No support for their claim that Trump was pro-Russia?We already know this Ukraine election meddling has been debunked.He had every right to hold up aid if the reason was to investigate or find out if Ukraine interfered in the 2016 elections, and if the Bidens were involved in that corruption over time as well. Not doing these things if have suspicion's of, would constitute a dereliction of duty.In a Friday interview on "Fox & Friends," President Donald Trump admitted to holding up military aid to pressure Ukraine's government to investigate a baseless conspiracy theory that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 US election.Admitted by who?
In other words, he acknowledged doing the very thing he could be impeached for and has repeatedly denied.
Here's the interview. Portions relevant to this article start around the 5:50 mark.
But Putin thanks you for it.
Debunked? LOL
Ukraine placed bet on Hillary, and worked against Trump.
Here is Financial Times article from 2016. They proclaimed that Trump is "pro-Russian" without anything to support it and supported Hillary who was "pro-Ukrainian", because Barry send them blankets and MREs.
Ukraine’s leaders campaign against ‘pro-Putin’ Trump
Mr Leshchenko and Ukraine’s anti-corruption bureau published a secret ledger this month that authorities claim show millions of dollars of off-the-book cash payments to Paul Manafort, Mr Trump’s campaign director, while he was advising Mr Yanukovich’s Regions party from 2005.
Okay, Never mind his statement that he would consider recognizing Crimea as Russian territory and lifting the sanctions against Russia if he were elected.
It's all moot now anyway. Trump is clearly all the way up inside Putin's Russian ass.
It would be nice if you link to what you just claimed.
His actions towards Russia and Ukraine certainly do not support your claims.