Obama's lead over Romney grows

[Jackson]

rass always leans to the right on their polls from the rest.

they dont make a good standard to use

They are always the most accurate pollsters, using the most recent data and likely voters. They were the most accurate pollsters in the 2004 and 2008 elections.

prove it

A Fordham University report by Costas Panagopoulos rates the pollsters for this presidential election. Here are the most accurate:

1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**
1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**[/B

]3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)
4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)
5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*
6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*
6T. ARG (10/25-27)*
8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)
8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)
10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)
11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)
12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)
13. FOX (11/1-2)
14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)
15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)
16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)
17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)
18. Marist College (11/3)
19. CBS (10/31-11/2)
20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)
21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)
22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)
23. Newsweek (10/22-23)
Thanks go to Texas On The Potomac for the heads up.
Most Accurate Pollsters in 2008 election | Political Vindication
______________________________________
2004
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[37] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[38]
In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[37]
[edit] 2008
According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[39] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[40]
Rasmussen Reports - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Jackson]

A Fordham University report by Costas Panagopoulos rates the pollsters for this presidential election. Here are the most accurate:

1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**
1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**

3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)
4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)
5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*
6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*
6T. ARG (10/25-27)*
8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)
8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)
10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)
11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)
12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)
13. FOX (11/1-2)
14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)
15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)
16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)
17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)
18. Marist College (11/3)
19. CBS (10/31-11/2)
20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)
21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)
22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)
23. Newsweek (10/22-23)
Thanks go to Texas On The Potomac for the heads up.
Most Accurate Pollsters in 2008 election | Political Vindication
______________________________________
2004
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[37] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[38]
In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[37]
[edit] 2008

According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[39] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[40]
Rasmussen Reports - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[peach174]

Democrats are the ones who have voter suppression.
When you have no one else to vote for except President Obama with no one else running against him. that is true voter suppression.
When you have no Republican to vote for and only one Democrat to vote for in your district for your state Representative, that is voter suppression.
Communists do this type of thing, no choice for the voters to vote for.
This is what has happened in our state.
We have one Democrat to vote for in District 2 here in Arizona and no one else, not a Republican or any other independent party.
This is true voter suppression Truthmatters and it is done by the Democrats.

 

[driveby]

Voter ID laws will be the blame if Obama loses......

hey your off topic here

Get off my nuts, ho......

 

[Truthmatters]

just trying to follow the rules laid down

 

[Truthmatters]

who is this guy Costas Panagopoulos ?

 

[HUGGY]

Obama's lead over Romney grows despite voters' pessimism | Reuters

(Reuters) - Americans are increasingly pessimistic about the future but voters do not seem to be holding it against Democratic President Barack Obama, who slightly expanded his lead over Republican rival Mitt Romney this month, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll says.

Three months before the November 6 presidential election, nearly two-thirds of Americans think the country is moving in the wrong direction. Only 31 percent say it is moving in the right direction - the lowest number since December 2011.

But Obama's lead over Romney among registered voters was 49 percent to 42 percent, up slightly from the 6-point advantage the president held a month earlier over the former Massachusetts governor.
<more>

Apparently any "corporate raider bishop cultist dog abusing tax evader" isn't working as well as hoped.

 

[The Infidel]

just trying to follow the rules laid down

Go play in traffic troll.

 

[Jackson]

just trying to follow the rules laid down

Are you going to accept that Rasmussen is a pretty credible pollster? The thing is, RCP and the others are usually dated and do not include most likely voters/

 

[Truthmatters]

the country is trying to get to KNOW robmoney and he keeps telling them its none of their business who he is

 

[Truthmatters]

just trying to follow the rules laid down

Are you going to accept that Rasmussen is a pretty credible pollster? The thing is, RCP and the others are usually dated and do not include most likely voters/

Are you going to accept court documented facts?

 

[ConservaDerrps]

Has anyone mentioned this little beautiful gem?

From the article linked in the OP:

Even so, in a reversal from July, registered voters thought Obama was stronger than Romney in dealing with jobs and the economy, and with tax issues.

The poll indicated that 46 percent of registered voters thought Obama was stronger on jobs and the economy, compared with 44 percent for Romney. And on tax matters, 49 percent saw Obama as stronger, compared with 38 percent for Romney.

Ha ha ha ha ha! Even the "Romney's better at the economy and jobs" line is now falling short. Think Americans are starting to see that Romney represents everything that they hate about the state of the American economy?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

 

[peach174]

Polls have been pretty consistent that it will be a close race.

RealClearPolitics - Latest Polls

 

[Truthmatters]

just trying to follow the rules laid down

Go play in traffic troll.

your party is going to lose because your party is filled with people who have NO commitment to fairness

 

[Jackson]

who is this guy Costas Panagopoulos ?

Fordham is an influential private college, ranking 53rd out of 280.

 

[Truthmatters]

and you can prove hes not a partisan hack?

 

[Jackson]

just trying to follow the rules laid down

Are you going to accept that Rasmussen is a pretty credible pollster? The thing is, RCP and the others are usually dated and do not include most likely voters/

Are you going to accept court documented facts?

You are not a very big person, are you? Do you know what integrity is?

 

[thanatos144]

Are you going to accept that Rasmussen is a pretty credible pollster? The thing is, RCP and the others are usually dated and do not include most likely voters/

Are you going to accept court documented facts?

You are not a very big person, are you? Do you know what integrity is?

Of course she doesn't ....She is a progressive.

 

[Jackson]

and you can prove hes not a partisan hack?

And prove to me he is. He represents Fordham UNiversity and documents the results. Those are not made up figures, missy. Fail.

 

[jillian]

Are you going to accept that Rasmussen is a pretty credible pollster? The thing is, RCP and the others are usually dated and do not include most likely voters/

actually, rasmussen is not the most credible of posters. there are far better ones. realistically, the best measure is RCP average. and likely voters isn't really reliable until closer to the election.

the right's reliance on rasmussen speaks for itself.