Obama, low in polls, Carter, smiling- won't be remembered as the pariah of Dem Party

[Neotrotsky]

Obama, low in polls, Carter, smiling- won't be remembered as the pariah of Democratic Party


At least Jimmy Carter can smile now. Papa Obama has a worst end of First year approval than he did.



USA

Jimmy Carter at 57% approval rating end of First year

Papa Obama at 49% approval rating end of First year






Of course, in a strange way it is all starting to look "familiar"
But on steroids

​

 

[Modbert]

Another Obama approval rating thread?

 

[Neotrotsky]

Another Obama approval rating thread?

There are so many ways and angles to work it these numbers.
Being Xmas, I thought it could make Carter happy

When I see these stats, it reminds me of this song





[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVS3WNt7yRU[/ame]

Merry Xmas

 

[Modbert]

I figured it'd be easier just to make all into one thread. Then people such as yourself can have a single echo masturbation room instead of taking up various threads on the board.

Merry Xmas to you as well.

 

[Neotrotsky]

I figured it'd be easier just to make all into one thread. Then people such as yourself can have a single echo masturbation room instead of taking up various threads on the board.

Merry Xmas to you as well.

Of course you are free not to read it and then people like you can masturbate elsewhere to pics of the One in peace.





We are not a total socialist state yet where you are forced to do things




Oh and a Happy New Year
Let's hope the next one is even better

 

[Avatar4321]

I dont really care about polls. Besides, Carter didnt really start getting bad till later in his administration.

 

[Neotrotsky]

I dont really care about polls. Besides, Carter didnt really start getting bad till later in his administration.

I agree that the only poll that counts is on election day

But
the politicians; msm; live and die by these things


They do provide as well "fodder" for bloggers/posters

If Papa Obama has up days then the left will
repay in kind

 

[Avatar4321]

Thats because the bloggers/posters need to get a life and deal with the actual world around us. We have enough problems to deal with without creating news with polls. The media is just lazy.

 

[jillian]

Jimmy Carter at 57% approval rating end of First year

Papa Obama at 49% approval rating end of First year

Er..... you might actually want to check your facts, wingnutter....instead of listening to karl rove's spin machine...which, as usual, lies by omission of pertinent facts.

Obama's tied with RONALD REAGAN for poll rating at the end of the first year. He had 49%, too. Maybe it's looking familiar in a way that's going to tick you off big time.

PolitiFact | Rove says Obama's approval ratings after a year are worst of any president

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama, low in polls, Carter, smiling- won't be remembered as the pariah of Democratic Party


At least Jimmy Carter can smile now. Papa Obama has a worst end of First year approval than he did.



USA

Jimmy Carter at 57% approval rating end of First year

Papa Obama at 49% approval rating end of First year






Of course, in a strange way it is all starting to look "familiar"
But on steroids

​

Jimmy used to tell us to cut back...he also cut back himself to set an example. All he did was depress America.

Obama isn't making the same mistake. He started off telling us to cut back but now he's claiming everything is getting better while he parties his ass off.

 

[mudwhistle]

I dont really care about polls. Besides, Carter didnt really start getting bad till later in his administration.

Yes...it took him longer to screw everything up.

Also...I don't think he intended on screwing everything up like Obama does.

 

[mudwhistle]

Jimmy Carter at 57% approval rating end of First year

Papa Obama at 49% approval rating end of First year

Er..... you might actually want to check your facts, wingnutter....instead of listening to karl rove's spin machine...which, as usual, lies by omission of pertinent facts.

Obama's tied with RONALD REAGAN for poll rating at the end of the first year. He had 49%, too. Maybe it's looking familiar in a way that's going to tick you off big time.

PolitiFact | Rove says Obama's approval ratings after a year are worst of any president

That's the State Run USAToday poll at 49%.

NBC.... another state run media source.....says 47% .

An independent source Quinnipiac University Poll dated Dec. 15th says 46%

I guess it depends on whom you choose to believe. It also depends on whether the polster loaded the sampling with folks from Democrat districts.

Everyone is bitching about this guy....even the die-hard Democrats at work. I wonder how many of the 46-49% that claimed to approve lied and really just didn't want to say out loud they don't like what's going on.

Quinnipiac University Poll. Dec. 15-20, 2009. N=1,616 registered voters nationwide. MoE ± 2.4.


"Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president?"

12/15-20/09..........46% Approve.........43% Disapprove.........11% Unsure
Obama: Job Ratings (1)

 

[jillian]

The point, weirdo, is that Reagan's were low at this point,too.

That's what happens when a new president has a lot on his plate.

and you might want to consider that a lot of dissatisfaction is with people on the LEFT...not the right (which has remained pretty much the same) because he hasn't gone far enough or been tough enough on you wingnuts.

And THOSE people aren't voting for you guys come 2012.

So, once again...

your point is irrelevant.

 

[asaratis]

I figured it'd be easier just to make all into one thread. Then people such as yourself can have a single echo masturbation room instead of taking up various threads on the board.

Merry Xmas to you as well.

What's the matter? Are you upset by the repetitive reminders that the Boy King is failing to impress the populace?

The main difference between Carter and Obama is that Carter unintentionally screwed up just from being incompetent and appeasing...Obama is deliberate and lied about his intentions during the campaign. Obama is a worthless Marxist...and so is his wife.

 

[asaratis]

The point, weirdo, is that Reagan's were low at this point,too.

That's what happens when a new president has a lot on his plate.

and you might want to consider that a lot of dissatisfaction is with people on the LEFT...not the right (which has remained pretty much the same) because he hasn't gone far enough or been tough enough on you wingnuts.

And THOSE people aren't voting for you guys come 2012.

So, once again...

your point is irrelevant.

Nay, nay! Those on the left that are upset with their poster boy are bemoaning the fact that he went a lot further than they thought he would. He wants more government control of their lives than they envisioned when the utopia was being sold to them.

Hopefully, this will disable him from winning a second term.

 

[jillian]

I'm never one for making predictions years out. But I would say it hinges on two factors -- one: where is the economy in 2012? and two: who is going to be running against him.

Really simple.

But insofar as 'the left' is concerned. They have no one else to vote for.

I'm never sure what exactly "left" means, though.

 

[code1211]

The point, weirdo, is that Reagan's were low at this point,too.

That's what happens when a new president has a lot on his plate.

and you might want to consider that a lot of dissatisfaction is with people on the LEFT...not the right (which has remained pretty much the same) because he hasn't gone far enough or been tough enough on you wingnuts.

And THOSE people aren't voting for you guys come 2012.
So, once again...

your point is irrelevant.

The elections pretty much are decided by the independant voter. About 30% will vote for their party no matter how bad they have become. So 60% of the vote is not up for grabs.

The 40% who think about it and make a choice based on the situation are the ones that decide the outcomes. Right now, the Big Govertnment approach of the Big 0 is starting to scare many in the country.

Right now, from a strictly electability stand point, the Republicans are now where the Dems were a year ago. Pretty impressive swing, huh?

Generic Congressional Ballot - Rasmussen Reports™

Since late June, support for Republican candidates on the Generic Ballot has ranged from 41% to 44%, while support for Democrats has run from 36% to 40%. Looking back a year ago, the two parties were in a much different place. Throughout the fall and winter of 2008, support for Democratic congressional candidates ranged from 42% to 47%. Republican support ranged from 37% to 41%.

Sixty-six percent (66%) of voters prefer a smaller government with fewer services and lower taxes over a more active government with more services and higher taxes, the second highest finding of the year.

 

[Neotrotsky]

The point, weirdo, is that Reagan's were low at this point,too.

That's what happens when a new president has a lot on his plate.

and you might want to consider that a lot of dissatisfaction is with people on the LEFT...not the right (which has remained pretty much the same) because he hasn't gone far enough or been tough enough on you wingnuts.

And THOSE people aren't voting for you guys come 2012.

So, once again...

your point is irrelevant.

In the words/ spirit of Lloyd Bentsen

"I knew Ronald Reagan, Ronald Reagan was a friend of mine"

Mr Obama you're no Ronald Reagan




Plus Reagan's policies were more pro growth

What might work in the left's advantage-so far

They delayed a lot of the anti growth stuff till the next election and spent money

The goal being - lets not mess up the economy too bad until the after the next election

Of if this Health care bull gets signed into law- it will tend to be a job killer

 

[mudwhistle]

The point, weirdo, is that Reagan's were low at this point,too.

That's what happens when a new president has a lot on his plate.

and you might want to consider that a lot of dissatisfaction is with people on the LEFT...not the right (which has remained pretty much the same) because he hasn't gone far enough or been tough enough on you wingnuts.

And THOSE people aren't voting for you guys come 2012.

So, once again...

your point is irrelevant.

Reagan was a target of the press when he entered office. As hard as they tried Reagan won the hearts of Most of America despite the extreme efforts of the leftist dominated press.

Obama on the other hand has been the beneficiary of unbelievably supportive press...to the point that they appear to slobber over every word he utters.....and still the American people can see...and more and more of them see every single day....that's he's full of shit.

I think it's important to like a president as a person. People liked Ronald Reagan.....I can't say the same for Obama.

 

[Neotrotsky]

The point, weirdo, is that Reagan's were low at this point,too.

That's what happens when a new president has a lot on his plate.

and you might want to consider that a lot of dissatisfaction is with people on the LEFT...not the right (which has remained pretty much the same) because he hasn't gone far enough or been tough enough on you wingnuts.

And THOSE people aren't voting for you guys come 2012.

So, once again...

your point is irrelevant.

Reagan was a target of the press when he entered office. As hard as they tried Reagan won the hearts of Most of America despite the extreme efforts of the leftist dominated press.

Obama on the other hand has been the beneficiary of unbelievably supportive press...to the point that they appear to slobber over every word he utters.....and still the American people can see...and more and more of them see every single day....that's he's full of shit.

I think it's important to like a president as a person. People liked Ronald Reagan.....I can't say the same for Obama.

I was a kid but I do remember the MSM saying well Reagan is old and Bush can take over when he dies