Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Read the OP. There was no "I think he is going to." There was no "I predict he will."
It was stated as a certainty.
No one is fooled by these partisan pundits.
Well...some people are fooled. Open-mouth piss drinkers are.
.
Read the OP. There was no "I think he is going to." There was no "I predict he will."
It was stated as a certainty.
No one is fooled by these partisan pundits.
Well...some people are fooled. Open-mouth piss drinkers are.
.
Read the OP. There was no "I think he is going to." There was no "I predict he will."
It was stated as a certainty.
No one is fooled by these partisan pundits.
Well...some people are fooled. Open-mouth piss drinkers are.
.
I'm pretty sure that's why the OP put quotes around "going to ..." in the title of the thread. It's pretty obvious, based on the OP, that Levin said that because the OP quotes Levin.
We'll see what Obama actually does. Given his current situation in the federal courts, I'm not so sure Obama will want to try this, IMO.
Weve never had a president thats spent like this ever. Ever. Thats why, in particular right now, the debt ceiling is so crucial, because theres no other way to stop him.
Isn't there a Schoolhouse Rock explaining what the branches of government do? If so, find it and review it so as to understand where spending comes from.
Read the OP. There was no "I think he is going to." There was no "I predict he will."
It was stated as a certainty.
No one is fooled by these partisan pundits.
Well...some people are fooled. Open-mouth piss drinkers are.
.
I'm pretty sure that's why the OP put quotes around "going to ..." in the title of the thread. It's pretty obvious, based on the OP, that Levin said that because the OP quotes Levin.
We'll see what Obama actually does. Given his current situation in the federal courts, I'm not so sure Obama will want to try this, IMO.
Hmm, our Forefathers signed a contract that established the Republic and instituted Constitutional Law.
I'm doing MY part by obeying Laws and Paying Taxes, but it seems to me those in power in Washington are not sticking to the terms of the Agreement.
When that happens, it's every mans right to demand the other party adhere to the terms of the contract. And in this case, the Gov't only exists through the good graces of The People. The People are Sovereign, NOT the Gov't.
If not, we have every right to break the contract and Secede.
Read the OP. There was no "I think he is going to." There was no "I predict he will."
It was stated as a certainty.
No one is fooled by these partisan pundits.
Well...some people are fooled. Open-mouth piss drinkers are.
.
I'm pretty sure that's why the OP put quotes around "going to ..." in the title of the thread. It's pretty obvious, based on the OP, that Levin said that because the OP quotes Levin.
We'll see what Obama actually does. Given his current situation in the federal courts, I'm not so sure Obama will want to try this, IMO.
This is what he does everyday... I doubt it as well but it doesn't mean that I can't post Levin's view on it. g5000 can grasp that concept.
Hmm, our Forefathers signed a contract that established the Republic and instituted Constitutional Law.
I'm doing MY part by obeying Laws and Paying Taxes, but it seems to me those in power in Washington are not sticking to the terms of the Agreement.
When that happens, it's every mans right to demand the other party adhere to the terms of the contract. And in this case, the Gov't only exists through the good graces of The People. The People are Sovereign, NOT the Gov't.
If not, we have every right to break the contract and Secede.
Hard to argue with. The Federal Government is in breach of the social contract. But since 51% of voters put the miscreants back into power, what basis have we to enforce the contract?
I'm pretty sure that's why the OP put quotes around "going to ..." in the title of the thread. It's pretty obvious, based on the OP, that Levin said that because the OP quotes Levin.
We'll see what Obama actually does. Given his current situation in the federal courts, I'm not so sure Obama will want to try this, IMO.
This is what he does everyday... I doubt it as well but it doesn't mean that I can't post Levin's view on it. g5000 can grasp that concept.
You are a piss drinking hack. You take your cues from other hacks. What would you do if you had to think for yourself and had to give up your desperate desire to believe so much bullshit that fits your biases?
You can be better than this.
.
Considering I rendered no initial opinion on the subject, we would all love to know how you came to that insightful deduction.
I notice in this long post there is not a single shred of evidence that Obama plans on raising the debt ceiling unconstitutionally. You just have some heavily biased partisan pundit saying Obama will.
So please provide that evidence.
Thanks.
.
Congress can still vote against any spending.
The debt ceiling is completely unnecessary and complete idiocy.
A claim was made. I want to see the evidence.
And yes, Congress is the body that spends all the money, which in turns requires us to borrow that money, which in turn pushes us over the debt ceiling.
So it is the height of hypocrisy for anyone in Congress to bitch and scream about the debt ceiling being raised when they are the ones who spent that money. And it is the height of hypocrisy for any partisan asshole to bitch about the debt ceiling being raised when their party was a full and willing partner in the spending of that money.
Nonetheless, a claim was made. I want to see the evidence. I am sick of this shit.
.
Congress can still vote against any spending.
The debt ceiling is completely unnecessary and complete idiocy.
A claim was made. I want to see the evidence.
And yes, Congress is the body that spends all the money, which in turns requires us to borrow that money, which in turn pushes us over the debt ceiling.
So it is the height of hypocrisy for anyone in Congress to bitch and scream about the debt ceiling being raised when they are the ones who spent that money. And it is the height of hypocrisy for any partisan asshole to bitch about the debt ceiling being raised when their party was a full and willing partner in the spending of that money.
Nonetheless, a claim was made. I want to see the evidence. I am sick of this shit.
.
That always seems to get missed.
Read the OP. There was no "I think he is going to." There was no "I predict he will."
It was stated as a certainty.
No one is fooled by these partisan pundits.
Well...some people are fooled. Open-mouth piss drinkers are.
.
I'm pretty sure that's why the OP put quotes around "going to ..." in the title of the thread. It's pretty obvious, based on the OP, that Levin said that because the OP quotes Levin.
We'll see what Obama actually does. Given his current situation in the federal courts, I'm not so sure Obama will want to try this, IMO.
This is what he does everyday... I doubt it as well but it doesn't mean that I can't post Levin's view on it. g5000 can grasp that concept.
There's no debt limit or ceiling in there.
Try again.
ROFL;
Say goodnight gracie..
I'm pretty sure that's why the OP put quotes around "going to ..." in the title of the thread. It's pretty obvious, based on the OP, that Levin said that because the OP quotes Levin.
We'll see what Obama actually does. Given his current situation in the federal courts, I'm not so sure Obama will want to try this, IMO.
This is what he does everyday... I doubt it as well but it doesn't mean that I can't post Levin's view on it. g5000 can grasp that concept.
Your's and Levin's premise is completely incorrect.
Obama isn't violating the Constitution.
But you seem to ignore each and every germane point made toward that fact.
It's sorta frustrating.
Will the pubs get us another mark down on our credit rating?
Even though they can't lie about whose fault it is, I think they want to.
Actually, there's not much the pubs would not do to hurt the US.
Was a simple task.
Seems you failed at it.
The authority to borrow is where based on the constitution? With the supreme dictator?
Read the OP. There was no "I think he is going to." There was no "I predict he will."
It was stated as a certainty.
No one is fooled by these partisan pundits.
Well...some people are fooled. Open-mouth piss drinkers are.
.
I'm pretty sure that's why the OP put quotes around "going to ..." in the title of the thread. It's pretty obvious, based on the OP, that Levin said that because the OP quotes Levin.
Yes, Levin pissed and beretta drank it and regurgitated it. That's my point.
We'll see what Obama actually does. Given his current situation in the federal courts, I'm not so sure Obama will want to try this, IMO.
Here's my prediction, and I am saying unequivocally this is a prediction: Obama will not unilaterally raise the debt ceiling without Congressional authority to do so.
beretta drank Levin's piss and regurgitated the piss that Obama will raise the ceiling in violation of the Constitution because he has a strong desire to believe it and wanted all of us to share in that belief. And apparently you want to believe it as well.
Later, when Obama does not violate the Constitution, I predict we won't hear a peep about how embarrassingly wrong he was.
.
This is what he does everyday... I doubt it as well but it doesn't mean that I can't post Levin's view on it. g5000 can grasp that concept.
Your's and Levin's premise is completely incorrect.
Obama isn't violating the Constitution.
But you seem to ignore each and every germane point made toward that fact.
It's sorta frustrating.
You missed post # 123.
This is what he does everyday... I doubt it as well but it doesn't mean that I can't post Levin's view on it. g5000 can grasp that concept.
