Official Who Ignored Request for Water During Maui Inferno: 'Water Requires Conversations Around Equity'

Global warming isn't "causing everything".

:auiqs.jpg:
Sure it isn't. :rolleyes:



6qhb3f.jpg



Climate change makes for shorter winters

Climate change makes for harsher winters

Climate change means less snow
669536


Climate change means more snow

Climate change causes droughts in California

Climate change causes floods in Texas and Oklahoma

Climate change makes wet places wetter and dry places drier...

...except when it makes wet places dryer...

Unusual Drought in Thailand Makes High Vulnerability to Climate Change Evident​


...and dry places wetter

Climate change causes more hurricanes

Hurricanes Have Doubled Due to Global Warming, Study Says​


Climate change causes less hurricanes

Climate change causes more rain (but less water)

Climate change causes less rain

Climate change decreases the spread of malaria

Climate change increases the spread of malaria

Climate change makes San Francisco foggier

Climate change makes San Francisco less foggy

Climate change causes duller autumn leaves

Climate changes causes more colourful autumn leaves

Climate change makes for less salty seas

Climate change makes for saltier seas

Climate change causes Antarctica to lose land ice

Climate change causes Antarctica to gain land ice

Climate change makes the earth hotter...

...unless the earth isn't getting hotter...

...in which case climate change can explain that, too.

Science as Falsification​

The following excerpt was originally published in Conjectures and Refutations (1963).

by Karl R. Popper​


" . . . . These considerations led me in the winter of 1919-20 to conclusions which I may now reformulate as follows.
  1. It is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory — if we look for confirmations.
  2. Confirmations should count only if they are the result of risky predictions; that is to say, if, unenlightened by the theory in question, we should have expected an event which was incompatible with the theory — an event which would have refuted the theory.
  3. Every "good" scientific theory is a prohibition: it forbids certain things to happen. The more a theory forbids, the better it is.
  4. A theory which is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific. Irrefutability is not a virtue of a theory (as people often think) but a vice.
  5. Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or to refute it. Testability is falsifiability; but there are degrees of testability: some theories are more testable, more exposed to refutation, than others; they take, as it were, greater risks.
  6. Confirming evidence should not count except when it is the result of a genuine test of the theory; and this means that it can be presented as a serious but unsuccessful attempt to falsify the theory. (I now speak in such cases of "corroborating evidence.")
  7. Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers — for example by introducing ad hoc some auxiliary assumption, or by reinterpreting the theory ad hoc in such a way that it escapes refutation. Such a procedure is always possible, but it rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status. (I later described such a rescuing operation as a "conventionalist twist" or a "conventionalist stratagem.")

One can sum up all this by saying that the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability. . . . "

"Karl Popper famously said, "A theory that explains everything explains nothing." So what do you make of the theory that catastrophic manmade CO2-driven "climate change" can account for harsher winters and lighter winters, more snow and less snow, droughts and floods, more hurricanes and less hurricanes, more rain and less rain, more malaria and less malaria, saltier seas and less salty seas, Antarctica ice melting and Antarctic ice gaining and dozens of other contradictions? Popper gave a name to "theories" like this: pseudoscience."

Climate Change is Unfalsifiable Woo-Woo Pseudoscience​



 
Something ain't right about the Hawaii fire. These people live over a lava flow 24/7 and something is always erupting somewhere in Hawaii. Wouldn't you think they would be prepared for fire with seawater pumps? They still haven't figured out how it started?
 
Something ain't right about the Hawaii fire. These people live over a lava flow 24/7 and something is always erupting somewhere in Hawaii. Wouldn't you think they would be prepared for fire with seawater pumps? They still haven't figured out how it started?

I don't think Maui has an active volcano, it's one of the older islands.

Correction, it's considered active, but hasn't erupted in centuries.
 
:auiqs.jpg:
Sure it isn't. :rolleyes:



6qhb3f.jpg



Climate change makes for shorter winters

Climate change makes for harsher winters

Climate change means less snow
669536


Climate change means more snow

Climate change causes droughts in California

Climate change causes floods in Texas and Oklahoma

Climate change makes wet places wetter and dry places drier...

...except when it makes wet places dryer...

Unusual Drought in Thailand Makes High Vulnerability to Climate Change Evident​


...and dry places wetter

Climate change causes more hurricanes

Hurricanes Have Doubled Due to Global Warming, Study Says​


Climate change causes less hurricanes

Climate change causes more rain (but less water)

Climate change causes less rain

Climate change decreases the spread of malaria

Climate change increases the spread of malaria

Climate change makes San Francisco foggier

Climate change makes San Francisco less foggy

Climate change causes duller autumn leaves

Climate changes causes more colourful autumn leaves

Climate change makes for less salty seas

Climate change makes for saltier seas

Climate change causes Antarctica to lose land ice

Climate change causes Antarctica to gain land ice

Climate change makes the earth hotter...

...unless the earth isn't getting hotter...

...in which case climate change can explain that, too.

Science as Falsification​

The following excerpt was originally published in Conjectures and Refutations (1963).

by Karl R. Popper​


" . . . . These considerations led me in the winter of 1919-20 to conclusions which I may now reformulate as follows.
  1. It is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory — if we look for confirmations.
  2. Confirmations should count only if they are the result of risky predictions; that is to say, if, unenlightened by the theory in question, we should have expected an event which was incompatible with the theory — an event which would have refuted the theory.
  3. Every "good" scientific theory is a prohibition: it forbids certain things to happen. The more a theory forbids, the better it is.
  4. A theory which is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific. Irrefutability is not a virtue of a theory (as people often think) but a vice.
  5. Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or to refute it. Testability is falsifiability; but there are degrees of testability: some theories are more testable, more exposed to refutation, than others; they take, as it were, greater risks.
  6. Confirming evidence should not count except when it is the result of a genuine test of the theory; and this means that it can be presented as a serious but unsuccessful attempt to falsify the theory. (I now speak in such cases of "corroborating evidence.")
  7. Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers — for example by introducing ad hoc some auxiliary assumption, or by reinterpreting the theory ad hoc in such a way that it escapes refutation. Such a procedure is always possible, but it rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status. (I later described such a rescuing operation as a "conventionalist twist" or a "conventionalist stratagem.")

One can sum up all this by saying that the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability. . . . "

"Karl Popper famously said, "A theory that explains everything explains nothing." So what do you make of the theory that catastrophic manmade CO2-driven "climate change" can account for harsher winters and lighter winters, more snow and less snow, droughts and floods, more hurricanes and less hurricanes, more rain and less rain, more malaria and less malaria, saltier seas and less salty seas, Antarctica ice melting and Antarctic ice gaining and dozens of other contradictions? Popper gave a name to "theories" like this: pseudoscience."

Climate Change is Unfalsifiable Woo-Woo Pseudoscience​






You really are too stupid to be one person. Everything that you've put in you post, whether the posts are true or not, are climate related.

Once again, you seem to lack the intellectual capacity to understand the climate change is destroying the world. Yes, hotter weather causes more spread of hot weather diseases. And yes, it will is the greatest catastrophe the world has seen.

Yes climate change results in droughts, crop failures and famines.

Yes, climate change results in some areas getting colder, and some hotter, and some drier and some wetter.

How stupid are YOU that you can't comprehend these facts???
 
Mother nature is a bitch. Liberal policies kill.
Read MisterBeale's post #25.

Mother nature only allows it to rain 4-6 days/year on Maui. Having enough fresh water for the inhabitants has always been a battle.

I'm surprised that they don't have large, high capacity pumps, in the ocean for fire fighting.
 
You really are too stupid to be one person. Everything that you've put in you post, whether the posts are true or not, are climate related.

Once again, you seem to lack the intellectual capacity to understand the climate change is destroying the world. Yes, hotter weather causes more spread of hot weather diseases. And yes, it will is the greatest catastrophe the world has seen.

Yes climate change results in droughts, crop failures and famines.

Yes, climate change results in some areas getting colder, and some hotter, and some drier and some wetter.

How stupid are YOU that you can't comprehend these facts???

Rube.
 
Where is the poking fun?

Was it poking fun when the left went after Flynt, MI republicans for their role in it. Why the fuck would you cover for a clear monumental fuckup that was 100 times worse than Flynt?

Team over - everything else.
 
Leftism on full display. Hawaiians get everything they deserve for voting Democrat on everything.
Only God knows how many were burned alive because of his wokeness.

During the inferno that devastated part of the island of Maui, wiping entire towns off the map and possibly killing more than a thousand people (once a full assessment can be made), people on Maui begged state officials to allow West Maui stream water to be diverted to fill up reservoirs for firefighting. That request went to M. Kaleo Manuel, Deputy Director of Hawaii's Commission on Water Resource Management, and he delayed approval of that water for five hours - five hours in which the once-contained fire exploded. By the time the approval was received, workers were unable to reach the siphon release so that the water could be diverted. Now we're learning that Manuel, an Obama Foundation Leader for the Asia Pacific Region, is a climate change activist and DEI devotee who's said, "Like, we can share [water], but it requires true conversations about equity."


More human sacrifices to the death cult of leftism.
 
Yeah but fire standards should be universal in the state of Hawaii.

A forest fire and a lava flow are two different things, despite both being hot and dangerous.

Especially in Hawaii where the flows are usually pretty predictable once outside the lava fields.
 

I have never, in all my time discussing with folks that believe in AGW, how this hypothesis, which demonizes the very breath of humanity, would be falsified.

They can't think of a way it could be.

At this point? It is as much an act of faith, as any of the world's major religions.

Most of them know who their patron saint, Maurice Strong is. :71:
When backed into a corner, yes, they finally admit, this is all about politics, and complete control of all of humanity.
 
I have never, in all my time discussing with folks that believe in AGW, how this hypothesis, which demonizes the very breath of humanity, would be falsified.

They can't think of a way it could be.

At this point? It is as much an act of faith, as any of the world's major religions.

Most of them know who their patron saint, Maurice Strong is. :71:
When backed into a corner, yes, they finally admit, this is all about politics, and complete control of all of humanity.

You can tell because their only solution is more government and lower standards of living.
 
Why haven't YOU addressed my post which pointed out the the first world off-shored their manufacturing to Asia to skirt first world pollution intiatives, and that Americans actively fought against these countries passing ANY environment regulations, which would increase their costs????

The first world has been offloading their pollution and their garbage to desperate third world countries for generations, and now you're blaming these people for polluting.

Why don't you try facts, Asshole:





China puts out more CO2 than all developed nations combined, and no shock you’re defending the ChiComs.

BTW - under Trump the US lowered its CO2 and was the ONLY nation to meet the Paris Accord targets.
 

Forum List

Back
Top