Obama's Middle East Plan: Destabilize, Disperse, Destroy

Obama gets his orders straight from Tel Aviv. ....... :cool:

Lol always the JJJJJOOOOSSS fault. It doesn't matter if the actions goes against Israel and provides her zero benefit.

It is well within Israel's best interest to have stable gov in the Middle East.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it

Certainly seems deliberate, including Obama's championing of the Muslim Brotherhood and the whole orchestrated "Arab Spring", which was designed to enhance the destablisation process.

Who's pulling the strings? The usual suspects, the psychopathic Neo-Conservatives, they're insane and evil, their intention is to begin WWIII, this has been their wet dream for at least a decade. They're completely apolitical, they have no loyalty to any actual political party, they just need puppets.

Obama is a great puppet, Hillary is a proven puppet, Ted Cruz would be a good puppet....The Donald no chance. This is why they're terrified of The Donald, they know he'll flush the psychopathic Neo-Conservatives from The State Department and The Pentagon.

There's plenty of people within The State Department and The Pentagon who loathe the Neo-Conservatives, the latter are a danger to all life on this planet.

If you fired all of the Communists and NeoCons at State and the Pentagon, only the cleaning crew would remain
I sometimes wonder who the hell Trump is going to get to work in government.

But I am a bit skeptical that he is a total outsider. I was watching the correspondents dinner this morning, the latest one, and it occurred to me, Trump was invited to the last one.

How much of an "outsider" could he have really been if he has been invited to all these elite functions? He really is with the "IN" crowd.

Did you get around to watching the latest correspondents dinner? I was surprised some bed wetter hadn't made a worship thread about it yet. It's always good to be informed. No matter how much you hate the guy, he is entertaining. . .

I think about JFK, Reagan, Bush, etc. Then I think about Obama. . . He would make a much better stand-up comedian than a president. :badgrin:

.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it

Certainly seems deliberate, including Obama's championing of the Muslim Brotherhood and the whole orchestrated "Arab Spring", which was designed to enhance the destablisation process.

Who's pulling the strings? The usual suspects, the psychopathic Neo-Conservatives, they're insane and evil, their intention is to begin WWIII, this has been their wet dream for at least a decade. They're completely apolitical, they have no loyalty to any actual political party, they just need puppets.

Obama is a great puppet, Hillary is a proven puppet, Ted Cruz would be a good puppet....The Donald no chance. This is why they're terrified of The Donald, they know he'll flush the psychopathic Neo-Conservatives from The State Department and The Pentagon.

There's plenty of people within The State Department and The Pentagon who loathe the Neo-Conservatives, the latter are a danger to all life on this planet.
Do you know where the Arab Spring began?

It began in 2010 in Tunisia, then in 2011 Obama got on the Muslim Brotherhood Cheerleading Squad in Egypt, then he supported the lunatic Mohamed Morsi, then also in 2011 Obama decided it was a good idea to destabilise Libya, also around 2011-2012 Obama supported the Satanic House of Saud and the further destabilisation of Yemen, which is ongoing etc.

In Libya the Tuareg were armed, then post-Gaddafi and post-Benghazi, the Tuareg turned up in Mali to help the Islamists in that nation cause chaos....then many of the same Tuareg were shipped into Syria, where the propaganda Western MSM attempt to convince the gullible they're "Syrians" and part of the "Moderate Syrian Rebels", when in actual fact they're Libyans and there are NO "Moderate" rebels, Syrian or otherwise.

The brotherhood was ELECTED IN Egypt ! Remember All that "Bring democracy to the Middle East". bullshit that Republicans were slinging in the early 2000's?

Now u want to keep all dictators place ! Republicans are such hypocrites . And u never learn from past Mid East mistakes .

Huh? You need to read more.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?
He isn't my messiah. He is my president. Which just infuriates bitter, frothing-at-the-mouth old men like you. But, you and your ilk are dying off and you all will be dead soon.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?
He isn't my messiah. He is my president. Which just infuriates bitter, frothing-at-the-mouth old men like you. But, you and your ilk are dying off and you all will be dead soon.

Wow, what a charmer you aren't :rolleyes-41:

Those comments hit a raw nerve didn't they?
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?

Leftists are used to either blaming GWB or Ronald Reagan, they think their own are pristine creatures.

Hence you'll never get a Leftist condemning the NATO bombing of the Serbs, or Bill Clinton sitting on his hands during the Rwanda Genocide....or Obama f-cking up Libya or the Benghazi incident....or arming and funding ISIL/ISIS/Daesh....or supporting the Muslim Brotherhood etc.

Libya was created by the Libyan people rising up against a brutal dictator . We just gave them air cover from Qudaffis Air Force .

Who new conservatives were so in love wh dictators?
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?
Only by useful idiots who can't debate my posts
There is nothing to debate with your posts. They all come down to:

Democrat: bad, bad, bad

Republican: good, good, good

Actually, I don't think Frank likes the Republicans, he is like most sober minded Americans.

Government: bad, bad, bad.

People power: good, good, good.

ronald_reagan_quote.jpg
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?

Leftists are used to either blaming GWB or Ronald Reagan, they think their own are pristine creatures.

Hence you'll never get a Leftist condemning the NATO bombing of the Serbs, or Bill Clinton sitting on his hands during the Rwanda Genocide....or Obama f-cking up Libya or the Benghazi incident....or arming and funding ISIL/ISIS/Daesh....or supporting the Muslim Brotherhood etc.

Libya was created by the Libyan people rising up against a brutal dictator . We just gave them air cover from Qudaffis Air Force .

Who new conservatives were so in love wh dictators?

How naïve you are....you also appear to have drunk all the Kool-Aid.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?
Only by useful idiots who can't debate my posts
There is nothing to debate with your posts. They all come down to:

Democrat: bad, bad, bad

Republican: good, good, good

You missed my posts where I say the entire Bush family is evil and if Dante were still handing seats out to the Inferno they'd be down in the 9th Circle with the rest of the traitors?
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
It's not just Obama, it's the whole establishment.

Did you see Obama's most recent correspondents dinner? The entire establishment was invited. What the hell was "Reince" Priebus doing there? :dunno:

Even Trump was invited. Trump didn't show up this time though. Gee, I wonder why. :dev3:

This policy was in place well before Obama. It's called the Project for a New (or Greater) Middle East.



brzezinski | The New Middle East Project

The 4th Media » Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”

The fact is, both establishment Republicans and Democrats have the same foreign policy because they are funded by the military-industrial-complex. It's about making money and taking away the people's civil rights and liberties. It's all political rhetoric that is completely the same today as it was back then. Things never change because the elites all crave power and money.

They don't give a shit about the American people.




Syria and Libya were next up no matter who won the election. And if they hadn't been successful in covertly assassinating President Chavez, the CIA might have continued beefing up the assistance to Columbia to overthrow him with narco-rebels. It wouldn't have made a damn bit of difference if it had been Obama or Romney, the same policies would have prevailed. The Deep State always gets what it desires.
. Ok, but then add a sympathizer president like Barak Hussein Obama to the mix, and it revealed a whole new ideology and position to be taken on it all. Now was he fighting against Islamic extremism as previous administration's were or was he Obama actually aiding and abetting it ? There is a difference, and so it just depends on the positions or the ideologies of the players that sit down at the table.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?
He isn't my messiah. He is my president. Which just infuriates bitter, frothing-at-the-mouth old men like you. But, you and your ilk are dying off and you all will be dead soon.

Wow, what a charmer you aren't :rolleyes-41:

Those comments hit a raw nerve didn't they?
No. Actually, I find this shit amusing. It is a great break from reality.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?
He isn't my messiah. He is my president. Which just infuriates bitter, frothing-at-the-mouth old men like you. But, you and your ilk are dying off and you all will be dead soon.

My "ilk" are people who love freedom. You ilk are servile people who worship at the feet of an autocrat. Your inability to see any of his numerous flaws proves he is your messiah.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?

Leftists are used to either blaming GWB or Ronald Reagan, they think their own are pristine creatures.

Hence you'll never get a Leftist condemning the NATO bombing of the Serbs, or Bill Clinton sitting on his hands during the Rwanda Genocide....or Obama f-cking up Libya or the Benghazi incident....or arming and funding ISIL/ISIS/Daesh....or supporting the Muslim Brotherhood etc.

Libya was created by the Libyan people rising up against a brutal dictator . We just gave them air cover from Qudaffis Air Force .

Who new conservatives were so in love wh dictators?

We dropped enough bombs on Libya to make the rubble bounce.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?
He isn't my messiah. He is my president. Which just infuriates bitter, frothing-at-the-mouth old men like you. But, you and your ilk are dying off and you all will be dead soon.

My "ilk" are people who love freedom. You ilk are servile people who worship at the feet of an autocrat. You inability to see any of his numerous flaws proves he is your messiah.

"You inability to see any of his numerous flaws proves he is your messiah."

It's illustrative of the full-on Kool-Aid drinkers.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?
He isn't my messiah. He is my president. Which just infuriates bitter, frothing-at-the-mouth old men like you. But, you and your ilk are dying off and you all will be dead soon.
. What you gonna do when their ideology or beliefs are passed on to their relatives, friends or associates ? LOL. Kind of crazy to hope that the death of a generation will somehow contain your fears... Hmm, unless you figure that the current generation won't somehow inform the new one in time, and this will be your window of opportunity to thrust in the final stake to overcome them in their ignorance.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it

Certainly seems deliberate, including Obama's championing of the Muslim Brotherhood and the whole orchestrated "Arab Spring", which was designed to enhance the destablisation process.

Who's pulling the strings? The usual suspects, the psychopathic Neo-Conservatives, they're insane and evil, their intention is to begin WWIII, this has been their wet dream for at least a decade. They're completely apolitical, they have no loyalty to any actual political party, they just need puppets.

Obama is a great puppet, Hillary is a proven puppet, Ted Cruz would be a good puppet....The Donald no chance. This is why they're terrified of The Donald, they know he'll flush the psychopathic Neo-Conservatives from The State Department and The Pentagon.

There's plenty of people within The State Department and The Pentagon who loathe the Neo-Conservatives, the latter are a danger to all life on this planet.
Do you know where the Arab Spring began?

in obamas smoke filled college dorm room
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it

Certainly seems deliberate, including Obama's championing of the Muslim Brotherhood and the whole orchestrated "Arab Spring", which was designed to enhance the destablisation process.

Who's pulling the strings? The usual suspects, the psychopathic Neo-Conservatives, they're insane and evil, their intention is to begin WWIII, this has been their wet dream for at least a decade. They're completely apolitical, they have no loyalty to any actual political party, they just need puppets.

Obama is a great puppet, Hillary is a proven puppet, Ted Cruz would be a good puppet....The Donald no chance. This is why they're terrified of The Donald, they know he'll flush the psychopathic Neo-Conservatives from The State Department and The Pentagon.

There's plenty of people within The State Department and The Pentagon who loathe the Neo-Conservatives, the latter are a danger to all life on this planet.
Do you know where the Arab Spring began?

in obamas smoke filled college dorm room
. Yep, and no one else had to be in the room except for the dreams of his father.
 
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?
He isn't my messiah. He is my president. Which just infuriates bitter, frothing-at-the-mouth old men like you. But, you and your ilk are dying off and you all will be dead soon.

My "ilk" are people who love freedom. You ilk are servile people who worship at the feet of an autocrat. You inability to see any of his numerous flaws proves he is your messiah.

"You inability to see any of his numerous flaws proves he is your messiah."

It's illustrative of the full-on Kool-Aid drinkers.
The assumptions you two make are quite entertaining; completely wrong, but entertaining.

Now, I have to get back to reality, but you two may carry on the rest of the day posting to the internet and changing the world. I'll stop back when I get a break for a chuckle.
 
:eek-52:
It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it
It's not just Obama, it's the whole establishment.

Did you see Obama's most recent correspondents dinner? The entire establishment was invited. What the hell was "Reince" Priebus doing there? :dunno:

Even Trump was invited. Trump didn't show up this time though. Gee, I wonder why. :dev3:

This policy was in place well before Obama. It's called the Project for a New (or Greater) Middle East.



brzezinski | The New Middle East Project

The 4th Media » Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”

The fact is, both establishment Republicans and Democrats have the same foreign policy because they are funded by the military-industrial-complex. It's about making money and taking away the people's civil rights and liberties. It's all political rhetoric that is completely the same today as it was back then. Things never change because the elites all crave power and money.

They don't give a shit about the American people.




Syria and Libya were next up no matter who won the election. And if they hadn't been successful in covertly assassinating President Chavez, the CIA might have continued beefing up the assistance to Columbia to overthrow him with narco-rebels. It wouldn't have made a damn bit of difference if it had been Obama or Romney, the same policies would have prevailed. The Deep State always gets what it desires.
. Ok, but then add a sympathizer president like Barak Hussein Obama to the mix, and it revealed a whole new ideology and position to be taken on it all. Now was he fighting against Islamic extremism as previous administration's were or was he Obama actually aiding and abetting it ? There is a difference, and so it just depends on the positions or the ideologies of the players that sit down at the table.

You are making the tacit assumption that what you see and hear about this administration and the last administration from your MSM news sources, are, in fact, the truth.

Dispense with that illusion forth with.

isisvssaudicartoon.jpg


The Bush administration was not, "fighting Islamic extremism." It only made up a pretense in the public eye to do so. It had always been allied with Saudi Arabia, ALWAYS. If you don't believe me, search the history of what planes were flying when every plane was grounded right after 9/11, and who was aboard those flights.

Those pages are damning to the Saudis. The Saudis fund terrorists, and we fund the Saudis. It is as simple as that.

Why does Obama not want those 28 redacted pages of the 9/11 commission report released? Remember who censored those pages in the first place, eh?


To say the Obama admin defends and supports terror and the last one doesn't is to just admit you don't pay attention to what is going on in the world.
 

Forum List

Back
Top