Obama in 1995...telling us "Gotta have them ribs and p*ssy too!"

Where is Obama's apology?
Ask the author of the book he was reading
I did! Obama was reading it from his autobiography if you WATCHED the video!
A professionally shot video of Barack Obama from 1995 has recently surfaced. Shot at the Cambridge, Mass. Public Library, the video captures a skinny, youthful Obama promoting his then newly released memoir, Dreams from My Father.

In this hour-long presentation, Obama openly talks about his relationship with his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist and pornographer. Perhaps more importantly, Obama gives us a much clearer picture of who he was in 1995, on the cusp of his political career, than we had seen before. Some observations:





Read more: Articles: What the Unearthed 1995 Video Tells Us about Obama
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
 
Why don't you just provide the context of what he was reading

We already know the context of what Trump said
 


I think so much more of bath house barry after seeing this? Don't you? I suppose it's not just Trump who likes pussy now, huh? LOL! Maybe he is the man of the family after all!

We have the most hypocritical media that has ever been. I wonder how many of the crying liberal scum bought 50 shades of grey when it came out.
 
Why don't you just provide the context of what he was reading

We already know the context of what Trump said
Since WHEN do you care about "context"? Words matter don't they?
PLUS how many millions have READ Obama's book and NOT been offended?
But let two men bantering OFF MIC make some crude remarks and people like you spread it like gossip among a group of clucking hens!
If "pussy" was such a bad word why did let Jon Stewart use it all the time?
You say the word “pussy.”

Before you label me a Jezebel-reading, hyper-sensitive feminist freakazoid, let’s analyze how you're using the word. During your newscast, what are you implying as you refer to a particular man as a “pussy”? Are you referring to him as a cat or a fuzzy catkin of the pussy willow? Or is it your way of telling the man he’s a vulva? Hmmm … you're super smart, Jon, like a really bright guy, so let me look further down the free dictionary’sdefinition to decipher what you really mean when you freely toss this word around.Dear Jon Stewart: Stop Using the Word Pussy. Thanks.
 
Huh.....this wasn't important to the msm for some reason....

Alert Fux News, Drudge, Breitbart.
You mean non msm news....

I'm not quite sure how a network or outlet can on the one hand brag about it's numbers and on the other proclaim to be outside the "MSM" [shudder], but I guess if your demorgaphic target is mostly uninformed and emotionally irrational anything will sell without being questioned.
 
Huh.....this wasn't important to the msm for some reason....

Alert Fux News, Drudge, Breitbart.
You mean non msm news....

I'm not quite sure how a network or outlet can on the one hand brag about it's numbers and on the other proclaim to be outside the "MSM" [shudder], but I guess if your demorgaphic target is mostly uninformed and emotionally irrational anything will sell without being questioned.
Msm = liberal propaganda


You wouldn't understand.....
 
Huh.....this wasn't important to the msm for some reason....

Alert Fux News, Drudge, Breitbart.
You mean non msm news....

I'm not quite sure how a network or outlet can on the one hand brag about it's numbers and on the other proclaim to be outside the "MSM" [shudder], but I guess if your demorgaphic target is mostly uninformed and emotionally irrational anything will sell without being questioned.
Msm = liberal propaganda


You wouldn't understand.....

Oh I know what you meant, you're just wrong again. Anything you wish not to confront is "liberal". Your "MSM" is a direct result of Clinton's deregulation of the FCC which allowed us to go from having 50 some odd companies involved in the US media machine back in the 1980s to 6 major multinational corporations controlling the narrative today. What you're bemoaning is deregulation and the resultant concentration of corporate power, but your emotional state and belief system retard your awareness.
 
So here we have Obama writing in his autobiography and then reading to an audience the following words...
"Gotta have them ribs and p*ssy too!"

So not only does he have the audience listen to this crap,,, BUT HE ORDERS the following copies of his book "Dreams from My Father" purchased with OUR TAX dollars!
WHERE is the MSM on this? Didn't Obama then get royalties off the books the State Department bought with OUR TAX dollars????


The State Department has bought more than $70,000 worth of books authored by President Obama, sending out copies as Christmas gratuities and stocking “key libraries” around the world with “Dreams From My Father” more than a decade after its release.

The U.S. Embassy in Egypt, for instance, spent $28,636 in August 2009 for copies of Mr. Obama’s best-selling 1995 memoir. Six weeks earlier, the embassy had placed another order for the same book for more than $9,000, federal purchasing records show.

About the same time, halfway around the world, the U.S. Embassy in South Korea had the same idea and spent more than $6,000 for copies of “Dreams From My Father.”

One month later, the U.S. Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia, spent more than $3,800 for hardcover copies of the Indonesian version of Mr. Obama’s “The Audacity of Hope,” records show.

A review of the expenditures in a federal database did not reveal any examples of State Department purchases of books by former Presidents George W. Bush or Bill Clinton. The purchases of Mr. Obama’s literary work mostly, but not always, took place in the months after Mr. Obama captured the White House.
State Dept. spends $70K on Obama books
 
Huh.....this wasn't important to the msm for some reason....

Alert Fux News, Drudge, Breitbart.
You mean non msm news....

I'm not quite sure how a network or outlet can on the one hand brag about it's numbers and on the other proclaim to be outside the "MSM" [shudder], but I guess if your demorgaphic target is mostly uninformed and emotionally irrational anything will sell without being questioned.
Msm = liberal propaganda


You wouldn't understand.....

Oh I know what you meant, you're just wrong again. Anything you wish not to confront is "liberal". Your "MSM" is a direct result of Clinton's deregulation of the FCC which allowed us to go from having 50 some odd companies involved in the US media machine back in the 1980s to 6 major multinational corporations controlling the narrative today. What you're bemoaning is deregulation and the resultant concentration of corporate power, but your emotional state and belief system retard your awareness.


NO... the MSM is comprised of people like I knew when I was taking journalism courses in the 60s at a Big Ten university.
These now editors/producers of news were members of the SDS and I am sure you don't have any idea what that organization is to our history!
Let's say a direct link from the SDS to Obama to the biased MSM can be shown and these same idiots that pretend to be "professional journalists" are so
biased they gave 85% of their donations to Obama in 2008! They bias their news to such degree that less then
trustinMSM.png


Exhibit 1-1: The Media Elite
 
Alert Fux News, Drudge, Breitbart.
You mean non msm news....

I'm not quite sure how a network or outlet can on the one hand brag about it's numbers and on the other proclaim to be outside the "MSM" [shudder], but I guess if your demorgaphic target is mostly uninformed and emotionally irrational anything will sell without being questioned.
Msm = liberal propaganda


You wouldn't understand.....

Oh I know what you meant, you're just wrong again. Anything you wish not to confront is "liberal". Your "MSM" is a direct result of Clinton's deregulation of the FCC which allowed us to go from having 50 some odd companies involved in the US media machine back in the 1980s to 6 major multinational corporations controlling the narrative today. What you're bemoaning is deregulation and the resultant concentration of corporate power, but your emotional state and belief system retard your awareness.


NO... the MSM is comprised of people like I knew when I was taking journalism courses in the 60s at a Big Ten university.
These now editors/producers of news were members of the SDS and I am sure you don't have any idea what that organization is to our history!
Let's say a direct link from the SDS to Obama to the biased MSM can be shown and these same idiots that pretend to be "professional journalists" are so
biased they gave 85% of their donations to Obama in 2008! They bias their news to such degree that less then
View attachment 92800

Exhibit 1-1: The Media Elite
It stares plantation dwellers like FENTON LUM in the face yet they are educated to never confront it and will defend it to the end of America.....
 
You mean non msm news....

I'm not quite sure how a network or outlet can on the one hand brag about it's numbers and on the other proclaim to be outside the "MSM" [shudder], but I guess if your demorgaphic target is mostly uninformed and emotionally irrational anything will sell without being questioned.
Msm = liberal propaganda


You wouldn't understand.....

Oh I know what you meant, you're just wrong again. Anything you wish not to confront is "liberal". Your "MSM" is a direct result of Clinton's deregulation of the FCC which allowed us to go from having 50 some odd companies involved in the US media machine back in the 1980s to 6 major multinational corporations controlling the narrative today. What you're bemoaning is deregulation and the resultant concentration of corporate power, but your emotional state and belief system retard your awareness.


NO... the MSM is comprised of people like I knew when I was taking journalism courses in the 60s at a Big Ten university.
These now editors/producers of news were members of the SDS and I am sure you don't have any idea what that organization is to our history!
Let's say a direct link from the SDS to Obama to the biased MSM can be shown and these same idiots that pretend to be "professional journalists" are so
biased they gave 85% of their donations to Obama in 2008! They bias their news to such degree that less then
View attachment 92800

Exhibit 1-1: The Media Elite
It stares plantation dwellers like FENTON LUM in the face yet they are educated to never confront it and will defend it to the end of America.....

You're just wrong again. Anything you wish not to confront is "liberal". Your "MSM" is a direct result of Clinton's deregulation of the FCC which allowed us to go from having 50 some odd companies involved in the US media machine back in the 1980s to 6 major multinational corporations controlling the narrative today. What you're bemoaning is deregulation and the resultant concentration of corporate power, but your emotional state and belief system retard your awareness.
 

Forum List

Back
Top