I amso IR
"Well Yea, Duh"!
- Jul 11, 2015
- 1,189
- 166
- 140
- Banned
- #161
Sure alot of babbling to just say the obvious that the United States can hit and nuke any target on earth in secondsBasically what i'm hearing from rabid Trump-Hater Democrats, is that he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He supposedly turns away the 'armada' and avoids all-out War, and they're bitterly angry about that. But if he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll be bitterly angry about that too.
So, Democrats are simply full of shite in the end. They're just playing the old tired 'Party before Country' game. They just want the power back. And they're willing to say or do anything to get it back. They're gonna savagely attack Trump no matter what he does. They're very shallow hateful folks. It is what it is.
Trump didn't turn back the "armada". He never sent one in the first place.
So now Trump don't have three carrier groups headed for NK?
What do you think pretend military guy that ships can cover thousands of miles in a hour now?
.
As we say in the Army, "it all depends on the situation and terrain." Now I have to admit that when it was announced the Carrier Group was still headed south on the other side of the equator, I began to feel somewhat uneasy. Some how that seems like unfavorable terrain and combine that with being south of the equator, perhaps not the best situation. I am not certain if a Carrier Group has a long range missile capability or not. How about it all you "anchor clankers" does a Carrier Group have a three thousand mile mlissile capability on any of it's ships or subs? If so, North Korea is no problem from south of the equator. If not, aw shucks! I do know this however, if you intend to engage a ground target with artillery and you are more than 25 miles from from that target, perhaps you should move a tad closer than 25 miles, when using a long range artillery battery such as the 8 inch gun. And then it would be nice to have Sneaky Pete close enough to lase or "paint" the target so the fuse can detect and guide the projectile to that target. Any thing less is outdated and soooo yesterday. Artillery saturation is costly and ineffective and precision is so much the big event. Collateral damage gives the press and liberal factions something to bitch about and raise hell about, like it really matters? Were it that important, there would be no war, anywhere. Just my Army mind unfolding here.
Anything to assist your non-military mind not to mention, loss to the Dolphins along, Bear513. I also was mistakenly a huge Bear fan back in the day. The difference between us, I suppose, is I like winners which the Bears fail to do on a consistent basis and the Bronco's have been doing on a more consistent basis. You are spot on with the the "from any point on earth" view however. If one is capable of putting something somewhere, in this day and age, then it stands to reason one the has the ability to put something from "there" to a location elsewhere. I simply do not know if the United States Navy is equipped to do that at this point. The US Army developed that ability back in the 1960's and were on track to becoming very good at it until the US AIr Force cried foul and the Congress listened and accepted what the AF said as soothe. ICBM's the Congress decided do in fact belong to the Air Force, a fact which they, the AF, has now tired of some years later and wishes would be the boondoggle of the US Army. That further illustrates the "old axiom" of being careful what you ask for," thing" and the fact that the US Army still uses the old and bold, time proven, 8 inch gun while the AF attempts to produce "Star Wars" fighters and does a sloppy job of that. Lets face it, sloppy seems in these days. And you think my first response was verbose and "babbling'? Hell fella, I'm just warming up! Would you like some more? I'm primed and ready!