- Thread starter
- #161
What part of Obama got nothing is giving you a hard time?
We'll see who "got nothing" before it's over.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What part of Obama got nothing is giving you a hard time?
But, they're sitting on a pile of cash right now and not spending it to diversify or increase production. Why not?
What part of Obama got nothing is giving you a hard time?
We'll see who "got nothing" before it's over.
Obama is such a good negotiator, "sit down shut up and do what I say", then he goes out on the campaign trail besmirching everyone that was in the room
He is great orator, but one useless prick at the negotiating table.
But, they're sitting on a pile of cash right now and not spending it to diversify or increase production. Why not? How will a tax cut make any difference?
But, they're sitting on a pile of cash right now and not spending it to diversify or increase production. Why not? How will a tax cut make any difference?
In a free country, you're allowed to save money. Maybe you see potential savings in solar energy, but recognize the efficiencies are growing quickly, so yo wait for a better product. Point is, YOU don't get to decide what those with money do with it, they do.
What angst are you talking about?Obama is such a good negotiator, "sit down shut up and do what I say", then he goes out on the campaign trail besmirching everyone that was in the room
He is great orator, but one useless prick at the negotiating table.
Is this simply about obamacare? Is that what all of the conservative angst towards him is about? I'm simply curious.
But, they're sitting on a pile of cash right now and not spending it to diversify or increase production. Why not? How will a tax cut make any difference?
In a free country, you're allowed to save money. Maybe you see potential savings in solar energy, but recognize the efficiencies are growing quickly, so yo wait for a better product. Point is, YOU don't get to decide what those with money do with it, they do.
That's fine. But, I don't see any point in giving them even more to sit on, do you? Why?
Part of market nibbleness and ushering in new technology is ready capital. These are both excellent reasons for creating new jobs.
Part of market nibbleness and ushering in new technology is ready capital. These are both excellent reasons for creating new jobs.
Large corporations are now sitting on more capital than they have ever had. At this point their lack of spending and hiring IS the problem. Unless you think the government should be hiring?
Wasn't the whole point of the tax cuts in the first place was to give these corporations more money to create jobs? Walmart could give all of their hourly rated employees a $5K per annum raise, still book a very healthy profit and save the American taxpayers $422K PER STORE in employment subsidies. Just remeber how many of your tax dollars Walmart employees are getting the next time you shop there for your cheap detergent. Is it worth it?
The Jesuits weigh in on the fiscal cliff:
Jesuit Conference Statement on Taxes and the Fiscal Cliff « The Society of Jesus in the United States
All you Republicans here will be pleased to know that Robert Reich, Labor Secretary under Bill Clinton, is in favour of going over the cliff too. He says that if it happens, the Republicans will lose the house in 2 years:
Robert Reich
It's the second post: He says, don't back down, don't give it. I couldn't agree more.
If I was the GOP I'd call Obama every name in the book, tell him to go fuck himself, and save their jobs in the process.
Boner is too much of a gutless GOP neocon establishment party man tool to go that route.The Jesuits weigh in on the fiscal cliff:
Jesuit Conference Statement on Taxes and the Fiscal Cliff « The Society of Jesus in the United States
All you Republicans here will be pleased to know that Robert Reich, Labor Secretary under Bill Clinton, is in favour of going over the cliff too. He says that if it happens, the Republicans will lose the house in 2 years:
Robert Reich
It's the second post: He says, don't back down, don't give it. I couldn't agree more.
It's looking more and more like going over the cliff is better than what Obama wants.
I say the House needs to pass an extension of the Bush Tax-cuts and let Obama do what he's going to do. He's never going to agree to anything.
If I was the GOP I'd call Obama every name in the book, tell him to go fuck himself, and save their jobs in the process.