Obama's attorneys file motion: Birth, college records to be withheld from public

Discussion in 'Politics' started by KMAN, Feb 13, 2009.

  1. KMAN
    Offline

    KMAN Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,683
    Thanks Received:
    268
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +269
  2. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,550
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    Apparently, you have no understanding, once again, of what is actually occuring. You might want to fix that before you hit the post button next time.

    The case is frivolous. There SHOULD be sanctions. And the psychotic idiots who keep pursuing it should have to pay for his legal fees.

    Works for me. ;)

    do you even know anything about the wingnuts pursuing it?

    of course, you don't.
     
  3. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,503
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    Let me get this right? Bush released all details about his life, including his college information and his birth information. BUT Obama refuses to allow his or his wife's records to be released. And you applaud that?

    Simple enough, if wing nuts are pursuing his records in court, he should do as past Presidents have and simply RELEASE the information to EVERYONE. He keeps claiming he has nothing to hide. You keep claiming along with him his admin is transparent. Yet he actively is working to HIDE basic information that has always been available about past Presidents when asked.

    The problem we have right now is the Press still refuses to their job and INVESTIGATE Obama, his family and his ties as aggressively ( hell at all) like they have for past Presidents. They do not even actively question him AS President.

    Remind me Jillian, if Bush had demanded his College records and his wife's college records be hidden from the public, what would you have been shrieking again?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,550
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    Bush released all records?!?!?!? RAFLMAO!!!!

    Where are the lost records of why he didn't get recertified to fly or show up for his physical.

    or the ones that show how daddy's friends got him into the guard so his little frat boy butt wouldn't go to vietnam.

    or the ones that showed why he was in alabama working on his daddy's friend's campaign instead of being in the guard.

    Remind ME of that.

    Obama's records WERE released. Only conspiracy theorists say otherwise. And someone who uses the court system for frivolous cases should pay.

    That's the LAW.

    No matter what your wingnut butt thinks.
     
  5. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    38,225
    Thanks Received:
    7,833
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,782
    I think that if the truth ever be known, and these records are located and released, we'll find that oblahblah isn't even eligible to be President.

    There can only be ONE REASON he HIDES this information... and that's because there's SOMETHING TO HIDE!

    But, no one cares... apathy reigns in America. The libs have their messiah, and they're damn sure going to see to it that they keep him.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2009
  6. michiganFats
    Offline

    michiganFats BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,055
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    Ratings:
    +171
    I think if there were anything to this story, Hillary would have used it during the Primary season. However, I think it just looks bad that Obama wants to keep some of his records concealed. If there's really nothing to this, why not just make the records available and be done with this nonsense?
     
  7. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,503
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    Once again retard, are you SURE you went to Law School? I can not believe a tr5ained Lawyer would make the bald faced outright lies you just uttered. Bush released every single record of his military time. It is recorded FACT. The things YOU claim are not in those records because they never HAPPENED.

    As for why Bush was in Alabama? Once again you stupid shit, ANYONE of any rank in the Guard , for any reason, can ask for and be temperally transfered while in the GUARD. I worked in the second highest Headquarters for the State of Washington National Guard as a personnel clerk. I routinely filed those requests and they almost uniformly were always granted.

    He did not take a flight physical because he no longer would be flying. His aircraft was being decommissioned, Alabama did not use that Aircraft and he did not have enough time remaining to qualify in another Aircraft. All a matter of PUBLIC Record.

    The only thing you left wing nuts have is a forged piece of paper that Dan Rather claimed was real. Never mind it was typed in a format no one in the National Guard used at the time, never mind that the General that supposedly ordered the favorably treatment had been RETIRED for over a YEAR of the date on the forged document. Never mind that the DEAD Col's family stated for the PUBLIC Record that he liked and admired Lt Bush as a promising Pilot and Officer. That he had told them that on more than one occasion when discussing his pilots with his wife.

    I am STILL waiting for this mythical LIST that existed from which Bush was pushed to the top. I am STILL waiting to have it explained to me if he wanted to avoid Vietnam why did he pick a fighter pilot slot and not a desk job where he would be perfectly safe? Why did he actively pursue a program that would allow him to SERVE in Vietnam? Why did he log more hours then required in the MOST DANGEROUS aircraft the Air Force had at the time?

    Your talking points are no more true now then they were the entire 8 years Bush was in office. THAT could be why you have no evidence. You remember that, being a lawyer and all, evidence?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    38,225
    Thanks Received:
    7,833
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,782
    THAT is the million dollar question, and one the libs would rather make excuses for, when you'd think that as Americans, they'd want to know too. But I guess being a liberal and having your messiah trumps whether or not he can legally be President.

    But what's even more amazing than that is how the very documents that qualify oblahblah for President can be sealed. You'd think that a court would ORDER the release of the ORIGINAL documents, instead of being satisfied with some phony shit cooked up with Adobe photoshop.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2009
  9. PubliusInfinitum
    Offline

    PubliusInfinitum BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    6,805
    Thanks Received:
    725
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +726
    Is it?

    Well let's see if that's true...

    Counselor would you define 'frivolous' for us? I mean there must be a vastly distinct definition as the word relates to the LAW, because where one applies the standard by which most words are defined... a Dictionary, we find that the case is anything BUT frivolous... given the mandate of US Constitution which require that ONLY a natural born citizens of the US be considered for the office of the US Executive and all.

    Now one presumes that the individual bringing the suit is a US Citizen... how can it be argued that a US Citizen does not have a right to hold the US Executive to the BASIC REQUIREMENTS of the US CONSTITUTION?

    Again: Define "Frivolous in legal terms" to show the distinction of the legal and commonly accepted contexts...

    Set forth an basis in reasoning which would explain why a US Citizen would have no right to hold the candidate or holder of the office of the Presidency to Constitutional minimums.
     
  10. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    38,225
    Thanks Received:
    7,833
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,782
    *chirp chirp* ... *chirp chirp* ... *chirp chirp* ... :eusa_eh:
     

Share This Page