Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Glad you've calmed down, you little shit. Those anger managment classes must work after all.
Who needs standards? Somebody is sure to be offended by them. Standards, I mean. Any standards, like ones you don't hold. Gays are like blacks are like Illegal aliens are like...fill in the blank, then anyone can say they are like whatever and then they can do whatever the bloody hell they choose, and laws are restrictions and are discriminatory. Sorry, I am not GAY. Sorry. It's all my fault. I'm sorry I'm a Anglo-Saxon and not a illegal alien, either. Sorry I am not gay. Gays and blacks and illegal aliens ALL the have the same rights (GASP) EVERYONE else does. Ya know that , RAVI. The fact they wish to do ANYTHING and then parade around as a victim is outrageous. NOBODY can do ANYTHING they freekin' want, whenever they want, and claim it is a right or they are victims or pretend all things are the same. It insults the rest of us. Hell , If a bunch of gay polygamist cannibals " IMMIGRATED" illegally from New Guinea , I suppose that would be defensible one way or the other, too.
Having sex with animals isn't violating anyone else's rights. Unless of course, the animals belong to someone else....
Could be a great way to "prove" macroevolution.
Cause animals can consent to sex?
Who needs standards? Somebody is sure to be offended by them. Standards, I mean. Any standards, like ones you don't hold. Gays are like blacks are like Illegal aliens are like...fill in the blank, then anyone can say they are like whatever and then they can do whatever the bloody hell they choose, and laws are restrictions and are discriminatory. Sorry, I am not GAY. Sorry. It's all my fault. I'm sorry I'm a Anglo-Saxon and not a illegal alien, either. Sorry I am not gay. Gays and blacks and illegal aliens ALL the have the same rights (GASP) EVERYONE else does. Ya know that , RAVI. The fact they wish to do ANYTHING and then parade around as a victim is outrageous. NOBODY can do ANYTHING they freekin' want, whenever they want, and claim it is a right or they are victims or pretend all things are the same. It insults the rest of us. Hell , If a bunch of gay polygamist cannibals " IMMIGRATED" illegally from New Guinea , I suppose that would be defensible one way or the other, too.
I am totally in favor of intelligence standards for people in order to post here, for the record. Please don't ever say I don't have any standards.
Well you have to question the intelligence of anyone who tries to debate politics on the internet, so if they try to implement standards either no one would be here or the standards would have to be so low as to be essentially non-existant.
Having sex with animals isn't violating anyone else's rights. Unless of course, the animals belong to someone else....
Could be a great way to "prove" macroevolution.
Cause animals can consent to sex?
Huh... So where 'science' could show that animals can consent to sexual intercourse... you'd be fine with that?
And that question goes to the others who adhered to the position that the sexual orientation of beastiality is lacks the legitimacy of the homo-sexual orientation because animals can't give their verbal consent...
Which of course goes to the same question regarding children.
The APA has issued a 'SCIENTIFIC study' which concludes that children who consent to sexual relationships with adults actually benefit from the experience and that children who are known to have been molested as children do not suffer long term psychological injury...
Do you believe that where 'science' can show that a child is able to give their consent, that an adult who engages in sexual activity with such a child are within their RIGHTS and should not be condemned of suffer any consequences as a result of that decision?
Fathertime: I hate that kind of crap, make a clear post or blow me off. "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Ignoring it doesn't make a hell of a lot of sense, either. I said one thing loud and clear : We ALL have the same rights". Enumerations are irrelevant. Just the facts, ma'am. Is there a way to get that fact through to some of you?
The right to choose their mates without governmental direction.Hello Ravi, yer cute when yer pissed. Common, what right do I have that gays don't? Please. They want something more, something else and I go back to my first post on this thread, we are all held accountable to the same standards, some of us just don't like those standards. I am comfortable with the current paradigm of Heterosexual marriage. Why change it? I guess I am NOT empathetic. Sorry.
Having sex with animals isn't violating anyone else's rights. Unless of course, the animals belong to someone else....
Could be a great way to "prove" macroevolution.
Cause animals can consent to sex?
Huh... So where 'science' could show that animals can consent to sexual intercourse... you'd be fine with that?
And that question goes to the others who adhered to the position that the sexual orientation of beastiality lacks the legitimacy of the homo-sexual orientation because animals can't give their verbal consent...
Which of course goes to the same question regarding children.
The APA has issued a 'SCIENTIFIC study' which concludes that children who consent to sexual relationships with adults actually benefit from the experience and that children who are known to have been molested as children do not suffer long term psychological injury...
Do you believe that where 'science' can show that a child is able to give their consent, that an adult who engages in sexual activity with such a child are within their RIGHTS and should not be condemned of suffer any consequences as a result of that decision?
Cause animals can consent to sex?
Huh... So where 'science' could show that animals can consent to sexual intercourse... you'd be fine with that?
And that question goes to the others who adhered to the position that the sexual orientation of beastiality is lacks the legitimacy of the homo-sexual orientation because animals can't give their verbal consent...
Which of course goes to the same question regarding children.
The APA has issued a 'SCIENTIFIC study' which concludes that children who consent to sexual relationships with adults actually benefit from the experience and that children who are known to have been molested as children do not suffer long term psychological injury...
Do you believe that where 'science' can show that a child is able to give their consent, that an adult who engages in sexual activity with such a child are within their RIGHTS and should not be condemned of suffer any consequences as a result of that decision?
Well Nik? What is your answer here?
Do you or do you NOT believe that IF SCIENCE COULD provide the means for animals to CONSENT to Sexual intercourse... would you have any opposition to individuals engaging in Sexual intercourse with Animals?
Same is directed to the rest of you OPEN MINDED CENTRISTS...
Now you've all come to the all TOO "adult and libertarian" view that "CONSENT" is the key to normalizing deviancy... IF SCIENCE provided that Animals WERE able to consent... WOULD THAT PROVIDE ALL YOU NEED TO ENDORSE OR OTHERWISE ACCEPT THOSE WHO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH ANIMALS?
LOL... Come on Girls... it's almost over... You've so few moves left, why allow yourselves to entertain reticence at this point?
Having sex with animals isn't violating anyone else's rights. Unless of course, the animals belong to someone else....
Could be a great way to "prove" macroevolution.
Cause animals can consent to sex?
Cause animals can consent to sex?
Huh... So where 'science' could show that animals can consent to sexual intercourse... you'd be fine with that?
And that question goes to the others who adhered to the position that the sexual orientation of beastiality lacks the legitimacy of the homo-sexual orientation because animals can't give their verbal consent...
Which of course goes to the same question regarding children.
The APA has issued a 'SCIENTIFIC study' which concludes that children who consent to sexual relationships with adults actually benefit from the experience and that children who are known to have been molested as children do not suffer long term psychological injury...
Do you believe that where 'science' can show that a child is able to give their consent, that an adult who engages in sexual activity with such a child are within their RIGHTS and should not be condemned of suffer any consequences as a result of that decision?
THE ADVOCACY OF THE NORMALIZATION OF HOMOSEXUALITY>>>>>Yes, I'd be fine with it.
Nik said:And you are lying about the APA study. I know several people who were molested as kids. All of them are still effected by it, even though it is years later.
Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm,regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. ...
Having sex with animals isn't violating anyone else's rights. Unless of course, the animals belong to someone else....
Could be a great way to "prove" macroevolution.
Cause animals can consent to sex?
Mary Grace O'Brien, Commonwealth's Attorney, was examining the defendant in a bestiality case on this exact point. She said, "And it's a fact that at no time did the sheep consent."
The witness said, "No, that's not true, she did consent."
Mary Grace: "Just how do you know that?" Sarcasm dripping.
Witness: "'Cuz she turned around an licked my hand."
Heard from the juror's box: "Yep, they'll do that!"
Mistrial