Good stuff, thanks.My premise is that both ends of the political spectrum are trying to make the current economic situation out to be something that it is not.That's not traditional congressional discretionary spending. That's allowing the Fed broad powers. Carte Blanche. Congress most likely couldn't have stopped it.The purse strings of the government was controlled by the GOP controlled House. How did Obama do all that supposedly {discretionary?) spending without their approval?Good gawd, another one who thinks the stock market is the economy. It is not. Not today, not during Obama.
The rate of job growth under Obama was certainly going to be higher, given the dire situation he was handed, which was a fucking mess.
We'll never know what Obama would have done with a more normal economy. As it is, the only thing he did here was stand back and allow the Federal Reserve to pump over FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS into markets.
Just more partisan noise.
.
Plus, and probably just as likely, given the magnitude of the problem, they probably knew there weren't many other choices.
And doing so probably would have looked bad politically, since a member of their own party had just left the White House with the economy in collapse. So for the most part, they kept their yaps shut.
.
You premise isn't very clear
As usual.
.
.