JennyFever
Member
Well sure... but then that's the nature of fascism.
So you feel that the 8 points somehow represents that 'the American people trust Obama?' I wonder on what basis you are resting that conclusion?
My bet is that you've nothing which is intellectually sound or logically valid which you'd like to offer as a basis.
I mean to do that, you'd have to show that 'the American people' have some experience with Obama, as experience is the basis of trust... yet Obama has no experience as an executive... What's more, your conclusion would require that 'the American people' as represented by that 8 point majority, would themselves be qualified to make such a judgment; yet that same group elected the very socialists which passed the legislation and signed it into law that caused the catastrophe...
That being so, the question then becomes 'on what basis would someone trust the American people, represented by that 8% majority?'
Perhaps you'll tackle some of that... but you'll forgive me if I don't hold my breath, as I've little trust that such is within your intellectual means.
Although... I would be beyond astounded, if you were to pull it off.
Did Gov. Palin pen this response for you?
1. Citing a poll as a source is a legitimate way to make a point in an argument.
2. What does the American people's experience with Obama have to do with Obama's executive experience? Just because the word "experience" is in both sentences doesn't mean that they make sense together.
3. The American people, qualified or not, are the ones who will be deciding who is the next president, so the majority opinion of Americans is indeed important. Whether or not you trust the majority is irrelevant.