- Banned
- #21
Bound for the Supremes.
It'll come back the same way, since those appointments were unconstitutional
I thought the same thing about ocare
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bound for the Supremes.
It'll come back the same way, since those appointments were unconstitutional
Have you looked at all the vacancies of fed. Judges recently? I'm not saying I agree with what he did, but the volume of blocking appointees, not because you take issue with the person, but simply in order to annoy the President is turning into a serious issue.
Bound for the Supremes.
Rather than wasting our tax dollars on trivial shit why doesn't he just follow the proper channels?
Have you looked at all the vacancies of fed. Judges recently? I'm not saying I agree with what he did, but the volume of blocking appointees, not because you take issue with the person, but simply in order to annoy the President is turning into a serious issue.
Right, when democrats did it to Bush, it wasn't that serious, but that was just different, somehow.
Have you looked at all the vacancies of fed. Judges recently? I'm not saying I agree with what he did, but the volume of blocking appointees, not because you take issue with the person, but simply in order to annoy the President is turning into a serious issue.
Right, when democrats did it to Bush, it wasn't that serious, but that was just different, somehow.
I didn't say dems didn't do it, however it gets worse and worse each presidency. What was an annoyance under Clinton, a backlog under Bush has become a halt in the justice system under Obama. You have the right to a speedy trial, a man shouldn't have to sit in jail for years and years waiting for his case to be heard because there are no available judges.
Have you looked at all the vacancies of fed. Judges recently? I'm not saying I agree with what he did, but the volume of blocking appointees, not because you take issue with the person, but simply in order to annoy the President is turning into a serious issue.
Right, when democrats did it to Bush, it wasn't that serious, but that was just different, somehow.
I didn't say dems didn't do it, however it gets worse and worse each presidency. What was an annoyance under Clinton, a backlog under Bush has become a halt in the justice system under Obama. You have the right to a speedy trial, a man shouldn't have to sit in jail for years and years waiting for his case to be heard because there are no available judges.
Bound for the Supremes.
Rather than wasting our tax dollars on trivial shit why doesn't he just follow the proper channels?
Why does the Senate require 60 votes to confirm a post?
Bound for the Supremes.
Rather than wasting our tax dollars on trivial shit why doesn't he just follow the proper channels?
Have you looked at all the vacancies of fed. Judges recently? I'm not saying I agree with what he did, but the volume of blocking appointees, not because you take issue with the person, but simply in order to annoy the President is turning into a serious issue.
Right, when democrats did it to Bush, it wasn't that serious, but that was just different, somehow.
Docket Is Full, but Judges Are Few: Federal judges see a jump in cases as court vacancies go unfilled - News - The Austin ChronicleRight, when democrats did it to Bush, it wasn't that serious, but that was just different, somehow.
I didn't say dems didn't do it, however it gets worse and worse each presidency. What was an annoyance under Clinton, a backlog under Bush has become a halt in the justice system under Obama. You have the right to a speedy trial, a man shouldn't have to sit in jail for years and years waiting for his case to be heard because there are no available judges.
I have not heard of anyone waiting on a trial because a judge can not be located.
well why don't we make Obama king !!then he could year up the constitution.............libbs would love it !!Bound for the Supremes.
Rather than wasting our tax dollars on trivial shit why doesn't he just follow the proper channels?
Because if he did that..nothing would get done.
The new Consumer Protection Department has no Head and neither does the ATF. The Senate has made extreme parlimentary procedures BAU.
The Senate was not in session..they had a couple of guys camping out.
Bound for the Supremes.
Rather than wasting our tax dollars on trivial shit why doesn't he just follow the proper channels?
Because if he did that..nothing would get done.
The new Consumer Protection Department has no Head and neither does the ATF. The Senate has made extreme parlimentary procedures BAU.
The Senate was not in session..they had a couple of guys camping out.
USSC will not touch this. No reason to. The appointments were invalid. Everyone knew it. Typical over-reach by the amateur narcissist in chief.
Why will Obama not nominate people he knows can get through Congress? Why does he insist on getting radicals with thin resumes? Working across the aisle is a forgotten skill in this administration, although Biden still knows how to do it.
The new Consumer Protection Department has no Head and neither does the ATF. The Senate has made extreme parlimentary procedures BAU.
USSC will not touch this. No reason to. The appointments were invalid. Everyone knew it. Typical over-reach by the amateur narcissist in chief.
Why will Obama not nominate people he knows can get through Congress? Why does he insist on getting radicals with thin resumes? Working across the aisle is a forgotten skill in this administration, although Biden still knows how to do it.
Because it doesn't matter who he nominates for a position. He could nominate a right wing nut job like Scalia and the Republicans would still block it. That's what Republicans do. This administration has tried over and over to work across party lines only to be rebuffed. They are supposed to advise and consent, not deny, block, obfuscate, and filibuster every appointment.
USSC will not touch this. No reason to. The appointments were invalid. Everyone knew it. Typical over-reach by the amateur narcissist in chief.
Why will Obama not nominate people he knows can get through Congress? Why does he insist on getting radicals with thin resumes? Working across the aisle is a forgotten skill in this administration, although Biden still knows how to do it.
Because it doesn't matter who he nominates for a position. He could nominate a right wing nut job like Scalia and the Republicans would still block it. That's what Republicans do. This administration has tried over and over to work across party lines only to be rebuffed. They are supposed to advise and consent, not deny, block, obfuscate, and filibuster every appointment.
They are supposed to advise and consent?
Lol
Because it doesn't matter who he nominates for a position. He could nominate a right wing nut job like Scalia and the Republicans would still block it. That's what Republicans do. This administration has tried over and over to work across party lines only to be rebuffed. They are supposed to advise and consent, not deny, block, obfuscate, and filibuster every appointment.
They are supposed to advise and consent?
Lol
Maybe that only applies when a republican is president.