all that space he occupies in your head.

Who gives a shit how Paul or anyone else treats the press? Obama dictates what questions are to be asked and answered, if you piss him off he doesn't acknowledge you, he is no different than any other President.

The press is a bunch of vultures wanting to dig up dirt and stir up crap, that is what they are about, I don't care any candidate, no matter what party, they can tell them off. No big deal. The only people pissed is the lefty nutters that think the press is noble.


much truth to that, but it is also true that the majority of the media lean left and ask softball questions to their left wing candidates.
 
He should have pulled a Hillary, claim he is a victim of a vast left wing conspiracy, then lie.

Other than that, who cares how he treats the press, can't be any worse than the current administration.

Yeah, guy, you go with that.

I hope obama is paying you for all that space he occupies in your head.

Who gives a shit how Paul or anyone else treats the press? Obama dictates what questions are to be asked and answered, if you piss him off he doesn't acknowledge you, he is no different than any other President.

The press is a bunch of vultures wanting to dig up dirt and stir up crap, that is what they are about, I don't care any candidate, no matter what party, they can tell them off. No big deal. The only people pissed is the lefty nutters that think the press is noble.


much truth to that, but it is also true that the majority of the media lean left and ask softball questions to their left wing candidates.
That because the Democrats cry when they get tough questions about substance and tested on their bogus theories.
 
He should have pulled a Hillary, claim he is a victim of a vast left wing conspiracy, then lie.

Other than that, who cares how he treats the press, can't be any worse than the current administration.

Yeah, guy, you go with that.

I hope obama is paying you for all that space he occupies in your head.

Who gives a shit how Paul or anyone else treats the press? Obama dictates what questions are to be asked and answered, if you piss him off he doesn't acknowledge you, he is no different than any other President.

The press is a bunch of vultures wanting to dig up dirt and stir up crap, that is what they are about, I don't care any candidate, no matter what party, they can tell them off. No big deal. The only people pissed is the lefty nutters that think the press is noble.


much truth to that, but it is also true that the majority of the media lean left and ask softball questions to their left wing candidates.
That because the Democrats cry when they get tough questions about substance and tested on their bogus theories.


and why Hillary will dodge any venue where she might get some real questions.
 
He should have pulled a Hillary, claim he is a victim of a vast left wing conspiracy, then lie.

Other than that, who cares how he treats the press, can't be any worse than the current administration.

Yeah, guy, you go with that.

I hope obama is paying you for all that space he occupies in your head.

Who gives a shit how Paul or anyone else treats the press? Obama dictates what questions are to be asked and answered, if you piss him off he doesn't acknowledge you, he is no different than any other President.

The press is a bunch of vultures wanting to dig up dirt and stir up crap, that is what they are about, I don't care any candidate, no matter what party, they can tell them off. No big deal. The only people pissed is the lefty nutters that think the press is noble.


much truth to that, but it is also true that the majority of the media lean left and ask softball questions to their left wing candidates.
That because the Democrats cry when they get tough questions about substance and tested on their bogus theories.


and why Hillary will dodge any venue where she might get some real questions.

Right...that's why she's choosing small gatherings and venues not large stadium events.
 
The Paul worshipers are now coming back out of the basmemts with the single minded purpose of purging all non believers. It it worse than Obama zombies
 
Saw about a 30 minute earnest discussion on fox the other night about Rand Paul shushing reporters.
Saw it mentioned on PBS news hour too.

How pathetic of these self-absorbed damn reporters... DO your damn job and tell us some real news or STFU

Who was that bastard pointing a gun to your head and forcing you to watch these programs?
 
Saw about a 30 minute earnest discussion on fox the other night about Rand Paul shushing reporters.
Saw it mentioned on PBS news hour too.

How pathetic of these self-absorbed damn reporters... DO your damn job and tell us some real news or STFU

Who was that bastard pointing a gun to your head and forcing you to watch these programs?

I was enthralled by the idiocy. Kind of like watching the stooges
 
Saw about a 30 minute earnest discussion on fox the other night about Rand Paul shushing reporters.
Saw it mentioned on PBS news hour too.

How pathetic of these self-absorbed damn reporters... DO your damn job and tell us some real news or STFU

Who was that bastard pointing a gun to your head and forcing you to watch these programs?

I was enthralled by the idiocy. Kind of like watching the stooges

So, you got exactly what you wanted, and now you're complaining about getting it.
 
Saw about a 30 minute earnest discussion on fox the other night about Rand Paul shushing reporters.
Saw it mentioned on PBS news hour too.

How pathetic of these self-absorbed damn reporters... DO your damn job and tell us some real news or STFU

Who was that bastard pointing a gun to your head and forcing you to watch these programs?

I was enthralled by the idiocy. Kind of like watching the stooges

So, you got exactly what you wanted, and now you're complaining about getting it.

well I tuned in for info, current debate....I got useless entertainment
 
The Paul worshipers are now coming back out of the basmemts with the single minded purpose of purging all non believers. It it worse than Obama zombies


what exactly is wrong with supporting the candidate they believe in? Isn't that how this is supposed to work?
Nothing. But blind worship and fanaticism is sick


yes it is. are you saying that all Paul supporters are engaging in that? If so, you are FOS.
 
Who gives a shit how Paul or anyone else treats the press? Obama dictates what questions are to be asked and answered, if you piss him off he doesn't acknowledge you, he is no different than any other President.

There's a difference between how a president conducts himself and how a candidate should conduct himself. Obama really isn't any different than his predecessors.

A candidate, on the other hand, is asking us for his support. He's trying to convince us that he's worthy of the job. And refusing to answer questions or being rude to the press, he's kind of being rude to us.

The press is a bunch of vultures wanting to dig up dirt and stir up crap, that is what they are about, I don't care any candidate, no matter what party, they can tell them off. No big deal. The only people pissed is the lefty nutters that think the press is noble.

Meh, If Crazy Rand can't handle the Bubble Headed Bleach Blonde who comes on at 5, he can't handle Putin and the Crazy Ayatollahs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top