Occupy people and anti-semitism

What is troubeling is that his fellow loonies there didn't condemn them. They let him rant on. Not one condemned him or tried to stop them.

That means they gave him tacit consent to speak for them.


A new video posted to YouTube shows the protester loudly and aggressively proclaiming “the Jews control Wall Street.”

In the nearly 6-minute video, the man is seen standing in Zuccotti Park ranting against Israel and Jews while holding a sign reading “Hitler’s Bankers – Wall St.”

Liberals are so dumb


Occupy Wall Street Freedom of expression - YouTube
Because they didn't try to deny him his 1st Amendment right to free speech, while they are trying to exercise their 1st Amendment right to peaceful protest?


lame.gif
 
It was their rally. They control who is in it.

He was spewing his hateful, racist, anti-semitic, comments, and his fellow crazies were just just doing their own cheers right next to him.

What is troubeling is that his fellow loonies there didn't condemn them. They let him rant on. Not one condemned him or tried to stop them.

That means they gave him tacit consent to speak for them.


A new video posted to YouTube shows the protester loudly and aggressively proclaiming “the Jews control Wall Street.”

In the nearly 6-minute video, the man is seen standing in Zuccotti Park ranting against Israel and Jews while holding a sign reading “Hitler’s Bankers – Wall St.”

Liberals are so dumb


Occupy Wall Street Freedom of expression - YouTube
Because they didn't try to deny him his 1st Amendment right to free speech, while they are trying to exercise their 1st Amendment right to peaceful protest?


lame.gif
 
It was their rally. They control who is in it.

He was spewing his hateful, racist, anti-semitic, comments, and his fellow crazies were just just doing their own cheers right next to him.

What is troubeling is that his fellow loonies there didn't condemn them. They let him rant on. Not one condemned him or tried to stop them.

That means they gave him tacit consent to speak for them.
Because they didn't try to deny him his 1st Amendment right to free speech, while they are trying to exercise their 1st Amendment right to peaceful protest?


lame.gif

Now imagine if he was a white guy up there yelling how the ******* are all sucking the system dry etc etc, do you think the cops would stand by and let him exercise his 1A rights? Or would they (correctly) haul him for incitement?
This looks like incitement to me, and not protected speech.
 
It was their rally. They control who is in it.

He was spewing his hateful, racist, anti-semitic, comments, and his fellow crazies were just just doing their own cheers right next to him.

What is troubeling is that his fellow loonies there didn't condemn them. They let him rant on. Not one condemned him or tried to stop them.

That means they gave him tacit consent to speak for them.
Because they didn't try to deny him his 1st Amendment right to free speech, while they are trying to exercise their 1st Amendment right to peaceful protest?


lame.gif
Who is "they"?

And using this logic, why didn't the teabaggers shut up all the people who were comparing Obama to Hitler at their rallies?

Why didn't they chase the people with the racist signs out of their rallies?

They must have given those people their 'tacit consent', right?
 
Last edited:
It was their rally. They control who is in it.

He was spewing his hateful, racist, anti-semitic, comments, and his fellow crazies were just just doing their own cheers right next to him.

What is troubeling is that his fellow loonies there didn't condemn them. They let him rant on. Not one condemned him or tried to stop them.

That means they gave him tacit consent to speak for them.
Because they didn't try to deny him his 1st Amendment right to free speech, while they are trying to exercise their 1st Amendment right to peaceful protest?


lame.gif

No according to some liberals fisters

They were just mentioning the bankers were Jewish
:eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top