Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Funny how conservative Obama tries to be during election year:
Obama corporate taxes: He would slash 'dozens' of tax breaks - Feb. 22, 2012
Obama is admitting that conservatives are right, lower taxes is better for the economy.
It's a concern on both sides of the aisle that tax loopholes are detrimental.
Did he do it for political reasons? Probably, but it's a smarter plan than simply lowering the rate and ignoring the problematic tax code.
So now you agree we were right all along.
Damn, all it took to become a good idea was for a (D) to put his stamp on it.
I love the taste of hypocracy in the morning.
mmm
taste like well done toast.
It's a concern on both sides of the aisle that tax loopholes are detrimental.
Did he do it for political reasons? Probably, but it's a smarter plan than simply lowering the rate and ignoring the problematic tax code.
So now you agree we were right all along.
Damn, all it took to become a good idea was for a (D) to put his stamp on it.
I love the taste of hypocracy in the morning.
mmm
taste like well done toast.
And Chris was right all along that you guys would try and spin this negative.
You guys are so filled with hate for youir President that you refuse to acknowledge when he does something you think is right and agree with. Why is that?
Funny how conservative Obama tries to be during election year:
Obama corporate taxes: He would slash 'dozens' of tax breaks - Feb. 22, 2012
Obama is admitting that conservatives are right, lower taxes is better for the economy.
It's a concern on both sides of the aisle that tax loopholes are detrimental.
Did he do it for political reasons? Probably, but it's a smarter plan than simply lowering the rate and ignoring the problematic tax code.
So now you agree we were right all along.
Damn, all it took to become a good idea was for a (D) to put his stamp on it.
I love the taste of hypocracy in the morning.
mmm
taste like well done toast.
It's a concern on both sides of the aisle that tax loopholes are detrimental.
Did he do it for political reasons? Probably, but it's a smarter plan than simply lowering the rate and ignoring the problematic tax code.
So now you agree we were right all along.
Damn, all it took to become a good idea was for a (D) to put his stamp on it.
I love the taste of hypocracy in the morning.
mmm
taste like well done toast.
So how exactly am I being hypocritical? I favor the plan because it targets tax loopholes.
Funny how conservative Obama tries to be during election year:
Obama corporate taxes: He would slash 'dozens' of tax breaks - Feb. 22, 2012
Obama is admitting that conservatives are right, lower taxes is better for the economy.
It's a concern on both sides of the aisle that tax loopholes are detrimental.
Did he do it for political reasons? Probably, but it's a smarter plan than simply lowering the rate and ignoring the problematic tax code.
So now you agree we were right all along.
Damn, all it took to become a good idea was for a (D) to put his stamp on it.
I love the taste of hypocracy in the morning.
mmm
taste like well done toast.
So now you agree we were right all along.
Damn, all it took to become a good idea was for a (D) to put his stamp on it.
I love the taste of hypocracy in the morning.
mmm
taste like well done toast.
So how exactly am I being hypocritical? I favor the plan because it targets tax loopholes.
Shrinks government. You are against that, fully.
Lowers the tax rate on corporations. you are maniacally against that.
but like I said, the idea has a (D) on it.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3PmFbOQTPU&feature=fvst]yahh trick yahh!-Soulja boy ft Arab( throw some D's) - YouTube[/ame]
It's a concern on both sides of the aisle that tax loopholes are detrimental.
Did he do it for political reasons? Probably, but it's a smarter plan than simply lowering the rate and ignoring the problematic tax code.
So now you agree we were right all along.
Damn, all it took to become a good idea was for a (D) to put his stamp on it.
I love the taste of hypocracy in the morning.
mmm
taste like well done toast.
you mean like the idea of individual mandates for health insurance originally being a republican plan, straight out of the heritage foundation, that magically became "socialist" and "unconstitutional" as soon as it no longer had an (R) on it?
that kind of hypocritical?
Well golly gee, it only took him THREE years to come up this, and surprise surprise it happens to be a election year...
Actually, from what I understand, he's had this plan ready to go for quite awhile, he just waited until the election year to spring it. And I hear he's coming out with a major speech on energy in a coupla days; he must think he American electorate is awfully dumb.
So conservatives were for cutting rates and closing loopholes before they were, now, against them?
lol
WHAT LOOPHOLES?
My god folks, one can't evaluate the benefits of a policy if one doesn't actually know ANY DETAILS, can one?
"The administration is not making sense," says Martin Sullivan, contributing editor at publisher Tax Analysts. "The whole idea of corporate tax reform is to get rid of loopholes, and this plan is adding loopholes back in."
Other economists oppose a separate plank of the Obama plan: a minimum tax on foreign earnings of U.S. multinational companies. No other country imposes such a tax on its companies, they note. U.S. businesses would face a competitive disadvantage.
Among the skeptics is Obama's own former economic adviser, Christina Romer, an economics professor at the University of California, Berkeley. In a column this month in The New York Times, Romer argued that there was no economic justification for the government to favor manufacturers over service-oriented companies.
"Our earnings from exporting architectural plans for a building in Shanghai are as real as those from exporting cars to Canada," Romer wrote.
The minimum tax proposal for international earnings "is totally misguided both from a competitive standpoint and a jobs standpoint," said Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "Obama's plan, if enacted, will shrink the U.S. footprint in world markets and lose jobs."
It's a concern on both sides of the aisle that tax loopholes are detrimental.
Did he do it for political reasons? Probably, but it's a smarter plan than simply lowering the rate and ignoring the problematic tax code.
So now you agree we were right all along.
Damn, all it took to become a good idea was for a (D) to put his stamp on it.
I love the taste of hypocracy in the morning.
mmm
taste like well done toast.
you mean like the idea of individual mandates for health insurance originally being a republican plan, straight out of the heritage foundation, that magically became "socialist" and "unconstitutional" as soon as it no longer had an (R) on it?
that kind of hypocritical?
No, people are for honest tax reform, not cheap election year bait-and-switch political props dressed up as legitimate change.So conservatives were for cutting rates and closing loopholes before they were, now, against them?
lol
Conservatives are centrist.
