Obama’s Truth Teams: ‘Fight Back, Report an Attack’

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
70,230
10,864
2,040
links and the form Obama has for turning people in on site

SNIP:
Posted on May 26, 2012 at 11:23pm by Erica Ritz


Back in February, The Blaze reported on Obama’s “Truth Teams,” described on the official site as “a network of [President Obama's] supporters who are committed to responding to unfounded attacks and defending the President’s record.”

“When you’re faced with someone who misrepresents the truth, you can find all the facts you need right here—along with ways to share the message with whoever needs to hear it,” the site continues.

(Related: Obama Campaign Launches ‘Truth Teams’)

However, after consistent ridicule (particularly over the “Attack Watch” section of the site), the Truth Teams started flying lower on the political radar.

Now, it seems, they are re-joining the fray.


read it all here.
Obama’s Truth Teams: ‘Fight Back, Report an Attack’ | Jake Tapper: ‘Conflates Smears With Criticisms’ | TheBlaze.com
 
Nothing about turning people in. The Obama campaign is giving resources to its supporters to use against what they perceive as unfounded or factually inaccurate criticisms of its opponents; and this is bad in what way?
 
Nothing about turning people in. The Obama campaign is giving resources to its supporters to use against what they perceive as unfounded or factually inaccurate criticisms of its opponents; and this is bad in what way?

ummm humm..
then why do they ask, where did you hear and SEE THIS?
 
Last edited:
I don't really see the big deal.

The obama mind slaves are easy to spot here and will be gone when the election season is over.

Only joeb has survived more than a week, so I'm not all that concerned.
 
I've never seen something like this from any President against it's own citizens they supposedly REPRESENT..
 
Last edited:
links and the form Obama has for turning people in on site

SNIP:
Posted on May 26, 2012 at 11:23pm by Erica Ritz


Back in February, The Blaze reported on Obama’s “Truth Teams,” described on the official site as “a network of [President Obama's] supporters who are committed to responding to unfounded attacks and defending the President’s record.”

“When you’re faced with someone who misrepresents the truth, you can find all the facts you need right here—along with ways to share the message with whoever needs to hear it,” the site continues.

(Related: Obama Campaign Launches ‘Truth Teams’)

However, after consistent ridicule (particularly over the “Attack Watch” section of the site), the Truth Teams started flying lower on the political radar.

Now, it seems, they are re-joining the fray.


read it all here.
Obama’s Truth Teams: ‘Fight Back, Report an Attack’ | Jake Tapper: ‘Conflates Smears With Criticisms’ | TheBlaze.com

obama_1984_poster-r700e79dbf7bc44c1bb97573c2f9c2269_wad_400.jpg
 
Aside from the hypocrisy of the Obama campaign saying things like, “fight back” and “attack” after ceaselessly criticizing Sarah Palin for almost identical language, Jake Tapper is reporting that the email “conflates smears with criticisms” by citing a largely debunked study at the outset.

Obama is the worst president in history. Remember he pushed the same thing early on? You could write to [email protected] if you heard anything critical of the president.
This is what marxist dictators do. Any dictators, actually. Next he'll want to control internet content.
 
Aside from the hypocrisy of the Obama campaign saying things like, “fight back” and “attack” after ceaselessly criticizing Sarah Palin for almost identical language, Jake Tapper is reporting that the email “conflates smears with criticisms” by citing a largely debunked study at the outset.

Obama is the worst president in history. Remember he pushed the same thing early on? You could write to [email protected] if you heard anything critical of the president.
This is what marxist dictators do. Any dictators, actually. Next he'll want to control internet content.

Nope. President Bush was the worst in modern times. In order to debunk ridiculous claims the Whitehouse must know about the claims. It is well within the 1st amendent rights for Americans. Marxist Dictators are much more ruthless in their efforts to limit the pubication of oppostion material. Publishing counter claims in not part of the Marxist Dictator handbook.

As a Marxist he sucks. Or.........he's not a Marxist at all!
 
Aside from the hypocrisy of the Obama campaign saying things like, “fight back” and “attack” after ceaselessly criticizing Sarah Palin for almost identical language, Jake Tapper is reporting that the email “conflates smears with criticisms” by citing a largely debunked study at the outset.

Obama is the worst president in history. Remember he pushed the same thing early on? You could write to [email protected] if you heard anything critical of the president.
This is what marxist dictators do. Any dictators, actually. Next he'll want to control internet content.

Nope. President Bush was the worst in modern times. In order to debunk ridiculous claims the Whitehouse must know about the claims. It is well within the 1st amendent rights for Americans. Marxist Dictators are much more ruthless in their efforts to limit the pubication of oppostion material. Publishing counter claims in not part of the Marxist Dictator handbook.

As a Marxist he sucks. Or.........he's not a Marxist at all!

Bush didnt preside over a lowest unemployment rate of 7.8%, the day he took office. He didnt preside over the first credit downgrade. He didnt preside over a fruitless war in Afghanistan. And he didnt assassinate Americans.
You think the White House does not have people monitoring the internet and news sources? You think they ahve to rely on individuals?
How much information are you comfortable with the White House having about you, that they can call "inaccurate" and then smear you in the press?
And who said Obama was a Marxist? Must have been you.
 
links and the form Obama has for turning people in on site

SNIP:
Posted on May 26, 2012 at 11:23pm by Erica Ritz


Back in February, The Blaze reported on Obama’s “Truth Teams,” described on the official site as “a network of [President Obama's] supporters who are committed to responding to unfounded attacks and defending the President’s record.”

“When you’re faced with someone who misrepresents the truth, you can find all the facts you need right here—along with ways to share the message with whoever needs to hear it,” the site continues.

(Related: Obama Campaign Launches ‘Truth Teams’)

However, after consistent ridicule (particularly over the “Attack Watch” section of the site), the Truth Teams started flying lower on the political radar.

Now, it seems, they are re-joining the fray.


read it all here.
Obama’s Truth Teams: ‘Fight Back, Report an Attack’ | Jake Tapper: ‘Conflates Smears With Criticisms’ | TheBlaze.com

You know everything an administration has to say is bullshit when they feel the need to have a "truth team."

It really goes to show how dumb Obama thinks the majority of US citizens are and how desperate he actually is.
 
ummm humm..
then why do they ask, where did you hear and SEE THIS?
Hmm! And this may explain why I get troll-raided, by off-topic Democrats, when I post non-partisan information.

Democrats have taken over the dirty tricks tactics, in recent years, despite Watergate. Democrats infiltrated Nader 2004, to suppress the signature drive, and they sued Nader 2004, to keep Ralph off ballots.

8 OWS occupations report Democrats attempted to co-opt the occupation, according to an article, by Kevin Zeese and Dr.Margaret Flowers, of OWS. The Ds are getting like zombies.
 
I think that this is a good thing for Obama's opponents. It's like he's giving us the playbook. I intend to check it out and look into the "facts" as they call them. that way I can counter the spin that the Obama Kool Aide drinkers try to throw at me.
 
Obama is the worst president in history. Remember he pushed the same thing early on? You could write to [email protected] if you heard anything critical of the president.
This is what marxist dictators do. Any dictators, actually. Next he'll want to control internet content.

Nope. President Bush was the worst in modern times. In order to debunk ridiculous claims the Whitehouse must know about the claims. It is well within the 1st amendent rights for Americans. Marxist Dictators are much more ruthless in their efforts to limit the pubication of oppostion material. Publishing counter claims in not part of the Marxist Dictator handbook.

As a Marxist he sucks. Or.........he's not a Marxist at all!

Bush didnt preside over a lowest unemployment rate of 7.8%, the day he took office. He didnt preside over the first credit downgrade. He didnt preside over a fruitless war in Afghanistan. And he didnt assassinate Americans.
You think the White House does not have people monitoring the internet and news sources? You think they ahve to rely on individuals?
How much information are you comfortable with the White House having about you, that they can call "inaccurate" and then smear you in the press?
And who said Obama was a Marxist? Must have been you.

Thank for providing convincing evidence that the Bush years were some of the worst for the country. Thank God, the Baby Jesus, and the wholey Ghost for sending a man like Obama to fix up his mess.

They should have gotten a warrent to kill that POS traitor. Furthermore if they are going to target a specific individual who is a citizen traitor in the future I think they need legal justification.

They can have complete access to my online life, quotes and all.

Your claim was that gathering information is what Marxist dicators do.
 
Obama is a Neo-Marxist. Classic Marxism is a non-starter in the USA, so they had to rebrand, still the same 100% Fail Product, just with fancy new packaging
 
Nope. President Bush was the worst in modern times. In order to debunk ridiculous claims the Whitehouse must know about the claims. It is well within the 1st amendent rights for Americans. Marxist Dictators are much more ruthless in their efforts to limit the pubication of oppostion material. Publishing counter claims in not part of the Marxist Dictator handbook.

As a Marxist he sucks. Or.........he's not a Marxist at all!

Bush didnt preside over a lowest unemployment rate of 7.8%, the day he took office. He didnt preside over the first credit downgrade. He didnt preside over a fruitless war in Afghanistan. And he didnt assassinate Americans.
You think the White House does not have people monitoring the internet and news sources? You think they ahve to rely on individuals?
How much information are you comfortable with the White House having about you, that they can call "inaccurate" and then smear you in the press?
And who said Obama was a Marxist? Must have been you.

Thank for providing convincing evidence that the Bush years were some of the worst for the country. Thank God, the Baby Jesus, and the wholey Ghost for sending a man like Obama to fix up his mess.

They should have gotten a warrent to kill that POS traitor. Furthermore if they are going to target a specific individual who is a citizen traitor in the future I think they need legal justification.

They can have complete access to my online life, quotes and all.

Your claim was that gathering information is what Marxist dicators do.

Do you get discounts on Obama knee pads if you buy them by the case, like you do?
 

Forum List

Back
Top