Obama Tells Dems He'll Oppose Tax Cut Deal Without Unemployment Benefits, Other Relie

Rabbi, you DO realize that there are conservatives on unemployment...not just liberals.

So by your own logic, you're calling conservatives lazy bastards for taking the benefits.

I really wish conservatives would get angry when one of their own spews shit like this...and realized that it doesnt comport with R~E~A~L~!~T~Y

Huh?
This isn't about conservatives or liberals on unemployment. It is about an unemployment insurance policy that encourages unemployment and contributes to the problem rather than solving it.
 
Sorry, no, it was some weak opinion piece that couldn't even avoid refuting its own contentions.

Stop insulting our intelligence. This is an adult forum.

Told ya.
You can't counter the message so you attack the messenger.
The piece in fact substantiated, and made clear the issue is well known, my contention that UE insurance actually causes UE.
When you couldn't refute that, you took some unrelated piece and pretended it was the issue under discussion.
When that didnt work you tried to impugn the source.
You are truly a worthless and ugly troll. Now go back under the bridge.

In order to prove that extending UE causes UE:

1. You have to show that a period of unemployment where UE extension was passed was LONGER than a comparable period of UE where UE extension was not passed,

and you then have to

2. show that the UE extension itself, and no other extraneous factors of any kind,

CAUSED the relatively longer period of unemployment, in order to prove that the comparisons were comparable.

That would be proof of cause and effect. Your link did nothing of the sort.

And of ccourse you can't prove causality so none of it is provable. In your small mind anyway.
The economics on this issue is well understood and well agreed on. Except by Leftist illiterates like you.
 
Extend the Bush era tax cuts indefinitely.
Extend unemployment benefits for 16 weeks... to be paid for from repaid stimulus funds
then... get the hell out of the way and let the private sector grow the economy.

The only two people who believe that unemployment benefits will grow the economy are Obama and Pelosi... and he believes it only because she told him so. Pelosi is drunk with power and Obama is a dunce when it comes to economics and fiscal responsibility.
 
Rabbi, you DO realize that there are conservatives on unemployment...not just liberals.

So by your own logic, you're calling conservatives lazy bastards for taking the benefits.

I really wish conservatives would get angry when one of their own spews shit like this...and realized that it doesnt comport with R~E~A~L~!~T~Y

Huh?
This isn't about conservatives or liberals on unemployment. It is about an unemployment insurance policy that encourages unemployment and contributes to the problem rather than solving it.


sure it is. back earlier in the thread you said people on it were bums. and you've chalked it up to a liberal mindset. I really wish that your own kind would see that you're insulting them...and stop listening to people like you.
 
Rabbi, you DO realize that there are conservatives on unemployment...not just liberals.

So by your own logic, you're calling conservatives lazy bastards for taking the benefits.

I really wish conservatives would get angry when one of their own spews shit like this...and realized that it doesnt comport with R~E~A~L~!~T~Y

Huh?
This isn't about conservatives or liberals on unemployment. It is about an unemployment insurance policy that encourages unemployment and contributes to the problem rather than solving it.

...which no one can prove happens.
 
Told ya.
You can't counter the message so you attack the messenger.
The piece in fact substantiated, and made clear the issue is well known, my contention that UE insurance actually causes UE.
When you couldn't refute that, you took some unrelated piece and pretended it was the issue under discussion.
When that didnt work you tried to impugn the source.
You are truly a worthless and ugly troll. Now go back under the bridge.

In order to prove that extending UE causes UE:

1. You have to show that a period of unemployment where UE extension was passed was LONGER than a comparable period of UE where UE extension was not passed,

and you then have to

2. show that the UE extension itself, and no other extraneous factors of any kind,

CAUSED the relatively longer period of unemployment, in order to prove that the comparisons were comparable.

That would be proof of cause and effect. Your link did nothing of the sort.

And of ccourse you can't prove causality so none of it is provable. In your small mind anyway.
The economics on this issue is well understood and well agreed on. Except by Leftist illiterates like you.

Ok, you admit that you can't prove that UE extension causes more UE, but you believe it anyway,

because, of course, you WANT to believe it, you have an irrational, emotional, partisan investment in believing it, your belief is faith based not fact based,

and I"M the illiterate one?

lol, you make it way too easy to have fun here.
 
Now in today's paper I read that this President wants to give tax breaks to people who don't pay taxes?

Is he out of his mind?

The White House is hoping to add breaks for college students and companies that hire the unemployed. They also want to give lower- and middle-class wage earners a tax break, even if they don't make enough to pay taxes to the government.




Senate GOP blocks Dems' bid to ax tax cuts for the rich; showdown could lead to compromise

Remember the bUsh tax cuts? Little known was the Dems lobbied to put in a tax credit if people didnt make any money and paid no taxes. So many people ended up just getting a check from the government, never having paid taxes for the whole year.
This is Democratic Socialism at work. It does nothing to spur the economy and adds to the deficit. But it does get Democrats re-elected, which is its real purpose.

Yeah so which democratic president signed the first EIC bill in 1975?
 
i've know people get unemployemtn benefits over the years. not one of them was happy about it..

You cons crack me up. You think Unemployed = lazy...BS

Although every state might be different in its job search requirements, there are indeed people who will try to game the system by lying about job searches in order to sit around and collect unemployment benefits, either on top of other earnings or they've figured out it's just as easy to collect and also game welfare programs while they're at it. There have and will always be such slobs. The problem is that they are the ones singled out for headlines, which makes it appear that everyone collecting is undeserving, when the vast majority are.

I've now been shocked twice watching two programs (old episodes of "True Life" on MTV) where the characters casually mentioned they were collecting unemployment, one while doing heavy gambling and nothing else, and the other was a shopaholic who, in addition to unemployment, was eligible for Medicaid which was covering her psychiatric care for the "disease" of addictive shopping.

I mean you can only watch so much of that crap, and you just want to SCREAM where is the oversight???!!!! One hopes those kinds of fraudulent situations are the exception, not the rule.
 
Now in today's paper I read that this President wants to give tax breaks to people who don't pay taxes?

Is he out of his mind?

The White House is hoping to add breaks for college students and companies that hire the unemployed. They also want to give lower- and middle-class wage earners a tax break, even if they don't make enough to pay taxes to the government.




Senate GOP blocks Dems' bid to ax tax cuts for the rich; showdown could lead to compromise

Remember the bUsh tax cuts? Little known was the Dems lobbied to put in a tax credit if people didnt make any money and paid no taxes. So many people ended up just getting a check from the government, never having paid taxes for the whole year.
This is Democratic Socialism at work. It does nothing to spur the economy and adds to the deficit. But it does get Democrats re-elected, which is its real purpose.

Such utter bullshit. Provide a link to that or shut the fuck up. Here's a history of the Earned Income Tax Credit, which I presume is what you're talking about. You can scroll down to see a narrative of the spending bills that steadily increased the credit by BOTH Republican and Democratic administrations.

Tax Credit or Income Transfer? by Laurence M. Vance
If Republicans put into practice their campaign rhetoric, then the Republican control of the Congress for the last ten years should have resulted in at least a reduction of the EITC program, if not its outright elimination. Such has not been the case, however, for the program now costs more than the federal AFDC budget, and has even spread to the states. Seventeen states now offer tax credits for "working families" based on the federal EITC.

^^Ya think?!!

If, however, you're talking about tax BRACKETS where 0-$$ equals no tax obligation, that was established when BUSH revised those brackets.

Your constant idiocy in trying to paint Republicans as so fucking innocent has made you one of the biggest laughing stocks on this board.
 
How much will it cost the government to extend unemployment benefits?

How much tax revenue will be as a result of the Bush II tax cuts for billionaires being extended?

Do any of us know?

I don't.

But what I do know is that in both cases, the government will have to BORROW MONEY to pay for BOTH plans.

And one plan, the Republican, will cost some amount.

And the other plan, the Democratic, will cost some amount.

Perhaps it would aid us in evaluating these two plans (that might become part of one compromise) to actually KNOW how much each will cost.

Or are we entirely happy just spewing insults at each other and do we feel that have no need to fully understand what we are talking really about?

Frankly, I'm washing my hands of this one. There's just no way a compromise is possible. Now that it seems Obama has caved and the tax cuts will be extended for even billionnaires, the compounding of the deficit because of it will simply have to be addressed by the 112th Congress. Did Obama have any choice? Apparently not when the Republican forces intent on denying HIM any further wins would rather take this on all by themselves.
 
Obama Tells Dems He'll Oppose Tax Cut Deal Without Unemployment Benefits, Other Relief


My CINC putting his foot down and making the Repugs work and fulfill their end of the bargain to take care of all Americans and not just the wealthy, this is why I voted for him.

So much for bipartisanship and working with the other side.
Not that anyone realistically expected this poseur of a president to do otherwise. He is politically inept, economically illiterate, and socially flawed.

Extending unemployment benefits beyond the already 99 weeks is not "taking care" of anyone. It is making a permanent entitlement not to work. With 9.8% unemployment, unprecedented at this stage of any recovery, one would think Obama would be looking for a game changer rather than more of the same.

This coming from an idiot who supports a party that has said its sole intention is to remove Obama from office in 2012 without expressing any true intention of helping the American people as well as drafting a plan to block every bill proposed by Democrats, don't even talk that bipartisanship talk.



There is absolutely no support for the idea that people receiving unemployment benefits don't want to work, thats typical Republitard political claptrap than cannot be proven, yet is frequently spewed. If unemployment was shrinking and these people still didn't have a job you might be able to make such an argument but with it rising its even more retarded to make the argument that these people are lazy.

The claim that in 99 weeks "anyone can find a job" isn't necessarily true either. The thinking that a person with an engineering degree and 20 years of experience can apply at McDonalds and get hired is ludicrous. That employer would KNOW the person would be out the door as soon as something better came along, and would hire the person who would stay awhile. Hello?

Then there are positions advertised that result in hundreds of people applying for ONE job. The Idiot Brigade is alive and well as long as there is still the irrational thinking of morons like Rabbi who thinks he sounds brilliant by lumping several million unemployed people into his neat little box.
 
With unemployment rising how can anyone continue to support the 2 year failure that is Obamanomics?

Dems: they so loved the unemployed, they want every American to become one.

Two words: We Won. So you Keynesian fuckheads and Obama Fluffers get to the back of the bus

How happy that you won will you be when nothing changes? Or it gets worse? Oops, nevermind--you'll have Obama to blame, even though he's basically giving YOU (Republicans) the chance to show how big your own balls are.

I wonder how much time the angry populace will give this new batch of problem solvers? The first 100 days? A year? Hmmm, beginning next summer, the House members are all gonna have to start gearing up to campaign for reelection...again.
 
Obama Tells Dems He'll Oppose Tax Cut Deal Without Unemployment Benefits, Other Relief


My CINC putting his foot down and making the Repugs work and fulfill their end of the bargain to take care of all Americans and not just the wealthy, this is why I voted for him.

It is not the role of Government to 'take care of' anyone. You voted for him because you're an idiot who doesn't understand the Constitution that you are sworn to defend.... which is not surprising since you actually think you're 'defending Americans'.

I'm seriously considering supporting Palin for President.... just so I can watch your head explode when she becomes your CINC. That would be some funny shit. :lol:

Interesting, though, that the Constitution was amended to remove the impression that only wealthy property owners were deserving of anything. What was that all about if not an admission that fair treatment for ALL Americans should be the rule of law?
 
UIE0.gif
 
So much for bipartisanship and working with the other side.
Not that anyone realistically expected this poseur of a president to do otherwise. He is politically inept, economically illiterate, and socially flawed.

Extending unemployment benefits beyond the already 99 weeks is not "taking care" of anyone. It is making a permanent entitlement not to work. With 9.8% unemployment, unprecedented at this stage of any recovery, one would think Obama would be looking for a game changer rather than more of the same.

This coming from an idiot who supports a party that has said its sole intention is to remove Obama from office in 2012 without expressing any true intention of helping the American people as well as drafting a plan to block every bill proposed by Democrats, don't even talk that bipartisanship talk.



There is absolutely no support for the idea that people receiving unemployment benefits don't want to work, thats typical Republitard political claptrap than cannot be proven, yet is frequently spewed. If unemployment was shrinking and these people still didn't have a job you might be able to make such an argument but with it rising its even more retarded to make the argument that these people are lazy.

The claim that in 99 weeks "anyone can find a job" isn't necessarily true either. The thinking that a person with an engineering degree and 20 years of experience can apply at McDonalds and get hired is ludicrous. That employer would KNOW the person would be out the door as soon as something better came along, and would hire the person who would stay awhile. Hello?

Then there are positions advertised that result in hundreds of people applying for ONE job. The Idiot Brigade is alive and well as long as there is still the irrational thinking of morons like Rabbi who thinks he sounds brilliant by lumping several million unemployed people into his neat little box.

I've never known anyone in my 50 years who was unemployed for nearly 2 fucking years that didn't want tyo be unemployed nearly 2 fucking years.
 
You gotta love the right. Nothing ever counter-intuitive penetrates their skull.
 
i've know people get unemployemtn benefits over the years. not one of them was happy about it..

You cons crack me up. You think Unemployed = lazy...BS

Aww those poor unemployed people, sitting year after year living off the dole. We ought to feel bad for them as we give them money month after month. I guess money isn't enough anymore. They need a hug too.

Hey, here's a newsflash: No one is responsible to pay your bills except you. Now get off your fat lazy ass and go get a job.

You are beyond stupid...you do realise there is something like one job for every five people at the moment (if not more)... IOW - I'll say it real slow for you - Even if EVERY person on the 'dole' wants a job there isn't one for them. Understand? Prolly not, because you're dumb as a post.

You didn't even address my point. You are so stupid you think Unemployed = Lazy...it doesn't...
 
i've know people get unemployemtn benefits over the years. not one of them was happy about it..

You cons crack me up. You think Unemployed = lazy...BS

Aww those poor unemployed people, sitting year after year living off the dole. We ought to feel bad for them as we give them money month after month. I guess money isn't enough anymore. They need a hug too.

Hey, here's a newsflash: No one is responsible to pay your bills except you. Now get off your fat lazy ass and go get a job.

You are beyond stupid...you do realise there is something like one job for every five people at the moment (if not more)... IOW - I'll say it real slow for you - Even if EVERY person on the 'dole' wants a job there isn't one for them. Understand? Prolly not, because you're dumb as a post.

You didn't even address my point. You are so stupid you think Unemployed = Lazy...it doesn't...

I realize in your little leftist world jobs are like Old Master paintings: there are only a limited number of them.
But in the real world, beyond Eurosclerosis, there are an infinite number of jobs over any given time period. I realize that concept is probably way beyond you so don't bother responding.
 

Forum List

Back
Top